PPRuNe Forums

Go Back   PPRuNe Forums > Ground & Other Ops Forums > Flight/Ground Ops, Crewing and Dispatch
Forgotten your Username/Password?
PPRuNe Email Register FAQ Calendar Advertise Mark Forums Read

Flight/Ground Ops, Crewing and Dispatch A forum for the people who are engaged in operational control/flight dispatch/crewing and their colleagues airside in ramp dispatch, load control and ground handling, to discuss issues directly related to keeping their aircrew and aircraft operational.


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 28th April 2008, 14:49   #1 (permalink)
transwede
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: the lonely desert
Posts: 711
NCL Ground Handling

With the summer fast approaching and Servisair recently gaining the contract for handling TCX, does anyone know if or think that there is a need for a 3rd handling agent at NCL? Do airports with similar passenger throughput have more than 2?

There was a rumour circulating a while back that a 3rd company (Menzies/Aviance?) was to be interested in establishing a base at NCL, but nothing seems to have occurred, though the rumour is still a frequent one! On the other hand could an airline like T3 or EZY go self handling as they do at other stations, particularly T3 at NCL considering their growth recently?

This is by no means a bashing at Servis or Swiss

transwede is offline  
Reply
Old 28th April 2008, 17:38   #2 (permalink)
groundhand
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: UK
Posts: 293
Transwede,

The rumour was probably around when the EZY contract was up for renegotiating last year. When Servisair renewed it, it cooled the rumour. It'll start again in a couple of years.

As for a third agent.

No, total volume not high enough.

No, not until the airport infrastructure is improved.
An additional agent would add an additional (approx.) 20 % GSE to the airport; there is insufficient space for 2 agents in the undercroft, 3 would make life very difficult for all.

No, type of traffic does not offer much in terms of high yield handling.

No, the lack of accommodation both landside and airside for a 3rd compnay to have management and operational offices. (+ ramp parking for GSE)

As far as I am aware EZY do not handle themselves anywhere, and that means anywhere at all, not even LTN. Correct me if I'm wrong.

Jet2.com have gone self handling at LBA and will not be repeating that excercise for a while, if ever.

T3 have done it elsewhere, if they are getting good handling at NCL at a sensible rate they may not want to take the risk. Don't forget if you are self handling and have to reduce your programme you still have the costs (either direct or redundancy) of the ground operations.

This is probably not the time to take that type of risk with fuel prices going up, the credit crunch hurting the potential passengers etc.

One area that might be hived off is the coaching and disabled handling. This could go to an independent operator as the airport consistently fail to deliver any sensible level of service.

GH

groundhand is offline  
Reply
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes


Posting Rules
vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
SAS ground handling OLD BMA MAN Flight/Ground Ops, Crewing and Dispatch 6 29th January 2008 08:00
Ground Handling who does what? i need a break Flight/Ground Ops, Crewing and Dispatch 10 16th December 2007 12:54
Ground handling in Oz ozziekiwi D & G General Aviation & Questions 0 28th January 2006 08:55
ground handling smithoag Engineers & Technicians 0 25th August 2005 17:09
Ground Handling darrenmorris Engineers & Technicians 3 27th October 2003 09:35


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:10.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC7
© 1996-2008 The Professional Pilots Rumour Network

As these are anonymous forums the origins of the contributions may be opposite to what may be apparent. In fact the press may use it, or the unscrupulous, or sciolists*, to elicit certain reactions.

*"sciolist"... Noun, archaic. "a person who pretends to be knowledgeable and well informed".