PPRuNe Forums

Go Back   PPRuNe Forums > Dunnunda & Godzone > D & G Reporting Points
Forgotten your Username/Password?
PPRuNe Email Register FAQ Calendar Advertise Mark Forums Read

D & G Reporting Points Airline and RPT issues in Australia and enZed.


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 1st November 2007, 13:41   #1 (permalink)
HotPete
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Sydney
Posts: 41
Emirates Bangkok to Sydney turned back to Bangkok this morning

Anybody know what happened?
No passenger drama - no terrifying mid-air plunge.

HotPete is offline  
Reply
Old 2nd November 2007, 17:31   #2 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: KTA
Posts: 719
i am surprised emirates do bangkok-sydney????
topend3 is offline   Reply
Old 2nd November 2007, 19:56   #3 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 210
Daily for the last I'm not sure how many years, after they switched from SIN-SYD, also daily, for quite a few years before that.
Andu is offline   Reply
Old 3rd November 2007, 09:27   #4 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Dubai
Posts: 53
As the aircraft passed approximately FL180 the flight crew noted low engine oil pressure followed by the illumination of the EICAS warning for same. Almost immediately, this was followed by the oil low quantity EICAS. The crew actioned all the abnormal checklists which required the engine to be shut down.

BOEING 777-300 ROLLS-ROYCE ENGINES
Bypass ratio is offline   Reply
Old 3rd November 2007, 12:07   #5 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: Sydney, N.S.W. Australia
Posts: 92
Bangkok-Sydney is normally a GE90 -300ER. Are you sure it was RR powered Bypass?
Bankstown is offline   Reply
Old 3rd November 2007, 19:08   #6 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Dubai
Posts: 53
My apologies, yes it was a Boeing 777-300ER powered by the 115000LB GE90.

btw. I flew the 200LR the other day.......talk about lots of residual thrust!!
Bypass ratio is offline   Reply
Old 5th November 2007, 07:37   #7 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Crew Hotels
Posts: 227
Re the -200ER: check out the single engine ceiling, even at quite high weights. Seriously hypoxia-inducing.
MTOW is offline   Reply
Old 5th November 2007, 11:43   #8 (permalink)
Capt Fathom
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: FNQ
Posts: 1,178
Quote:
Re the -200ER: check out the single engine ceiling, even at quite high weights. Seriously hypoxia-inducing.
As the majority of us don't have a copy of said manual, Please explain....?

Capt Fathom is online now  
Reply
Old 7th November 2007, 00:15   #9 (permalink)
MTOW
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Crew Hotels
Posts: 227
Humble apologies, cap'n, but I was (and am) away from home when I posted that comment and didn't and don't have the manuals to hand so couldn't check the figures for my recollections, and I knew someone would correct me if I got it 500 feet wrong, so I was hoping someone might come up with them.

I can't remember the AUW, but it wasn't particularly light, and the SE ceiling was around (just above) 30,000 feet. Impressive, and the first time I've seen that figure as a single engine ceiling in a twin of any description.

MTOW is offline  
Reply
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes


Posting Rules
vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Bangkok so-what Fragrant Harbour 1 6th February 2007 03:55
Bangkok-Sydney Flight Progress Charts? noblues Tech Log 5 1st December 2006 14:55
Bangkok opsguy10 Jet Blast 4 27th September 2006 13:59
Bangkok mutt Night Stop 21 4th March 2006 23:23
Bangkok KiloMIke Night Stop 6 29th October 2005 08:36


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:15.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC7
© 1996-2008 The Professional Pilots Rumour Network

As these are anonymous forums the origins of the contributions may be opposite to what may be apparent. In fact the press may use it, or the unscrupulous, or sciolists*, to elicit certain reactions.

*"sciolist"... Noun, archaic. "a person who pretends to be knowledgeable and well informed".