PPRuNe Forums

Go Back   PPRuNe Forums > Dunnunda, Godzone and the Pacific > DG&P Reporting Points
Forgotten your Username/Password?
Register FAQ Calendar Advertise Mark Forums Read

DG&P Reporting Points Airline and RPT issues in Australia, enZed and the Pacific


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 4th November 2009, 23:08   #41 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Oz
Posts: 218
My statements are based upon years of dealing with CASA at the very highest level. I have fought and beat them through bloody minded determination after they put every obstacle possible in my way, I have “lame duck” letters of apology and proof of “counselling” from the then Director, to individuals and organisations, I have the results of a 12 month Commonwealth Ombudsman’s investigation in hand, I have letters signed by The Deputy Prime Minister of the day, I have Hansard records debating my case in The Senate, I have offers and acceptances of Act of Grace payments, (not from CASA though). However to this day, the perpetrators of my misfortune are still in business because they were mates of the boss, and still a possible menace to you. The main CASA players may have moved on, but their replacements have done nothing by way of change to show me they have learnt anything from the experience except how to better cover their arse.

And you dare to suggest I may not know what is going on. By insulting my efforts to make things better for general aviation in this country, you insult everyone who has “had a go”. WTF have you done?

There are many who have lost their income, their future, their families, their pride and credibility but “ALL OF US” have lost “MONEY”, lot’s of it, because of CASA indifference, arrogance, a willingness to defend the indefensible, and corrupt the system you clown.

People who take all the benefits obtained by individuals who put a lot of hard work into at least attempting to fix the system, but stand idly by and rain insults down on those achievers are piss poor examples of Human Beings, and your “weasel words”, epitomise this.

John McCormick so far has shown he is a carbon copy of the last few Directors. Perhaps a bit more sensitive to criticism.

I sincerely hope I am wrong in my assessment.

[/font][/color]
Frank Arouet is offline   Reply
Old 6th November 2009, 11:57   #42 (permalink)



Victim of a bored god

Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 1996
Location: Australia
Posts: 2,165
Any further personal "sprays" and the thread will be gone!

__________________
Tail Wheel
Dunnunda Forum Moderator
tail wheel is offline   Reply
Old 12th November 2009, 00:40   #43 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Australia
Posts: 82
BBC NEWS | Business | Cathay in $7.6m payout to pilots

The current head of CASA was part of the 'Star Chamber' which selected these pilots for dismissal. Justice has finally been served.
Captain Dart is offline   Reply
Old 12th November 2009, 00:50   #44 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: InDahAir
Posts: 228
The poor guy that passed away...does his estate inherit the judgement?
Kangaroo Court is offline   Reply
Old 12th November 2009, 02:10   #45 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: North
Posts: 253
The feedback coming from the meetings between CASA and ASA show that the April 2010 deadline is a pipe dream.

ASA do not have the resources. CASA don't or won't understand this.

From most observations of these meetings, most doubt that CASA have the resources or understanding of the Airspace implications either, or change & education process that is required.

This process seems to be driven by the appearance of being decisive - at the expense of common sense and correct process.

One interesting observation, is that CASA intend for Class D procedures at the ex-GAAP's to be different to procedures at existing Class D aerodromes.

WTF?

This is not a criticism of the man in charge - wouldn't know him, couldn't care. But CASA do not need another big failure. And if they do - heads will turn towards the man driving this.

I hope I am wrong and common sense and correct consultation occurs - not consensus consultation, but the neccessary consultation with those who know the airspace and the issues on a daily basis.
coral is offline   Reply
Old 12th November 2009, 05:38   #46 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Oz
Posts: 218
McCormick is quoted as saying he intended to regulate with a capital "R".

Nothing has changed. A continuing lack of consultation and over prescriptive regulation to suit some political need.

He should be mending fences rather than atagonising industry with demonstrative chest beating.
Frank Arouet is offline   Reply
Old 12th November 2009, 09:07   #47 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Australia
Posts: 64
Time to go?

