PPRuNe Forums

Go Back   PPRuNe Forums > Ground & Other Ops Forums > Engineers & Technicians
Forgotten your Username/Password?
PPRuNe Email Register FAQ Calendar Advertise Mark Forums Read

Engineers & Technicians In this day and age of increased CRM and safety awareness, a forum for the guys and girls who keep our a/c servicable.


Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 8th October 2005, 14:44   #1 (permalink)
King Pong
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: UK
Posts: 285
Monarch Aircraft Engineering £500,000 prang

Small photo at http://www.manchesteronline.co.uk/m...jet_prang_.html

IT is the parking prang that will cost more than £½ million.

Ground staff reversing a passenger jet at Manchester Airport accidentally struck an aircraft hangar causing a long delay for more than 300 passengers - and a six-figure bill for holiday firm Thomas Cook.

The rudder on the Airbus 330 was twisted in the prang during a routine maintenance check by engineers.



Thomas Cook was immediately forced to cancel its scheduled flight to Cuba and scour airports around the world for a replacement aircraft big enough to take the 333 disappointed passengers.

After a frantic search, the only available stand-in plane was found - a Boeing 747 in Madrid.

It cost Thomas Cook £200,000 to charter the plane from a firm called Air Pullmantur and then to fly it from Spain to Manchester.

Meanwhile, the firm also had to pay an estimated £150,000 to fly a new rudder to Manchester in a Hercules cargo plane from the Airbus factory in Toulouse, France.

Repairing the damage is expected to cost an additional £200,000. And then there was the expense of arranging hotels for the 333 stranded passengers and supplying them with meal vouchers - another bill of around £25,000.

As the holidaymakers left Manchester Airport for Cayo Coco 30 hours late, Thomas Cook bosses were said to be "furious" at the sky-high cost of the minor crash.

It is understood it occurred while the aircraft was being moved on the ground by staff working for Monarch Aircraft Engineering.

Grandfather Kaz Janski, a holidaymaker from Huddersfield, was with a family of five who paid £4,000 for their trip.

Shortly before he finally boarded the replacement plane for the 10-hour flight, he said: "We were already in the departure lounge when we were eventually told we would be spending the night in Manchester."

A Thomas Cook spokesman said: "We did everything we could to help our passengers following the delay caused by this situation."

A spokesman for Monarch Aircraft Engineering said: "We can confirm that damage was caused to an aircraft while it was being manoeuvred. An investigation has been launched."

King Pong is offline  
Old 9th October 2005, 12:31   #2 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: England
Posts: 277
Your link is broken and I think someone got a bit carried away with the zeros on those guestimates.
£150000 to fly the rudder in -
Fargoo is online now  
Old 9th October 2005, 15:00   #3 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: LGW
Age: 39
Posts: 177
big deal, rudder got damaged so what? sh1t happens
smudgethecat is offline  
Old 11th October 2005, 21:06   #4 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: flyover country USA
Age: 66
Posts: 2,504
Try this link

I think I'd look awfully closely at the fin for secondary damage.
barit1 is offline  
Old 12th October 2005, 18:14   #5 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: England
Posts: 277
I'd take back your comment, the photo was taken after a lot of work was already done preparing to remove the rudder.
The fin isn't damaged - just bits removed.
Fargoo is online now  
Old 15th October 2005, 09:52   #6 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Manchester
Age: 38
Posts: 276
Just as a matter of interest, how are the banksmans career prospects doing???
cessna l plate is offline  
Old 20th October 2005, 22:17   #7 (permalink)
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 54
shite happens, i was at BA when 2 similar things happened to 744's. one not our own! Both of which took months to repair!

I hope the usual corporate witch hunt doesnt ensue.

Human Factors anyone???


F/Satis
FunctionedSatis is offline  
Old 21st October 2005, 09:16   #8 (permalink)

Pilots' Pal
 
Join Date: Nov 1998
Location: Resident of Cumbria but usually in the air or on the road.
Age: 47
Posts: 864
If MAEL MAN hasn't changed since I left, commercial pressure and table-banging are the norm.
Bus429 is offline  
Old 13th November 2005, 02:39   #9 (permalink)
facts please
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: USA
Posts: 4
"Sh1t happens" - What a professional attitude.

With attitudes of like this, what hope for the standing & status of LAEs?

Time & pressure no excuse for not having wing & tail men when putting an aircraft in or out of a hangar.

facts please is offline  
Old 13th November 2005, 14:31   #10 (permalink)
smudgethecat
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: LGW
Age: 39
Posts: 177
get your facts right facts please before posting crap like that when you havent a clue what went on, wingmen were present and the accident still happened no doubt not helped by the fact the driver has a very tight slot in the roof to get the fin through and a very limited area to manovuere his tug ,sh1t happens get over it

smudgethecat is offline  
Closed Thread


Thread Tools
Display Modes


Posting Rules
vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:46.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC7
© 1996-2008 The Professional Pilots Rumour Network

As these are anonymous forums the origins of the contributions may be opposite to what may be apparent. In fact the press may use it, or the unscrupulous, or sciolists*, to elicit certain reactions.

*"sciolist"... Noun, archaic. "a person who pretends to be knowledgeable and well informed".