Alternatives to Google
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Confoederatio Helvetica
Age: 68
Posts: 2,847
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Alternatives to Google
This isn't about if Google is good, bad or indifferent to you, your computer or your PSA level.. JB is the perfect place to discuss the evils, or otherwise of Google.
Having said that I'm looking for an alternative search engine that I can use on my Mac, my iPad and iPhone. Obviously using Safari. (There are other threads for Apple haters).
I've been using DuckDuckGo because it promises not to track you, which is good but it still uses the google engine, and I don't think that is unbiased.
So, any recommendations on an unbiased search engine?
Having said that I'm looking for an alternative search engine that I can use on my Mac, my iPad and iPhone. Obviously using Safari. (There are other threads for Apple haters).
I've been using DuckDuckGo because it promises not to track you, which is good but it still uses the google engine, and I don't think that is unbiased.
So, any recommendations on an unbiased search engine?
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Geneva
Posts: 188
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
)
Guest
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Somewhere between E17487 and F75775
Age: 80
Posts: 725
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Earth
Posts: 3,663
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
So, any recommendations on an unbiased search engine?
Download a copy of Apache Nutch.
Buy a few hundred petabytes of storage space.
Point Nutch at "the internet", throw a stick and say "go fetch"
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Confoederatio Helvetica
Age: 68
Posts: 2,847
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
That's one reason why I wish to find an alternative, so I can actually see for myself.
OFSO, Start Page also uses the Google Search engine. They and DuckDuckGo keep Google from tracking you and that is good, but how do I know I'm getting the best answers to my questions?
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Earth
Posts: 3,663
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
ExXB,
The problem, as you know, is that the Google algorithms are very, very good. Even Bing, with the deep pockets of Microsoft behind it has not been able to make inroads.
Whilst, as I pointed out with Nutch, any man and his dog can index the internet, the problem many of Google's competitors face is achieving the same quality of relevance and noise-filtering. Most competitor search engines are still naïve implementations not too dissimilar to what you would have found back in the 90's.
It may just be that you're not using Google correctly ?
What exactly are you searching for that "often favour google's own product and services" ?
Don't get me wrong, I'm as keen as anybody to see a competitor to Google Search emerge..... monopolies are never a good thing in business .... but thus far, I've tested a few and none have come close.
The problem, as you know, is that the Google algorithms are very, very good. Even Bing, with the deep pockets of Microsoft behind it has not been able to make inroads.
Whilst, as I pointed out with Nutch, any man and his dog can index the internet, the problem many of Google's competitors face is achieving the same quality of relevance and noise-filtering. Most competitor search engines are still naïve implementations not too dissimilar to what you would have found back in the 90's.
It may just be that you're not using Google correctly ?
What exactly are you searching for that "often favour google's own product and services" ?
Don't get me wrong, I'm as keen as anybody to see a competitor to Google Search emerge..... monopolies are never a good thing in business .... but thus far, I've tested a few and none have come close.
I wasn't fishing for a debate as such, just asking to maybe narrow down your problem a bit.
A point to consider is that the results are in part based on how popular a site is, and YouTube is popular so will naturally feature in the top results. Chicken and egg? Maybe, but Youtube was popular before Google bought it. I just look further down the results if I want something different.
I'm with Mixture, Google is very good at search.
A point to consider is that the results are in part based on how popular a site is, and YouTube is popular so will naturally feature in the top results. Chicken and egg? Maybe, but Youtube was popular before Google bought it. I just look further down the results if I want something different.
I'm with Mixture, Google is very good at search.
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Earth
Posts: 3,663
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Of course nothing stopping you doing
or
either if a particular search is yielding a high youtube ratio.....
Or just use the old-school UI at ......
http://google.com/custom
A poor workman blames his tools
Code:
-site:youtube.com
Code:
-video
Or just use the old-school UI at ......
http://google.com/custom
A poor workman blames his tools
Last edited by mixture; 10th Oct 2014 at 15:45.
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Timbuktu
Posts: 962
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
As El Mix correctly notes, Google is an extremely good search engine.
I use it quite often but through DuckDuckGo which is incredibly awesome due to use of "!bangs" which lets you search different things directly, e.g.
!g = google
!gi = google images
!yt = youtube
!w = wikipedia
!imdb = imdb
e.g. !g cake = google search for "cake"
But it's quite clever and passes through these requests anonymously and with SSL etc. enabled, so it's MUCH better than using Google directly!!
