PPRuNe Forums

Go Back   PPRuNe Forums > Other Aircrew Forums > Cabin Crew
Forgotten your Username/Password?
PPRuNe Email Register FAQ Calendar Advertise Mark Forums Read

Cabin Crew The other half of the airborne team who put up with the self-loading freight.


Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 1st July 2006, 13:04   #1 (permalink)
bushbolox
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: lgw
Posts: 140
BA Crew/Dodgy NY Hotel.

I read an article yesterday that some BA crew were on a disciplinary for not turning in for a JFK/LHR citing fatigue after staying in an alleged flea pit/ whore house on a layover. Other crews reported not to have issues or at least turned in sparking the action by the managers. Anyone heard anything.Its a jolly good rumour.

bushbolox is offline  
Old 2nd July 2006, 01:49   #2 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Jetting across the universe..
Posts: 257
Quote:
Originally Posted by bushbolox
I read an article yesterday that some BA crew were on a disciplinary for not turning in for a JFK/LHR citing fatigue after staying in an alleged flea pit/ whore house on a layover. Other crews reported not to have issues or at least turned in sparking the action by the managers. Anyone heard anything.Its a jolly good rumour.
I think it was due to irregular ops at JFK which meant that flights were all over the place. The crew is question was sent to a hotel which wasn't the normal one, and turned out to be quite dubious. As they felt they hadn't got sufficient rest they would not operate the flight. On face value, it seems a fair enough desicion!
EI-CFC is offline  
Old 2nd July 2006, 07:54   #3 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: lgw
Posts: 140
It would seem the management think differently.
bushbolox is offline  
Old 3rd July 2006, 22:57   #4 (permalink)
Probationary PPRuNer
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: London
Posts: 31
Purser involved is apparently a known trouble causer/rabble rouser.
BTSM is offline  
Old 3rd July 2006, 23:04   #5 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: London
Posts: 282
Can I remind you all that you cannot hide behind posts made on here. Becareful what you say/imply.
OzzieO is offline  
Old 3rd July 2006, 23:16   #6 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: uk
Age: 53
Posts: 33
Quote:
Originally Posted by EI-CFC
I think it was due to irregular ops at JFK which meant that flights were all over the place. The crew is question was sent to a hotel which wasn't the normal one, and turned out to be quite dubious. As they felt they hadn't got sufficient rest they would not operate the flight. On face value, it seems a fair enough desicion!
I understand the place they were put in was the Diplomat Motor Inn in Long Island. The website probably tells you all you need to know! http://www.dmimotel.com/
FloridaCandle is offline  
Old 4th July 2006, 01:27   #7 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Jetting across the universe..
Posts: 257
Looks classy..think I'll put it on my wish list!

Last edited by EI-CFC : 4th July 2006 at 13:55.
EI-CFC is offline  
Old 4th July 2006, 03:00   #8 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 316
This reminds me of a fact has always amazed me -
(I have to admit, to a certain extent, I am guilty of this myself)
When travelling as crew (Company paying) only the very best will suffice. Any drop in service levels are usualy met with hostility. However, when travelling as a passenger on leave, we will make do with the hotel that offeres us the cheapest deal! (as a rule)
The same can be said for inter base ground transport. Because we are usualy provided with specialized firms offering crew transport, should we have to occassionly take a standard taxi for a ride to the hotel, many crew seem to create hell - safety etc! Ofcourse, when off duty and you call a taxi home from the pub, its no big deal!
SASKATOON9999 is offline  
Old 4th July 2006, 11:29   #9 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: London
Posts: 1,652
Well I have flown with two of the crew members involved and by all sounds of things, it was a very awful situation that they were placed in and the two I spoke to are certainly NOT troublemaker types!!!

Just remember all of you before you start bashing BA for this. Your company will be watching the outcome of this and WILL use it against any of you should you be in a situation similiar where you need to go Fatigue. Unfortunatly BA management have forgotten that to claim fatigue is not something we do because we had a few too many pints the night before BUT a very last resort in the event that there was no way for us to get adequate rest in order to operate a flight safely.

Get behind the JFK 6 everyone. It is in your own best interest, especially to those of you in the UK.
apaddyinuk is offline  
Old 5th July 2006, 14:30   #10 (permalink)
Probationary PPRuNer
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: London
Posts: 31
Someone on the BALPA BA forum is reporting that the hotel are considering legal action against BASSA for libel.
BTSM is offline  
Old 5th July 2006, 14:38   #11 (permalink)

FX Guru
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Greenwich.
Age: 52
Posts: 490
So please tread very carefully folks. This is an interesting thread, but we don't want more lawyers sending letters to Danny!
angels is offline  
Old 5th July 2006, 15:39   #12 (permalink)
Da Dog
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Sussex
Posts: 194
Is my understanding after talking to BASSA rep that BTSM info is correct with regard to one of the persons involved.

Da Dog is offline  

Closed Thread


Thread Tools
Display Modes


Posting Rules
vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:10.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC7
© 1996-2008 The Professional Pilots Rumour Network

As these are anonymous forums the origins of the contributions may be opposite to what may be apparent. In fact the press may use it, or the unscrupulous, or sciolists*, to elicit certain reactions.

*"sciolist"... Noun, archaic. "a person who pretends to be knowledgeable and well informed".