PPRuNe Forums

Go Back   PPRuNe Forums > Non-Airline Forums > Flying Instructors & Examiners
Forgotten your Username/Password?
PPRuNe Email Register FAQ Calendar Advertise Mark Forums Read

Flying Instructors & Examiners A place for instructors to communicate with one another because some of them get a bit tired of the attitude that instructing is the lowest form of aviation, as seems to prevail on some of the other forums!


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 18th June 2008, 16:53   #1 (permalink)
MrAverage
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Uxbridge
Posts: 12
Pic Under Supervision

My boss maintains that he has a special agreement with the CAA whereby our licence holding members can always log P1u/s whenever on club checkouts. My understanding was, that around 15 years ago, the CAA stipulated that the only time P1u/s could be logged was on a successful flight test with an examiner - and that all flights with instructors should be logged as dual Pu/t; with the instructor logging P1. I've tackled him about this 2 or 3 times (diplomatically of course) but only last week he said it was re-confirmed again last year as OK, in response to my query at that time. Short of phoning the CAA and possibly dropping him in the proverbial I am at a loss for a way forward. Unless I can find another CFI position somewhere locally I cannot afford to lose my position. Obviously I am logging those flights as P1 instructional flights. Any ideas chaps?

MrAverage is offline  
Reply
Old 18th June 2008, 18:02   #2 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Kent
Posts: 43
Think you're right about P1/US. The club member could log a checkout flight as P1 if you're happy to let him do that. But it would mean he would be responsible and you would effectively be an observer. However, your club insurance might require you to be the P1 for these checkout flights.

Maybe you could ask your boss exactly who at the CAA the agreement has been made with. Sounds a bit dubious.
FlyingGasMain is offline   Reply
Old 18th June 2008, 18:16   #3 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: notts
Posts: 558
Whose who?

Well, for a start your boss does not have a private arrangement with the CAA and nor does anyone else.

For me, a club check is simply that. The arrangement has no lawful authority. The flight is simply a contractual matter between the owner and the hirer. The pilot being checked therefore should log the flight as P1 unless the instructor has had to interfere.

Therefore, for me, the question is more to do with what the instructor logs. LASORS states: Section A, Appendix B, Page 40, Recording of Pilot Function: para 1c. The holder of an instructor rating may log as pilot-in-command all flight time during which he acts as an instructor in an aeroplane/helicopter or ..... etc.

The question is: Are you acting as an instructor during a club check? If the pilots licence and experience is valid including the 90 day rule then anyone could do the check for the owner. If the 90 day rule or some other element could not be complied with then only an instructor could accompany. You would therefore be, somewhat obviously, acting as an instructor in the circumstances.

The CAA without doubt encourage any arrangement whereby an instructor always undertakes routine checks. There are precendents where both pilots log PIC. In certain circumstances during CPL/IR training - the student logs SPIC and the instructor PIC. The Captain of multi-crew aircraft when resting continues to log PIC although the co-pilot will also log PIC simultaneously, when they are handling pilot, during the captains rest.
homeguard is offline   Reply
Old 18th June 2008, 18:18   #4 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: England
Posts: 513
Unless you have a copy of it in writing from someone in authority at the CAA, the previous rules will have to be followed, i.e. pilot only logs PICUS following a successful flight test with an authorised examiner.
Apart from anything else, you need to teach students that the rules are as per the ANO unless the CAA say otherwise in writing.
QNH 1013 is offline   Reply
Old 18th June 2008, 21:17   #5 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Jan 1999
Location: Lurking within the psyche of Dave Sawdon
Posts: 464
I'm amazed that this topic KEEPS coming up. The rules are clear and easy to find - P1/s for single crew aircraft is only applicable to a successful flight test with an examiner.

Homeguard
Unusually, I don't agree with what you've said. On a check-out I have one simple test to determine who logs what: who would fill-out the accident report? This person signed for the aircraft, and is responsible for the safe conduct of the flight. They are therefore the Captain and log P1. In my experience, for a club check-out this is invariably the instructor.

If people don't like the rules then talk to the authorities to get them changed (please); but don't complain here, say what the rules should be, or ignore them. Once you ignore one rule it's easier to ignore the rest.

HFD
hugh flung_dung is offline   Reply
Old 19th June 2008, 08:06   #6 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 1,044
Quote:
My boss maintains that he has a special agreement with the CAA whereby our licence holding members can always log P1u/s whenever on club checkouts.
Thers is no such thing as a special arrangement other than a written exemption to the ANO! Your logbook is determined by the ANO Article 35 which requires that you log
Quote:
(c) the capacity in which the holder acted in flight;
How you determine that is up to the holder. The CAA only provide "guidance" on what they will accept for licence/rating issue or revalidation; it is simply, "guidance" aimed at preventing applications without sufficient hours, nothing more than that. The CAA have no interest in what you put in your log, only that you meet the minimum requirements for issue or revalidation (and don't exceed the maximums.) What you put in your "personal" logbook is ultimately up to the individual.

Last edited by Whopity : 19th June 2008 at 08:16.
Whopity is offline   Reply
Old 19th June 2008, 10:36   #7 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: UK
Posts: 202
Quote:
My boss maintains that he has a special agreement with the CAA
Ask to see a copy of it in writing.....otherwise its Lasors 2008 and the ANO.....
TurboJ is offline   Reply
Old 20th June 2008, 20:09   #8 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: England
Posts: 99
Why not ring the CAA and get an authoritative opinion instead of dithering about what your boss claims?

"Special" arrangement with the CAA - about as likely as waking up and finding a Unicorn nibbling your roses in the morning.

http://www.caa.co.uk/default.aspx?ca...90&pageid=6297
Ozymandias is offline   Reply
Old 20th June 2008, 21:46   #9 (permalink)
jamestkirk
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Aberdeen
Posts: 459
P1/s

Yes there is alot of that about.

For club checkouts, there is no reason why they cannot log it P1 as long as you (FI) do not touch the controls.

I made the P1S mistake when I started instructing (check-outs). AS someone above stated, Its just for auth. examiner stuff.

LASORS can be a bit confusing sometimes. Whenever I had a question about licence stuff and got a headache trying to readtheabove document, I called the CAA. Generally really helpful and if theyculdnot give you an answer staright away, I got an e-mail.

jamestkirk is offline  
Reply
Old 22nd June 2008, 23:24   #10 (permalink)

Northern Monkey
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Newcastle, England
Posts: 222


The PIC U/S thing seems fairly clear
NinjaBill is offline   Reply
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes


Posting Rules
vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Coping without supervision Stockpicker Jet Blast 30 27th August 2004 19:20
Can a lapsed PPL fly solo under the supervision of an FI? tacpot Flying Instructors & Examiners 5 11th April 2003 19:14
ICUS Supervision Col. Walter E. Kurtz D & G General Aviation & Questions 17 19th January 2003 06:14
Solo Supervision MJR Flying Instructors & Examiners 8 29th April 2001 02:14
FI(R) Supervision Vortex1 Flying Instructors & Examiners 3 22nd March 2000 01:34


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:21.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC7
© 1996-2008 The Professional Pilots Rumour Network

As these are anonymous forums the origins of the contributions may be opposite to what may be apparent. In fact the press may use it, or the unscrupulous, or sciolists*, to elicit certain reactions.

*"sciolist"... Noun, archaic. "a person who pretends to be knowledgeable and well informed".