DDG itself is not particularly great but often gets the job done for basic searches. And it's easy enough to tap the home key followed by !g to try Google instead.
There are thousands of these "!bangs", with and without abbreviations (e.g. "!google" works) and you can often just guess and find that it works.
Furthermore, you can even add !bangs yourself, subject to verification by DDG. I have added Airliners.net and Airframes.org
I use it quite often but through DuckDuckGo which is incredibly awesome due to use of "!bangs" which lets you search different things directly, e.g.
!g = google
!gi = google images
!yt = youtube
!w = wikipedia
!imdb = imdb
e.g. !g cake = google search for "cake"
But it's quite clever and passes through these requests anonymously and with SSL etc. enabled, so it's MUCH better than using Google directly!!
DDG itself is not particularly great but often gets the job done for basic searches. And it's easy enough to tap the home key followed by !g to try Google instead.
There are thousands of these "!bangs", with and without abbreviations (e.g. "!google" works) and you can often just guess and find that it works.
Furthermore, you can even add !bangs yourself, subject to verification by DDG. I have added Airliners.net and Airframes.org
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Sydney
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Alternative SE that's concern with your privacy
IxQuick - encrypts your search query
Wolframalpha - give you direct answers
Blekko - sends you links that will answer your questions instead of advertisement
Yippy - hate adult contents.
Boogle - loves adult content (owner:ex-developer of Google)
Wolframalpha - give you direct answers
Blekko - sends you links that will answer your questions instead of advertisement
Yippy - hate adult contents.
Boogle - loves adult content (owner:ex-developer of Google)
Nemo Me Impune Lacessit
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Derbyshire, England.
Posts: 4,091
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Maybe the 'favouritism' isn't all Google's fault? My niece runs a business and pays a fee to Google so that when someone starts searching for that type of business her company is one of the first up.
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Worldwide
Posts: 579
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
All search engines are biased and they all put you inside a bubble of filtered information. Don't stick to just one search engine, but use several, and the bubble will become a bit bigger and less biased.
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Confoederatio Helvetica
Age: 68
Posts: 2,847
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
It would seem that there are only three broadly based search engines: Google, Bing and Yahoo.
And the later two are not as good (?) as Google.
It would appear that there are no alternatives then.
Thank you all for your responses, I have my answer.
And the later two are not as good (?) as Google.
It would appear that there are no alternatives then.
Thank you all for your responses, I have my answer.
Guest
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Somewhere between E17487 and F75775
Age: 80
Posts: 725
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
how do I know I'm getting the best answers to my questions?
Firstly, that depends on defining "best". I am quite happy with Start Page (i.e. Google without the record/detail retention) for simple matters. But when looking up more complex matters - such as today, I was checking the spacing of shell-layered parallel universes separated by energy grids, and whether given the consequent continuous pulse theory of universe formation, there ever could to be said that there had been (or is or could be) a start point in time, and if so how would one define it (i.e. against which subjective or objective parameters) - then I go to the scientific search engines.
Trivia, trivia, obsessed with trivia.
Firstly, that depends on defining "best". I am quite happy with Start Page (i.e. Google without the record/detail retention) for simple matters. But when looking up more complex matters - such as today, I was checking the spacing of shell-layered parallel universes separated by energy grids, and whether given the consequent continuous pulse theory of universe formation, there ever could to be said that there had been (or is or could be) a start point in time, and if so how would one define it (i.e. against which subjective or objective parameters) - then I go to the scientific search engines.
Trivia, trivia, obsessed with trivia.
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Perth - Western Australia
Age: 75
Posts: 1,805
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I can remember the early days when Windoze 98 ruled supreme, and Alta Vista was THE search engine.
I can recall finding as much, if not more, with Alta Vista, than Google ever have (your results weren't censored, unlike Google - and if you don't realise that Google filter your results, even when you have "Safe Search" switched off, then you really are naive!)
What a shame that Alta Vista was hobbled and castrated by corporate scumbags intent on corporate aims and gains, rather than the development of a search engine that was a real force in searching the WWW - and long before Google began to rule the world.
I can recall finding as much, if not more, with Alta Vista, than Google ever have (your results weren't censored, unlike Google - and if you don't realise that Google filter your results, even when you have "Safe Search" switched off, then you really are naive!)
What a shame that Alta Vista was hobbled and castrated by corporate scumbags intent on corporate aims and gains, rather than the development of a search engine that was a real force in searching the WWW - and long before Google began to rule the world.
