Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Ground & Other Ops Forums > Engineers & Technicians
Reload this Page >

Changing the prop on an EASA aircraft

Wikiposts
Search
Engineers & Technicians In this day and age of increased CRM and safety awareness, a forum for the guys and girls who keep our a/c serviceable.

Changing the prop on an EASA aircraft

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 13th Jan 2017, 14:06
  #1 (permalink)  
Moderator
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 1999
Location: MAN. UK.
Posts: 2,790
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Changing the prop on an EASA aircraft

Hi All,

Yes, it's me again!

I have been considering ways of increasing the cruise speed on my 77 Archer II. It has the stock 60" prop on it and indicates the book figure of around 105kts at 75% power. It only has the basic spats so doesn't go much faster. All Archers post 77 have 62" props and full wheel fairings and of course are well known to cruise around ten knots or more faster.

The opportunity to change to a reconditioned 62" prop has come up and I am wondering what the legalities are surrounding the change. In simple terms any change to the basic design and configuration needs an EASA STC to be issued. Trouble is only those post 2003 are listed on their web site so I have no way of knowing if this has been done before. The FAA STC list also shows no previous entries on the subject.

Mention has been made that the change may be accommodated on the Archer 'type certificate' but I can't find anything that relates to pitch, only what the maximum RPM may be. In any event making the change without including the full fairings would create a hybrid configuration that the POH would not provide performance graphs for so I don't see the FAA or EASA wearing that.

Has anyone done this on an EASA aircraft and if so how did you go about it?

Any help appreciated.

BB
BoeingBoy is offline  
Old 13th Jan 2017, 15:54
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: USA
Posts: 751
Received 24 Likes on 19 Posts
Not again....

Possible alternative.

Might be easier (cheaper?) than putting the 62" prop on.

Welcome to MT-Propeller

Their main headquarters is on your side of the pond and EASA friendly.

I helped several people install these props for similar reasons and haven't heard anything negative.

Worth an email or call. Might be able to help get around the full fairing issue to get your speed??

Good luck!
W1
wrench1 is offline  
Old 13th Jan 2017, 17:07
  #3 (permalink)  
Moderator
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 1999
Location: MAN. UK.
Posts: 2,790
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Thanks Wrench. (And thanks for your help on the corrosion problem last summer. It all got painted out)

The composite prop is certainly worth a thought. I will check the price although I suspect it will not be cheap.

The FAA type certificate simply states that I must have a 76" Sensenich 76EM8S5 rotating within a 100RPM limit in ISA conditions. It makes no mention of what the pitch should be. Is the inference that I can change to a 62" pitch so long as I remain within the RPM limits?
BoeingBoy is offline  
Old 14th Jan 2017, 01:29
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: USA
Posts: 751
Received 24 Likes on 19 Posts
BB:

Yes, but…

Since the TCDS doesn’t differentiate between the -0-60 and -0-62 versions you can use that “62” prop on your plane. But you could also adjust your “60” prop toward a “62”.

You might gain better cruise, but you’ll lose a bit of climb also. It is what it is.

The Archer IIs are all under the same TC model variant. Basically the "same" plane.

So while you could physically tweak your ’77 model toward a ’78 model, you’ll be hindered by RPM limits and performance charts for your serial number aircraft. Ironically, TCDS Note 11 and 24 allows a ’78 model owner to remove his spinner and some fairings effectively slowing the aircraft down to a ’77 model speed.

Maybe look for a STC’d Fairing Kit that has a supplement allowing the use of the ’78 Archer limitations??

Maybe post on the US Piper Owners forum for some input?
http://www.piperowner.org/forum/forums.html

Contact Piper itself. Maybe they have a Service Bulletin or Letter that provides a means to get the ’78 model performance out of a ’77 model???
http://www.piper.com/

Then again… you can always upgrade to an Aero L-39 for improved cruise performance….

W1

PS: I was told there is a possible Hartzell STC prop option for a PA-28. Cheaper than MT??
wrench1 is offline  
Old 14th Jan 2017, 09:08
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Hanging off the end of a thread
Posts: 32,892
Received 2,830 Likes on 1,208 Posts
If it has been done under an AAN pre EASA then it can be done without a MOD under grandfather rights, ( unless things have changed ) I have done a quick scan through the UK AAN's but cannot see it, it also allows any MOD done by any other Country in EASA as an AAN. I seem to recall some people wanting to fit a prop on some big twin in the Bristol area and the CAA rejecting it until the people found it had been done previously in Italy or the likes and then they had to allow it.

https://www.caa.co.uk/Commercial-ind...pproval-notes/
NutLoose is offline  
Old 14th Jan 2017, 09:16
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Hanging off the end of a thread
Posts: 32,892
Received 2,830 Likes on 1,208 Posts
https://www.caa.co.uk/Commercial-ind...al-categories/
NutLoose is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.