Computer/Internet Issues & TroubleshootingAnyone with questions about the terribly complex world of computers or the internet should try here. We will also try and help with troubleshooting any technical problems you may have with the forums.
A useful technique, and because of it I settled for a slightly longer bottom ended zoom lens (28-135mm), is photo stitching, (google it for free software) Just shoot 2 overlapping pictures and then stitch them together, ok you get an elongated aspect ratio but that doesn't IMHO matter very much. For example these 2 were merged using photoshop. Not perfect but with more care taking the originals would have been better
It was all Ken Rockwell's fault. He said that he often doesn't bother taking anything but the 18 - 200. The world seems to listen to him.
Don't get me started on Rockwell. Since he negatively "reviewed" the camera I have (Pentax *ist DS) while happily admitting he had never even see one, he's been on the "no-fly" lists of many Pentax owners. He's also one of those who thinks your only camera choices are between Canon and Nikon = another reason to ignore him.
ps: if you have $38,000 spare, you might like one of these lenses:
As a complete novice in photography, but one who has a couple of nice (not SLR) digital cameras, is anyone able to recommend a beginners guide to photo editing? I find I don't even understand most of the terms used in the photo editing software, never mind how to use them.
As a complete novice in photography, but one who has a couple of nice (not SLR) digital cameras, is anyone able to recommend a beginners guide to photo editing? I find I don't even understand most of the terms used in the photo editing software, never mind how to use them.
If you are thinking of Photoshop or Photoshop Elements try the 'Missing Manual' series. Pretty comprehensive and very easy on the brain.
As a GA pilot first (when I used to fly and I should I say it I worked for the Oz regulator), I learned a couple of things.
1. All pilots understand technology.
2. Therefore, they normally understand computers (and other electronic devices).
3. When they fly they normally carry cameras with them and take pics.
4. Therefore the best pics of aircraft are normally taken by pilots.
5. But they also use programs like photoshop and manipulate pics to make them real good.
Many thanks. That has certainly given me somewhere to start. I have to admit that I have always found myself to have the kind of brain (such as it is) that needs to RTFM rather than wing it with occasional resort to the help file.
That lot will certainly keep me out of trouble for a while.
TT
RE the posts on the ND grad filter effects available in CS4 Adobe Camera Raw, the same tool is in Adobe Lightroom, which also uses ACR. It is a very useful feature. For a tutorial on it have a look here: Workshops-On-Demand
It is about three minutes into the tutorial.
I think the entire set of Lightroom tutorials are very worthwhile. If you were going to download the 30 day trial of Lightroom I would highly recommend looking at the tutorials before starting the 30 day clock ticking.
I attended a day seminar put on by JuliAnne Kost on Photoshop and she is simply excellent.
I must admit to liking lightroom, trouble is the last time i tried installing it into W 7 it screwed up the desk top icons, must try it with RC1 and see what happens.
That's a useful site innuendo thanks for posting it
Now that I've got some good glass and a spiffing flashgun, do I upgrade the camera?
Mine's a D50, and the 18 - 200 lens does seem to work quite well with it, but there's a bloke with a D200 for sale on Craig's listy thing, and I'm rather tempted. At a little over half the cost of a D90, it really seems to be a step forward. However, it doesn't seem to have the same 'Auto for Dummies' setting that the cheaper ones have.
$650 is the asking price for the body. There is a battery/grip with it as well. The thing is that the 90 seems to be getting rave reviews, and it has video and LCD sighting option. Quite a leap forward.
I think you'd do way better with the D90 than the D200, which is now 2 or 2.5 generations behind depending on how you squint. They all have "auto for dummies", but if that's your criterion I wonder why you're considering leaving the D50, which is also a fine camera.
I see the D3000 has a "Guide" mode that "provides in-camera assistance for making camera settings and utilizing professional techniques"
Last edited by Bushfiva : 16th August 2009 at 08:09.
Reason: D3000
I think it will be worth waiting for the D90. I mentioned your post to my wife, and she likes you - a lot. "we don't need to be spending money on non-essentials right now."
How do you explain to a mere woman, that a nifty camera is an essential?
To be honest, I think the raw vs jpeg argument will contine until the end of time, a bit like the Mac vs PC. I suppose it depends what you want to do with your images. One thing to bear in mind, if you do shoot in raw, make sure you have a lot of space to keep those files. Having said that, there is no substitute for a well taken photograph. Prepare, know your subject, and know your camera.
I do a bit of bird photography, specialising in a particular bird of prey. I shoot in the highest quality jpeg; I also sell my work, and provide images for publishing, and no comment (thus far!) has been made about the image being in jpeg format.
My one piece of advice would be to purchase the best quality lens you can afford. You won't regret it.
A rough guide to Raw v JPEG but as Helol says it will run and run
When to use Raw
You need to post process the image
The white balance cannot be properly set with the camera
The scene contains high contrast
The image will be enlarged beyond the camera sensor's resolution
You can't decide whether to use Raw or JPEG
You are using infra-red filters
When to use JPEG.
All the Raw files won't fit in your memory card
You don't want to post process the image
You want to print the photos right away before you get to use a computer
Some of those "problems" in the previous post are not necessarily problems at all, and can be viewed as opportunities for creative control of the final image. For example: is there really one "proper" white balance, and why should you be tied to whatever the camera (or photographer) decides at the time?
Analogy: if you make a print from a negative, you can fine-tune the image at that point, while going straight to JPEG can be compared to a Polaroid print: one shot, live with the results. I could put in another way: with digital media, you can easily throw away information, but once it's gone, you can not get it back.
Remember, JPEG uses lossy compression - it throws some information away. I'd reverse that advise: only use JPEG when you can't post-process, or really don't want to.
One more reason to shoot JPG is the number of frames per second is higher - this is probably due to the time it takes to write the frames and the buffer space available.
Linear Mode
