PPRuNe Forums

Go Back   PPRuNe Forums > Ground & Other Ops Forums > Flight/Ground Ops, Crewing and Dispatch
Forgotten your Username/Password?
PPRuNe Email Register FAQ Calendar Advertise Mark Forums Read

Flight/Ground Ops, Crewing and Dispatch A forum for the people who are engaged in operational control/flight dispatch/crewing and their colleagues airside in ramp dispatch, load control and ground handling, to discuss issues directly related to keeping their aircrew and aircraft operational.


Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 13th June 2001, 23:24   #1 (permalink)
no sig
 
Posts: n/a
Post ACARS

We're giving some thought to the use of ACARS VHF/VDL1/2. Would appreciate an insight into the operational benefits and to what extent you are using it, e.g. do you send flight plans, weather, loadsheets etc. Be handy for me to know if you're operating in Europe or the States.

Many thanks

[This message has been edited by no sig (edited 13 June 2001).]

 
Old 14th June 2001, 15:59   #2 (permalink)
Lewy Boy
 
Posts: n/a
Post

we currently use ACARS to send loadsheets on our A330 fleet at BMI. We also send our loadsheets to the dispatcher and traffic office just incase ACARS fails but in the future we may just miss the dispatch sector out and send them straight to the flight deck.
 
Old 14th June 2001, 21:32   #3 (permalink)
JB007
 
Posts: n/a
Post

All sounding very impressive at LTN these days no sig....sounds cool

------------------
Regards JB007!
JB007@pilot.pprune.com
Flight Ops,Crewing and Dispatch Moderator
 
Old 15th June 2001, 02:44   #4 (permalink)
SAIIP
 
Posts: n/a
Talking

no sig,

ACARS make our life easlier then ever, we use it on collecting aircraft performance data for Maintance, uplink loadsheet for Load control and passenger info for traffic. In operations we use it to collect data on position report, long range communications (much better than VHF), weather uplink, message relating to reclear operations, recvd ATIS and Clearance (at some airport) and sometime foot ball result
We find it safer and clearer then voice communications, as it does not disturb the deck-crew (e.g. in approach, after take-off).

Brgds,
Sai
 
Old 15th June 2001, 03:24   #5 (permalink)
no sig
 
Posts: n/a
Post

Many thanks folks, sounds all very useful.

Hi JB trust you're well, pop in when next over our way.

 
Old 15th June 2001, 03:44   #6 (permalink)
Right on Time
 
Posts: n/a
Angry

LEWY BOY....."" WE MAY JUST MISS THE DISPATCH SECTOR OUT ""...??????????

 
Old 15th June 2001, 15:04   #7 (permalink)
JB007
 
Posts: n/a
Talking

Thanks no sig..will do..

 
Closed Thread


Thread Tools
Display Modes


Posting Rules
vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 13:29.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC7
© 1996-2008 The Professional Pilots Rumour Network

As these are anonymous forums the origins of the contributions may be opposite to what may be apparent. In fact the press may use it, or the unscrupulous, or sciolists*, to elicit certain reactions.

*"sciolist"... Noun, archaic. "a person who pretends to be knowledgeable and well informed".