PPRuNe Forums

Go Back   PPRuNe Forums > Other Aircrew Forums > Flight Testing
Forgotten your Username/Password?


Flight Testing A forum for test pilots, flight test engineers, observers, telemetry and instrumentation engineers and anybody else involved in the demanding and complex business of testing aeroplanes, helicopters and equipment.


Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 18th Jan 2011, 16:21   #1 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Europe
Posts: 97
Braking system efficiency - Loss of braking - wet runway

Quote:
Determine estimated aircraft tire effective braking coefficient µ eff by using the following equations:

µ eff = 0.2 µ max + 0.7 µ max2 (µ max less or equal to 0.7) (4a)
µ eff = 0.7 µ max for µ max (µ max greater than 0.7) (4b)

These relationships between aircraft tire maximum braking and effective braking friction coefficient are based on the assumption that the total aircraft braking-system (tires, brakes, hydraulics, gear and antiskid efficiency can be generated by a single curve 4(a) and (b)
The above is quoted from the report: NASA Technical Paper 2917 - Evaluation of Two Transport Aircraft and Several Ground Test Vehicle Friction Measurements Obtained for Various Runway Surface Types and Conditions - A Summary of Test Results From Joint FAA/NASA Runway Friction Program, February 1990

Aircraft used B727 and B737

How relevant are these equations for todays braking systems (more than 20 years later)?
What level of uncertainty do the assumption tires, brakes, hydraulics, gear and antiskid efficiency can be generated by a single curve represent?
tribo is offline   Reply
Old 18th Jan 2011, 19:49   #2 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: UK
Posts: 1,120
Current certification aspects are in CS 25.109 where there are vaguely similar equations.
Some of the flight test assumptions are in AMC 25.109 para 3.5. “The tyres and brakes should not be new, but need not be in the fully worn condition. They should be in a condition considered representative of typical in-service operations”.
Anti-skid efficiency is discussed in para 3, (92% max), and the runway surface in para 3.3, which should be smooth.

Porous runways are discussed in 109 (d) 2

There are references to ESDU 71026 for braking coefficient of friction:

IHS ESDU 71026

IHS ESDU 95015

Also, see www.spaceagecontrol.com/AC25-7A.pdf references to 25.109
safetypee is offline   Reply
 
 
This ad will disappear if you login
Reply
 


Thread Tools


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT. The time now is 08:02.


vBulletin® v3.8.7, Copyright ©2000-2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
SEO by vBSEO 3.6.1
© 1996-2012 The Professional Pilots Rumour Network

As these are anonymous forums the origins of the contributions may be opposite to what may be apparent. In fact the press may use it, or the unscrupulous, or sciolists*, to elicit certain reactions.

*"sciolist"... Noun, archaic. "a person who pretends to be knowledgeable and well informed".