Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Other Aircrew Forums > Flight Testing
Reload this Page >

C Series handling quality assessment by Flight International

Wikiposts
Search
Flight Testing A forum for test pilots, flight test engineers, observers, telemetry and instrumentation engineers and anybody else involved in the demanding and complex business of testing aeroplanes, helicopters and equipment.

C Series handling quality assessment by Flight International

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11th Nov 2016, 15:12
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: On the lake
Age: 82
Posts: 670
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
C Series handling quality assessment by Flight International

In the Flight International magazine just released today, is a superb report by Mike Gerzanics of his assessment of the Bombardier C Series handling qualities.

I commend it to anyone interested in a readable comparison of the fly-by-wire systems offered by the various manufacturers. Very interesting, very readable and instructive.

https://www.flightglobal.com/news/ar...gh-its-431271/
twochai is offline  
Old 21st Nov 2016, 05:08
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Planet Earth
Posts: 2,087
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 7 Posts
Seems like a fine aircraft.


Surprised, however they didn't go with 'active sidesticks' as Gulfstream did on their new
500 / 600 models.



The benefits in overall Pilot awareness with both sticks moving in unison, trim inputs required and built in stick shaker are significant.
stilton is offline  
Old 21st Nov 2016, 12:29
  #3 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: On the lake
Age: 82
Posts: 670
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I agree. However, this seems the best of the lot without active feedback.
twochai is offline  
Old 22nd Nov 2016, 02:28
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Nirvana South
Posts: 734
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Around the time of the BRJ-X (the CSeries' predecessor) BA carried out a series of tests using both a NASA active stick and one by Sterling IIRC. The cross-cockpit feedback was improved but not sufficiently to warrant the additional complexity and loss of reliability in airline service.
ICT_SLB is offline  
Old 22nd Nov 2016, 05:12
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Planet Earth
Posts: 2,087
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 7 Posts
I can understand that, but the state of the art in active sidesticks has advanced significantly since then with the BAE product on the Gulfstream.


Too late, perhaps for the C Series, it was in development for a long time.


Shame because Gulfstream have come up with a superb solution to the problem of
lack of awareness regarding the other Pilots inputs and gives the Pilots valuable
feedback into the aircraft's state simultaneously.
stilton is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.