question relates to MEL 24
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: us
Age: 45
Posts: 26
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
question relates to MEL 24
Does anybody know why MEL A321 says NO-GO for contactor 1PC2 while MEL A330 says NO-GO for 1PC1?
I think these 321 and 330 electrical system are same in nature.
I think these 321 and 330 electrical system are same in nature.
Join Date: Oct 1998
Location: CGK to HKG
Posts: 249
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Electrical systems are similar in nature!!
Will review the wiring diagram but suspect that its to do with ETOPS for the DC Tie Contactor and what the DC BUS 1 is suppling
TW
Will review the wiring diagram but suspect that its to do with ETOPS for the DC Tie Contactor and what the DC BUS 1 is suppling
TW
Join Date: Oct 1998
Location: CGK to HKG
Posts: 249
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
ATA 24
A330 ELEC DC BUS 1 FAULT
A number of items are made inop with this DC BUS 1 failure, but most important are the following:
TR1. L and R FUEL STBY and ZONE CTLR 1 single channel which are NO GO iaw the respective MEL ATA's
The R FUEL PUMP 2 affects ETOPS
CAPT WIPER affects land capability
Crew awareness:
Aircraft is down graded to CAT 3 SINGLE
PACK 1 at fixed temp
A321 later....
.... but I am sure that it will be something similar and on the lines of containing a component or system which is also NO GO iaw MEL ATA
TW
A number of items are made inop with this DC BUS 1 failure, but most important are the following:
TR1. L and R FUEL STBY and ZONE CTLR 1 single channel which are NO GO iaw the respective MEL ATA's
The R FUEL PUMP 2 affects ETOPS
CAPT WIPER affects land capability
Crew awareness:
Aircraft is down graded to CAT 3 SINGLE
PACK 1 at fixed temp
A321 later....
.... but I am sure that it will be something similar and on the lines of containing a component or system which is also NO GO iaw MEL ATA
TW
