PPRuNe Forums

Go Back   PPRuNe Forums > Ground & Other Ops Forums > Engineers & Technicians
Forgotten your Username/Password?
PPRuNe Email Register FAQ Calendar Advertise Mark Forums Read

Engineers & Technicians In this day and age of increased CRM and safety awareness, a forum for the guys and girls who keep our a/c servicable.


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 13th August 2008, 14:35   #1 (permalink)
jamestkirk
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Aberdeen
Posts: 478
what are the differences between a turboprop and jetprop

Hello.

Do any of you know the actual differences between a turboprop and jetprop.

I have searched in vain on many websites but have not found a definative answer.

Thanks

jamestkirk is offline  
Reply
Old 13th August 2008, 17:16   #2 (permalink)
Banned... Persona Non Grata
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Europe
Posts: 214
2 ways of saying the same thing. Turboprop is the most common.

Unless someone knows better.
Capot is offline   Reply
Old 13th August 2008, 18:07   #3 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Gatwick
Age: 40
Posts: 305
On this site, there is always someone that knows better, it is that sort of rumour network!
Litebulbs is offline   Reply
Old 14th August 2008, 01:45   #4 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Spain
Posts: 8
There is no difference. They are both Gas Turbine Engines driving a gearbox, which in turn drives a propellor.
Harry Lime is offline   Reply
Old 14th August 2008, 01:48   #5 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Spain
Posts: 8
Turbo?

There is no difference. Both are Gas Turbine Engines driving a gearbox which in turn drives a propellor.
Harry Lime is offline   Reply
Old 14th August 2008, 13:32   #6 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Aberdeen
Posts: 478
thanks

thanks everyone. maybe thats why i acnnot find any differing definitions.
jamestkirk is offline   Reply
Old 23rd August 2008, 21:27   #7 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: yyz
Posts: 217
JetProp sounds so much more exciting to the marketing dept.
rigpiggy is offline   Reply
Old 24th August 2008, 01:04   #8 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Aberdeen
Posts: 478
rigpiggy

I can see you are a man of truth
jamestkirk is offline   Reply
Old 20th September 2008, 23:05   #9 (permalink)
Fullblast
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: -------
Posts: 162
Jamestkirk, probably someone calls JetProp what should be called PropFan. In this case there's a big difference.

http://www.aerospaceweb.org/question...n/propfan2.jpg

FB

Fullblast is offline  
Reply
Old 21st September 2008, 22:09   #10 (permalink)
Educated Hillbilly
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: From the Hills
Posts: 466
Propjet tended to be a term used by manufacturers in the US when the first turbo props were introduced. The term propjet was used long before the experimental propfan emerged.

Rigpiggy is probably correct in that it stems from the marketing departments.
The Electra was commonly referred to as a propjet and this aircraft was not succesful in the passenger market because it was an advanced (for its era) turboprop that was introduced as turbojets were becoming popular.
portsharbourflyer is offline   Reply
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes


Posting Rules
vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Differences between jets & turboprop for regional ops Rwy in Sight Questions 9 31st December 2007 12:23
Partner: Malibu Mirage or JetProp? skybeacon Private Flying 0 15th December 2007 10:47
Buy a turboprop - but which one? flyvantage Biz Jets, Ag Flying, GA etc. 25 1st July 2007 21:45
Piper Malibu JETPROP jbazaco Private Flying 0 21st November 2004 18:12
Turboprop V Jet Big_Mooney Passengers & SLF (Self Loading Freight) 2 9th October 2002 09:37


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 13:09.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC7
© 1996-2008 The Professional Pilots Rumour Network

As these are anonymous forums the origins of the contributions may be opposite to what may be apparent. In fact the press may use it, or the unscrupulous, or sciolists*, to elicit certain reactions.

*"sciolist"... Noun, archaic. "a person who pretends to be knowledgeable and well informed".