Topper..the FP exam is based on speed v accuracy..or it was when I passed it nearly 40 years ago. I was told by the examiner of the day (who must have been the most unpopular person on the planet around the RVAC )that the problem with most candidates was that he could not follow the reasoning behind the answers and if they had made a basic error he could not award marks for method.
I resolved to make sure that I stated what I was caculating and showed my caculations on the side. This paid off as I made a mistake in one section using TAS instead of GS. Having realised my mistake later on ( the wrong info had corrupted all my future answers)and not having the time to correct, I simply wrote a note on the paper stating the error, what I should have done and that
I had left the caculations as was. I subsequently made other errors in another question but still managed to get 93% indicating I lost few if any marks in this area.
The one thing you do not have in the exam is time and one should always cross check caculations with rough mental arithmatic.This was drummed into us by Bill Kennedy at RMIT who was a career navigator and in charge of Navigation with Ansett until his retirement...best of luck and I hope you enjoy your career as much as I did mine.
