PPRuNe Forums

Go Back   PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Flying Instructors & Examiners
Forgotten your Username/Password?


Flying Instructors & Examiners A place for instructors to communicate with one another because some of them get a bit tired of the attitude that instructing is the lowest form of aviation, as seems to prevail on some of the other forums!


Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 12th Oct 2011, 07:36   #1 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Germany
Age: 28
Posts: 27
Removal of No Night Instruction Restriction

Hi @all,

in the Lasors, they say:

- Hold either a NIght Qualification or Night Rating and be in current flying practice.

Does someone know what they mean with "current flying practice"?

Does they mean a valid night rating? (1 night landing in 90 days)?

Michael
pinguair is offline   Reply
Old 12th Oct 2011, 08:09   #2 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Europe
Posts: 3,882
The usual vague meaningless comment that abounds in LASORS. As the currency requirement for an FI course is 5 hours in the previous 6 months, one could not expect any more.

As there is no longer any night currency requirement, the 90 day rule is entirely related to the carriage of passengers, it is not a measure of "rating currency"
Whopity is offline   Reply
Old 15th Oct 2011, 20:45   #3 (permalink)
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: UK
Posts: 955
Since a student is part of the flight crew and not a passanger, the 1 night landing in 90 days would not apply.

If you have an instrument rating the rule does not apply anyway.
RTN11 is online now   Reply
 
 
This ad will disappear if you login
Reply
 


Thread Tools


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT. The time now is 00:20.


vBulletin® v3.8.7, Copyright ©2000-2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
SEO by vBSEO 3.6.1
© 1996-2012 The Professional Pilots Rumour Network

As these are anonymous forums the origins of the contributions may be opposite to what may be apparent. In fact the press may use it, or the unscrupulous, or sciolists*, to elicit certain reactions.

*"sciolist"... Noun, archaic. "a person who pretends to be knowledgeable and well informed".