PPRuNe Forums

Go Back   PPRuNe Forums > Ground & Other Ops Forums > Engineers & Technicians
Forgotten your Username/Password?
PPRuNe Email Register FAQ Calendar Advertise Mark Forums Read

Engineers & Technicians In this day and age of increased CRM and safety awareness, a forum for the guys and girls who keep our a/c servicable.


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 11th July 2008, 04:48   #1 (permalink)
pacplyer
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Asia
Posts: 183
B747-200 throttle cable rigging question/accdnt

On another thread we are questioning the possible throttle position of a post accident 747. While this is strictly a hypothetical discussion, we'd like insight into the throttle cable rigging down from the upper deck to the engine. Does it route from the flight deck under the upper deck floor and then exit vertically down main deck stringers to the spars? (which is my memory)

Question arose on the Rumors thread about thrust lever behavior on known in-flight 747-200 separations vs Bogota crash; impact with the ground shearing engines off.

On two in-flight separations that I have accounts of now from colleagues , on engines that "cleanly" detached from failure of the fuse pins: the affected throttle violently slammed to idle as the engine departed while airborne (producing thrust) pulling the control cable with it. (I suspect the engines either dropped straight down or rotated off the pylons in flight.)

Are there any bell-cranks or pulleys in the throttle control routing (or designed/likely failure points in the rigging) that might fail differently if engines ripped off to the rear from impact?
Or fail differently if the upper deck separated and was thrown clear of the burning wreckage? (which is the case here.)

Photos follow.
note also the lack of rotational damage to the core engine fan sections. Does this look strange to you? Wouldn't you expect symmetrical fan blade damage if more than windmilling rotation was present (i.e greater than idle thrust was being produced?)

Here are the photos; kalitta fo

Thanks

Last edited by pacplyer : 11th July 2008 at 05:05. Reason: windmilling added

pacplyer is offline  
Reply
Old 12th July 2008, 00:32   #2 (permalink)

Usual disclaimers apply!
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: windsor
Posts: 571
Snoop

From memory (we're all electric now) The cables run in pairs from the flight deck throttle pack under the floor outboard at an angle to pulleys somewhere above doors 1 L/R, then aft (through cutouts in the u/d floor beams) to roughly inline with the wing leading edge. There is then two change of direction (pulleys) outboard then down (next to the aircon risers) then, there is another change of direction to run along the wing leading edge to the pylons. They then change again to pass along the pylon and terminate in a mixing box that converts the rotary motion into a push-pull motion. From there on its 'teleflex' cable to the JFC.
Personally I think that the final positions of the T/L's resulted from the cables being snagged as the airframe folded on impact.
As for the engine. I would have expected to see more evidence of fan blade damage if it had been rotating (under power) on impact. The engine in the picture may have been shutdown prior in which case it would have just been windmilling.
gas path is offline   Reply
Old 12th July 2008, 03:52   #3 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Asia
Posts: 183
Very Good description Gas Path. Good memory too. A couple of questions if I may,

1. Where exactly is this mixing box? that converts to teleflex push/pull cable to rotational pulley? Any torque tubes involved?

2. How tight are these cable runs and how critical is their alignment? The reason I ask is we had a problem on some old 74's of T/L's being difficult to move.

So in the case of an in flight separation, all the pulleys and all the cable run stringer/floorbeam cutouts are in serviceable alignment and that's what causes the T/L to slam snap to idle if the engine fuse pins fail and the engine departs.

But in the case of violent distortion of the pylon, would you think teleflex transition (at the mixing box) from push pull to rotational pulley might be somewhat in question?

I wouldn't expect misalignment (initially) along the titanium spar, if that's where the cable run is... used to look up into the drooping slats and see a lot of stuff up there.... are the T/L cables not visible in the leading edge from the ground?; are they in a dry bay behind the spar or something?

Are there any torques tubes involved in any of this?

