PPRuNe Forums


Canada The great white north. A BIG country with few people and LOTS of aviation.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 11th Dec 2016, 20:02   #1 (permalink)
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Kanata
Age: 63
Posts: 5,710
C-295 to replace the Buffalo

Evidently, a Made-in-Canada solution was not considered.


https://www.thestar.com/news/canada/...3-billion.html
evansb is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11th Dec 2016, 20:22   #2 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Ontario
Posts: 2
I think the only Canadian-built contender would have been the Dash 8-400.
Whittih is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12th Dec 2016, 00:07   #3 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Nirvana South
Posts: 704
Some Air Forces already operate the CL415 in the SAR role. Would have thought there was an advantage to having an amphibious capability.
ICT_SLB is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17th Dec 2016, 12:25   #4 (permalink)
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Kanata
Age: 63
Posts: 5,710
The dearth of responses on this tread is telling of the Canadian psyche.
evansb is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17th Dec 2016, 14:39   #5 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: yyz
Posts: 559
The Canadian content is supplied by tatataaaa"trumpets" PWC in Longueil , PQ.............Republic of Western Canada is looking better, and better.
rigpiggy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18th Dec 2016, 21:28   #6 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: Canada
Posts: 40
The DHC-8-400 was probably too big for the mission requirements. I thought the same, but at the end of the day, the fleet was in need of an upgrade and a more modern and very capable aircraft was chosen.
CEA330Driver is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19th Dec 2016, 14:31   #7 (permalink)
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Canada
Posts: 43
DHC

The requirement for a ramp is what nuked the Dash series.
Viper 7 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26th Dec 2016, 14:21   #8 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Texas
Posts: 7
Some have floated the concept of a modernized Buffalo, but the development time to add modern engines would have been excessive and you would still have an unpressurized tube meaning extremely uncomfortable transit flights. Not really a viable option.
alexguru is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29th Dec 2016, 19:36   #9 (permalink)
32A
 
Join Date: Sep 1998
Location: CYQQ
Posts: 3
Long story short. There were three bidders, Leonardo with C27J, Embraer with KC390, and Airbus with C295W. Contract is not only for aircraft but also infrastructure, maintenance support, and training. Contract includes extensive industrial and technological trade benefits. There are major Canadian sub-contractors involved, like PAL, P&W, and CAE.

All potential providers had the opportunity to consider the requirements, submit feedback, and submit bids. We can discuss our favourite FWSAR contenders all we want, but if they did not enter a bid, they weren't considered in the final assessment.

As a retired FWSAR pilot, I am most appreciative the gov't made a decision replacing the aged CC115 Buffalo and CC130H fleets as opposed to dragging out this procurement process like many others.

http://www.tpsgc-pwgsc.gc.ca/app-acq...index-eng.html

Last edited by 32A; 29th Dec 2016 at 19:38. Reason: Add PWGSC link
32A is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT. The time now is 07:08.


1996-2012 The Professional Pilots Rumour Network

SEO by vBSEO 3.6.1