PPRuNe Forums

Go Back   PPRuNe Forums > Dunnunda & Godzone > D & G General Aviation & Questions
Forgotten your Username/Password?
PPRuNe Email Register FAQ Calendar Advertise Mark Forums Read

D & G General Aviation & Questions The place for students, instructors and charter guys.


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 17th September 2007, 13:37   #1 (permalink)
blacksmith
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: brisbane
Posts: 3
PEC requirement gone?

Hi Guys

I'm coming back to dust off my CIR after a long break... there used to be a requirement to add a nominal 50' for PEC on precision approaches if the actual PEC was not known. Can't seem to find any reference to this in the current AIP... has the requirement changed?

blacksmith is offline  
Reply
Old 17th September 2007, 13:51   #2 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Adelaide
Age: 22
Posts: 309
Still applies and its there- just buried in with a lot of other text.

If you have Jepps its under Aerodrome Operating Minima TERMINAL AU-17 2.6.2
Chadzat is offline   Reply
Old 17th September 2007, 13:54   #3 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Qld troppo
Posts: 1,825
Yep. its still there but stuffed if I know where.

All I need to know is that it is Zero (that's 0) ft for the FTDK.

Dr

Last edited by ForkTailedDrKiller : 17th September 2007 at 23:03.
ForkTailedDrKiller is online now   Reply
Old 17th September 2007, 14:04   #4 (permalink)
TINTIN25
 
Posts: n/a
Yes CASA still like asking questions about PEC in their IREX exam!
  Reply
Old 17th September 2007, 16:06   #5 (permalink)
Unhinged
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Freezing my bum off, waay too far south of the tropics
Posts: 197
Yep, PEC is still there. AIP ENR 1.5, page 12, section 1.18.2

Depending on how long you've been out of IFR, another change which comes up especially on flight tests is how to deal with a discrepancy at the ILS check height. Have a look at the first paragraph in ENR 1.5, page 32, section 7.3.1 for the "new" (it's been around a while now ...) way of doing things.

Unhinged is offline  
Reply
Old 17th September 2007, 23:03   #6 (permalink)
blacksmith
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: brisbane
Posts: 3
OK thanks guys for all your input... +50' it is...

Now in terms of ENR1.5 - 7.3.1 - there usued to be a tolerance and now just explained or "unexplained discrepeancies". Mmmm - Well that makes it clearer???!!!

blacksmith is offline  
Reply
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes


Posting Rules
vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
SEP requirement MJR Flying Instructors & Examiners 7 24th May 2006 19:45
Which requirement? Martin1234 Medical & Health 8 27th October 2003 06:00
FAA PPL New Requirement bluskis Private Flying 0 28th March 2003 21:30
R-NAV requirement PorcoRosso Tech Log 3 5th April 2002 23:13
O2 Requirement Not_Another_Pot Dunnunda & Godzone 2 13th December 2001 10:32


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:30.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC7
© 1996-2008 The Professional Pilots Rumour Network

As these are anonymous forums the origins of the contributions may be opposite to what may be apparent. In fact the press may use it, or the unscrupulous, or sciolists*, to elicit certain reactions.

*"sciolist"... Noun, archaic. "a person who pretends to be knowledgeable and well informed".