PPRuNe Forums

Go Back   PPRuNe Forums > Ground & Other Ops Forums > Engineers & Technicians
Forgotten your Username/Password?
PPRuNe Email Register FAQ Calendar Advertise Mark Forums Read

Engineers & Technicians In this day and age of increased CRM and safety awareness, a forum for the guys and girls who keep our a/c servicable.


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 8th August 2008, 09:55   #1 (permalink)
beijingbob1hitman1
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Kinshasa Democratic Republic of the Congo
Posts: 10
727-200Cargo Airline going to MSG-3

Does anybody out there know if an airline buys 727-200 aircraft and puts them under MSG-3 maintenance program with a bridging B check. How does the MSG-3 maintenance program work?
I really need some help with this one. I have looked all over the Internet and cannot find any solid answers. I know about MSI,SSI, etc., but can't find out much more.

beijingbob1hitman1 is offline  
Reply
Old 8th August 2008, 22:56   #2 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Anglia
Posts: 317
Try this Link:-

MSG-3, The Intelligent Maintenance - November 2000 Issue - (Aircraft Maintenance Technology)

Its about seven or eight pages long - but might explain how the philosphy works.
Rigga is offline   Reply
Old 9th August 2008, 00:08   #3 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Minneapolis Mn USA
Posts: 63
I'm always willing to learn, but I didn't think you could apply an MSG3 based maintenance program to an MSG 2 designed aircraft. My understanding was that an MSG 3 aircraft was analyzed for structural and reliability capability in relational to failure modes and their effect on continued safe operation.

An MSG 2 aircraft with components and structures built around hard times and condition monitoring etc rather than reliability driven maintenance and inspection models, could be inadequately inspected because many of the components and structures were not designed for the MSG 3 style of capability maintenance.

If there was some way to do it, I'd be amazed if you could accomplish it via a lower level check like B check. I'd have thought a C or even a D plus SSID and AD's etc would have been more the order of business.

I'm betting there's a maintenance program PPruner somewhere out there with the answer....
BigJoeRice is offline   Reply
Old 9th August 2008, 23:20   #4 (permalink)
mary_hinge
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Under a Log
Posts: 249
They can be bridged, but usualy at a "D" check input. Several VIP operated aircraft are on the Boeing LUMP Programme, using MSG3 This puts the "C" checks at 24 month. Aircraft are VP-B or VP-C registered. An example:
Boeing 727 aircraft: 1971 Boeing 727 for sale on the Aircraft Exchange

MAINTENANCE PROGRAM:
The aircraft has a full Boeing CPCP program defined in the Maintenance Schedule and is fully compliant. The aircraft has been operating under the standard Boeing Low Utilization program and has been transitioned to the new MSG-3 Boeing Low Utilization program under which the C checks are performed at 24 month intervals.


mary_hinge is offline  
Reply
Old 22nd August 2008, 07:24   #5 (permalink)
CIAS
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Calgary
Posts: 2
Theres way more to MSG-3 than bridging at a convenient interval (it ain't B check) and then going flying at lower maintenance costs and higher reliability, especially with any Classic MSG-2 aircraft. MSG-3 is a good option for a high utilization operator and was originally contemplated for such, not VIP ops. In addition to program approval and solid bridging, operators require reliabilty programs that do more than report on last months failures and ops departments that can write up defects on something other than the last sector of the day while turning final into the main base.

A successful B727 operator in British Columbia has accomplished this with good reliabilty numbers and reduced costs but it wasn't easy or cheap.

CIAS is offline  
Reply
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes


Posting Rules
vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Career airline job vs Contract airline job Undecided username Questions 2 18th July 2005 23:47
airline or non airline this is the problem lovis9 Interviews, jobs & sponsorship 0 12th January 2005 22:10
'Airline' and 'Airline Pilot' reverserunlocked Questions 2 9th April 2003 01:35
Airline, or Not to Airline; Bonus, or Not??? hntrohne Questions 0 22nd July 2001 14:28


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 13:14.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC7
© 1996-2008 The Professional Pilots Rumour Network

As these are anonymous forums the origins of the contributions may be opposite to what may be apparent. In fact the press may use it, or the unscrupulous, or sciolists*, to elicit certain reactions.

*"sciolist"... Noun, archaic. "a person who pretends to be knowledgeable and well informed".