Age 65 and flyibg on NCC, M or VP
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: London
Posts: 80
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
S
The heart attack rates are highest between 50 and 60 then tail off but there is no evidence based reason to EASA regulations too much perceived threat rather than demonstrated threat protection.
They will do as they wish unless someone says no and challenges them in the EU courts and that is the problem.
As with 3rd country licences that works and its not the EU courts but a serious threat of EU courts which will often suffice and remember it is the commission not EASA who decide! EASA are rule makers not instigators
Pace
The heart attack rates are highest between 50 and 60 then tail off but there is no evidence based reason to EASA regulations too much perceived threat rather than demonstrated threat protection.
They will do as they wish unless someone says no and challenges them in the EU courts and that is the problem.
As with 3rd country licences that works and its not the EU courts but a serious threat of EU courts which will often suffice and remember it is the commission not EASA who decide! EASA are rule makers not instigators
Pace
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: London
Posts: 80
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
S
The heart attack rates are highest between 50 and 60 then tail off but there is no evidence based reason to EASA regulations too much perceived threat rather than demonstrated threat protection.
They will do as they wish unless someone says no and challenges them in the EU courts and that is the problem.
As with 3rd country licences that works and its not the EU courts but a serious threat of EU courts which will often suffice and remember it is the commission not EASA who decide! EASA are rule makers not instigators
Pace
The heart attack rates are highest between 50 and 60 then tail off but there is no evidence based reason to EASA regulations too much perceived threat rather than demonstrated threat protection.
They will do as they wish unless someone says no and challenges them in the EU courts and that is the problem.
As with 3rd country licences that works and its not the EU courts but a serious threat of EU courts which will often suffice and remember it is the commission not EASA who decide! EASA are rule makers not instigators
Pace
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,306
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Sorry Purple Pitot, but Im banking on the Greeks to destroy the EU so everyone one can go back to beings Brits, French ect, but try not to get into another punch up with you know who, it just makes things so messy!
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: in the wild blue yonder
Posts: 131
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The rarest living creature on Earth....
..a human who likes the EU...and thinks EASA is doing a good job.
(Note: I don't count bureaucrats as humans...more as a type of virus that infects us.)
..a human who likes the EU...and thinks EASA is doing a good job.
(Note: I don't count bureaucrats as humans...more as a type of virus that infects us.)
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: uk
Posts: 193
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Sadly someone has to challenge them
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,306
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Had a "Bull Sesion" at a local airport yesterday, there were seven pilots over sixty five present, all were still flying both full and part time, lots of youngsters as well ,most of whoom want to keep going. With our low birth rate it just makes good buisines sense to keep flying beyond sixty, I myself, am about ready to "pull the pin" so as to spend more time with our toys { very old flying machines}and grand kids, but still enjoy going to work.