Not trying to play accident investigator, just a limited experience A&P trying to learn. I realize that the complexities of disintegration of the airframe are certainly not knowable by us, however, it appears to me that a wet earthen berm was hit about halfway through the impact site. Could this account for sudden N1 stoppage? (aircraft skidding along until ground level changes.) I see a great amount of earth and grass packed in one side of the fan section of one of the engines. If, (hypothetically speaking of course,) that were the case: sudden N1 arrest into an earthen berm, would you expect to find resulting damage to the core? Doesn't N1 spin freely of the N2 compressor and turbine exhaust shafts? Say for a JT9D-Q for example.

Thanks for any thoughts guys.

The ground level change appears in the bottom right photo of six (aft clicking, scroll up) :

747-200F down in Bogota ?

pac

Last edited by pacplyer : 12th July 2008 at 06:00. Reason: improved verb-age
pacplyer is offline   Reply
Old 12th July 2008, 15:33   #4 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: PM me to join the Etihad Facebook group!
Posts: 98
in the boeing if over 30 pounds of force needed to push throttles then
ZaaZoo is offline   Reply
Old 12th July 2008, 17:03   #5 (permalink)

Usual disclaimers apply!
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: windsor
Posts: 571
Snoop

The mixing box is located in the pylon. There are no torque tubes involved.
In most cases a stiff throttle could be the teleflex cable as the nylon inner used to break up. Having said that, occasionally the insulation blanket around the L/E pneumatic duct could get wrapped round the cables. (always good to do a full and free check after replacing the duct and/or blankets!!). The cables run along fwd. of the front spar behind the pneumatic duct!).
The mixing box just translates the cable rotary motion around the pulley into a straight push-pull of the teleflex.
Just a guess regarding the T/L and engine separation. If an engine departs the whole of the teleflex would get ripped out of the pylon and possibly, though not by design, that action would snap the T/L back, however in this case as the airframe itself collapsed who knows?. A different scenario all together.
Ooerr! my brain hurts
gas path is offline   Reply
Old 14th July 2008, 04:40   #6 (permalink)
pacplyer
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Asia
Posts: 183
Thanks Gas Path,

Fascinating machine still to this day. Sorry to wring you brain out over nothing!

pac "Inspector Clouseau" plyer

pacplyer is offline  
Reply
Old 21st July 2008, 14:10   #7 (permalink)
SUB
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Aust
Posts: 39
Cables

Have worked on the 747 for 20yrs, one answer to your question is that the cable run behind the pneumatic ducting just i/b of the engines has what is called cable stops which are installed on each cable (total 8). They are a circular metal fitting that the cable connects to and the assyembly passes through a cable stop bracket which has a micarta block attached to it. There is a specific dimention that is measured from the micarta to the stop which is used during cable rigging. If this measurement is out of limits the theory is that the cable has stretched and should be replaced.

Also in the throttle cable system to decrease friction and increase wear life, the
cables are routed through large diameter pulleys with form fitting
grooves.

Back to the cable stops, they play one more very important job which may help with your questions, if there is an engine seperation the cable stops contact the stop bracket micarta block and the cable shears to prevent the throttle control stand being ripped out of the cockpit and taking out the control and power settings of the other engines (smart hey) hopes this helps.

SUB is offline  
Reply
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes


Posting Rules
vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
B747-400 APU Door Question dontdoit Tech Log 6 23rd April 2007 06:45
Help Ned with his campaign rigging! SASless Rotorheads 2 6th July 2006 08:31
B747-100 Question Jet_A_Knight Tech Log 6 8th March 2004 07:25
Load rigging chart flipcelia Rotorheads 1 17th January 2004 17:33
A320 Throttle question(s) [Steve] Tech Log 6 2nd September 2000 03:42


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:27.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC7
© 1996-2008 The Professional Pilots Rumour Network

As these are anonymous forums the origins of the contributions may be opposite to what may be apparent. In fact the press may use it, or the unscrupulous, or sciolists*, to elicit certain reactions.

*"sciolist"... Noun, archaic. "a person who pretends to be knowledgeable and well informed".