The current head of CASA was part of the 'Star Chamber' which selected these pilots for dismissal.

If this is true then he should really resign from CASA. No pilot in Australia will take the slightest notice of what he has to say after the Cathay verdict.

Last edited by Timber : 12th November 2009 at 10:04.
Timber is offline   Reply
Old 12th November 2009, 15:25   #48 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: InDahAir
Posts: 228
Is the Hong Kong Court Summary available for print and posting, or do they have limited access? I can't find it.
Kangaroo Court is offline   Reply
Old 12th November 2009, 22:22   #49 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Australia
Posts: 82
It's here: http://www.cathaypilotsunion.org/pro...CXJudgment.pdf

There is also lots of other background on the whole affair on The Cathay Pilots Union Home Page .

McCormick was Chief Pilot (Boeing) at the time; he was a member of the 'Star Chamber' and readily recommended some of 'his boys' for termination.

Last edited by Captain Dart : 12th November 2009 at 23:18.
Captain Dart is offline   Reply
Old 13th November 2009, 13:19   #50 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Holland
Age: 46
Posts: 51
Colonic

Oh dear, the Skull seem's to be the agressive type. Perhaps it is that sort of person that CASA needs, to flush out all the trash ? Perhaps he will target 49 Inspectors ?
my oleo is extended is offline   Reply
Old 17th November 2009, 00:39   #51 (permalink)
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,676
Coral

You state

Quote:
One interesting observation, is that CASA intend for Class D procedures at the ex-GAAP's to be different to procedures at existing Class D aerodromes
That's because the procedures at our existing Class D aerodromes will also change to US Class D.

Coral, let’s hope you are 100% correct. That’s the whole idea of the CASA Direction. All of our non-radar towers will have the same procedures – all simplified, all following common sense, and all following the proven US NAS system.

When this goes ahead it will be a great improvement for everyone. I know of even reasonably high time GA pilots who will not fly into a place like Tamworth or Coffs Harbour because of the complexity of clearance requests, clearance limits and departure calls, etc.

Last edited by Dick Smith : 17th November 2009 at 00:50.
Dick Smith is offline   Reply
Old 18th November 2009, 08:03   #52 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Everywhere
Posts: 49
Is it just me or would anyone else find it difficult to either keep a straight face or believe anything from the head of CASA given what is now in the public arena regarding his role in the CX Starchamber.

Listening to a number of my colleagues thoughts on the Screaming Skull would suggest that any creditibility and trust has gone out the window.
Checklist Charlie is offline   Reply
Old 18th November 2009, 08:42   #53 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Australia
Posts: 64
Disgusting....

The method used by Cathay to instill fear in the pilot ranks by sacking a number (49) of randomly selected individuals is nothing less than social terrorism. For the government to hire someone as CASA CEO who apparantly has been actively involved in this treacherous backhanded action is a scandal of some magnitude.
Timber is offline   Reply
Old 18th November 2009, 09:01   #54 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Mostly at Work
Posts: 222
Dick Smith, you said:

Quote:
That's because the procedures at our existing Class D aerodromes will also change to US Class D.
If that were correct Dick it might be consistent, and workable.

But as I said, what we are hearing is:

Quote:
One interesting observation, is that CASA intend for Class D procedures at the ex-GAAP's to be different to procedures at existing Class D aerodromes.
i.e. diff procedures at the same time. How does a pilot know which is which?
direct.no.speed is offline   Reply
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes


Posting Rules
vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:27.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC7
© 1996-2009 The Professional Pilots Rumour Network

As these are anonymous forums the origins of the contributions may be opposite to what may be apparent. In fact the press may use it, or the unscrupulous, or sciolists*, to elicit certain reactions.

*"sciolist"... Noun, archaic. "a person who pretends to be knowledgeable and well informed".