Airline Crew Scheduling
Thread Starter
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 38
Likes: 0
From: stockholm
Hi,
I have recently been put in charge of installing a new crew rostering system in my airline. Can anyone would be kind enough to recommend some scheduling software? Bearing in mind that we operate a fleet of 15 aircrafts (another 8 on order) on a scheduled basis ?
Many thanks in advance,
I have recently been put in charge of installing a new crew rostering system in my airline. Can anyone would be kind enough to recommend some scheduling software? Bearing in mind that we operate a fleet of 15 aircrafts (another 8 on order) on a scheduled basis ?
Many thanks in advance,
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
From: US
Scheduling Software
You should check out AIMS software.
WWW.AIMS.AERO
They are a fully integrated system or can work with other software systems. I've used it at two airlines successfully. It seems to be user friendly and mostly user configurable. Give it a look.
Good Luck, not an easy task you have. Make sure the whole team is on the same page.
WWW.AIMS.AERO
They are a fully integrated system or can work with other software systems. I've used it at two airlines successfully. It seems to be user friendly and mostly user configurable. Give it a look.
Good Luck, not an easy task you have. Make sure the whole team is on the same page.

Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 1,197
Likes: 18
From: Various at the moment
cool_pilot
Yes, I have used Acrobatico at various companies and have also used AIMS which by far is more superior (but is also VERY expensive) in comparison. You would need a substantial fleet (50 plus a/c) to make it a more viable and cost effective option, in my opinion.
I PM'd you yesterday in reply.
Rgds
Yes, I have used Acrobatico at various companies and have also used AIMS which by far is more superior (but is also VERY expensive) in comparison. You would need a substantial fleet (50 plus a/c) to make it a more viable and cost effective option, in my opinion.
I PM'd you yesterday in reply.
Rgds
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
From: England
Oh yes, the joy of AIMS. What a marvellous piece of kit. Can compile a report on almost anything and is a great tool for the majority of any airline. In fact theres only 2 areas where it lets itself down slightly.
1. Ops
2. Crewing
Apart from that its great.
Joking aside AIMS is very robust (bordering on bullett proof) but the manner in which changes are made is lengthy. Your Crewing dept will need to double in size to do the same job and Ops is made more complex too. Visually its not that great to look at either - but you'll get used to it.
1. Ops
2. Crewing
Apart from that its great.

Joking aside AIMS is very robust (bordering on bullett proof) but the manner in which changes are made is lengthy. Your Crewing dept will need to double in size to do the same job and Ops is made more complex too. Visually its not that great to look at either - but you'll get used to it.
Thread Starter
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 38
Likes: 0
From: stockholm
Cheers folks,
Gusset- AIMS is a reliable system it has alot of potential, but; and as DC9 said it would be more viable for a larger airline (50+ A/C)
Mr.Angry- At the mean time we have 15 A/C online and we need 10 pilots per A/C to operate them efficiently. As for cabin crew we have around 140 attendants.
Rgds,
Cool
Gusset- AIMS is a reliable system it has alot of potential, but; and as DC9 said it would be more viable for a larger airline (50+ A/C)
Mr.Angry- At the mean time we have 15 A/C online and we need 10 pilots per A/C to operate them efficiently. As for cabin crew we have around 140 attendants.
Rgds,
Cool
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 718
Likes: 0
From: Wherever my current employers wish to send me !!
AIMS is an excellent system. We (bmibaby) have 20+ a/c and the remark about having to double yr crewing/ops to work it is bull...
When we split from bmi, we went from working with six in crewing/hotac and four in ops, to THREE staff doing everything.
The system is dream to use and, with the right training given, can only benefit an airline. Expensive, yes, but speculate to accumulate?
And, no, I DON'T work for em !
When we split from bmi, we went from working with six in crewing/hotac and four in ops, to THREE staff doing everything.
The system is dream to use and, with the right training given, can only benefit an airline. Expensive, yes, but speculate to accumulate?
And, no, I DON'T work for em !
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 51
Likes: 0
From: GA USA
SITA have a system called CrewWatch. I think if you go to SITA - Air Transport Communications and IT solutions and follow the products link to Flight Ops you will find some info
cheers
cheers
Last edited by FL460; 2nd July 2008 at 12:53. Reason: typo
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
From: London
Also have a look at ASL systems "new york" suite.
Used this for 5 years for ops, crewing, commercial planning.
Excellent, robust system from a small company and very reasonably priced with good software support.
contacts :-
+44 01332 853520
[email protected]
www.aviationsystems.co.uk
Used this for 5 years for ops, crewing, commercial planning.
Excellent, robust system from a small company and very reasonably priced with good software support.
contacts :-
+44 01332 853520
[email protected]
www.aviationsystems.co.uk
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 115
Likes: 0
From: UK
I have just finished a tasking with a company in Holland and plus a small carrier in Finland. They were had the SITA Crewing system which was extremely good. But again I understand that they had excellent training, and use SITA Flight Planning as well.
In the UK I would go for AIMS as the best system, but again as mentioned it's the users that count.
DB10
In the UK I would go for AIMS as the best system, but again as mentioned it's the users that count.

DB10






