PPRuNe Forums

Go Back   PPRuNe Forums > Non-Airline Forums > Biz Jets, Ag Flying, GA etc.
Forgotten your Username/Password?
Register FAQ Calendar Advertise Mark Forums Read

Biz Jets, Ag Flying, GA etc. The place for discussion of issues related to corporate, Ag and GA aviation. If you're a professional pilot and don't fly for the airlines then try here.


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 2nd July 2009, 22:30   #1 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: uk
Posts: 6
Aerial survey work

Hi everyone - well here goes my first ever post, although I have followed Prune for many years without registering. Please go easy on me, I did my homework but couldn't find an answer to my specific question so would really appreciate some help...

I am considering undertaking some aerial survey work which has an 'environmental' focus; specifically the task is to count seabird populations over open water and coastal areas. This is not new stuff, but I can't ask the people who already do it as they might break my legs.

I have a current ATPL and medical etc (I fly for a UK airline), and my mate is a biologist who is qualified to do all the bird-spotting. The work would be done for a third party who would pay us for the scientific report. I assume that if I get some sort of rating I could hire an aircraft from somewhere.

Having read other threads and been very lost on the CAA website, I still don't understand how this activity would be defined: I guess it would be 'aerial work' (is my ATPL OK for this?), but opinion seems to differ as to whether such flying would require an AOC. I hope not, but wonder whether my buddy would be classified as a passenger? He would be responsible for a lot of the navigation so perhaps he is a crewmember as you could argue he would be in an operating capacity?

What about aircraft insurance and CofA - does anyone know the requirements? I have no intention of being economical with the truth regarding the real use of the aircraft.

Very grateful if anyone can help clarify a very confusing area - I'd really like to have some understanding of the rules before I go any further. Do you think I should speak to the CAA?

Thanks in advance!
whydowebother is offline   Reply
Old 3rd July 2009, 08:35   #2 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: France
Age: 61
Posts: 339
Just to start the ball rolling - and you may get as many answers as responses with this being a very grey area in my view - I would suggest you do contact the CAA GA department. Their telephone number used to be 01293 573524. In my day, some 10 years ago, Bob Commander there was very helpful. Others may advise you to avoid contacting the CAA as they are regarded as 'the enemy' by some, but I feel that would be the safest course.

Perhaps someone who is more au fait with current CAA thinking on this type of activity can offer some further input here.

Good luck.
Expressflight is offline   Reply
Old 6th July 2009, 17:18   #3 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: uk
Posts: 6
Thanks for the advice, think I will call them. As far as I can make out, having read the ANO section and some CAA leaflets, it all hinges around the definition of 'passenger', and whether or not you could argue that the scientist is essential to the outcome of the exercise rather than being the purpose of it. All a bit woolly, so I wondered if anybody out there has experience of a precedent?
whydowebother is offline   Reply
Old 7th July 2009, 09:39   #4 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 135
Take care where you will be surveying and at what height. There are a lot of military (and civil) aircraft operating at the levels that you might be flying at.
With 1/2 the crew looking at birds the other half needs to doubling their lookout efforts.
Get some advice from the CAA about a NOTAM for your flights.
bayete is offline   Reply
Old 7th July 2009, 10:49   #5 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: UK
Posts: 95
fish

I'd agree with consulting the CAA as the first port of call.

Also bear in mind that, at the moment, Things Are Changing. Regarding the definition of crew/passenger, it has always been woolly. And if I'm honest, I think the CAA knew that too and on occasional were ambiguous or even contradictory. However EASA is taking over and generally, aerial work doesn't look like it will be afforded the same level of wooly-ness as perhaps it has in the past - at least not at the moment.

So crew might be those required by aircraft certification only (i.e. just you), or include "flight attendants, examiners and those authorised to conduct tests" which was another one I heard, or anybody except fare-paying punters. Which way is the wind blowing today?

I fly survey for a client across Europe. In the past it's always been Aerial Work. Now, they're looking at whether they need to use an operator with an AOC simply because they're missing out on winning work due to our lack of one. National Authorities are increasingly asking for one before issuing survey permits, even though in the past it was considered 'too much' and not necessary.

The CAA published a document in 2005 called "Summary of the Meaning of Public Transport & Aerial Work". It may help, it may not. Going forward under EASA, it may become irrelevant. Click here.

As for low-level stuff, I agree with Bayete. Use the CANP procedures if applicable. Consider putting two pairs of eyes in the front seats if your own lookout with be compromised (eyes-in/eyes-down guidance systems, for example). Even at low-speeds, it can be startling how quickly you can end up in someone else's face if you're not giving the outside world the correct attention. Trust me; been there, done that.

If you're hiring an aircraft, I'd make sure it was on a Public CofA at a minimum (or whatever the new EASA equivalent of that is), to cover one's backside.

HTH - good luck.
Charley is offline   Reply
Old 7th July 2009, 15:16   #6 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: london
Posts: 62
The CAA don't seem to bother trying to stop FAA reg aircraft doing whatever they want over here so just rent an N-reg.

and he runs for cover
Vanpilot is offline   Reply
Old 7th July 2009, 15:33   #7 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: UK
Posts: 95
Well, aircraft of any nationality can undertake aerial work in the UK provided they hold a valid permit from the Department of Transport to do so and as long as they operate in accordance with the relevant parts of the ANO.

(Vanpilot - how's that hook looking?)
Charley is offline   Reply
Old 7th July 2009, 15:56   #8 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Near the sun
Posts: 714
Small detail but if you work for a UK airline, you probably hold a Multipilot rating... Which is not the same if you want to fly a chieftain. No biggy but good to know for business planning purposes .
AMEX is offline   Reply
Old 7th July 2009, 17:20   #9 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: uk
Posts: 6
Great advice everyone, thanks. Didn't know about the 'multi-crew' rating thing; the relevant bits on the ratings page of my license are 'ME Piston (Land)' and 'IR-SPA-ME', I did my test on a Beech Duchess so was assuming that I'd be OK to hire something similar and fly it by myself - is this assumption true?

I'm starting to wonder whether getting an AOC might be the way ahead but am daunted by the prospect - is it too much for an individual to achieve do you think? Also I guess it will cost a fortune. Will the CAA want to know which aeroplane I am going to fly (i.e. the reg no), and who maintains it etc, or can you get an AOC to operate without specifying which aircraft you will be using?

Guess I'll have to call them soon, but it's as well to know as many of the facts first, or else I imagine it will be easy to be dismissed by someone who is too busy to speak to an unprepared muppet
whydowebother is offline   Reply
Old 7th July 2009, 17:24   #10 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: South
Posts: 76
Anyhow ops should be day and VMC only as birds are not flying in IMC or at night (usually...)

So a single engine A/C or a light twin will be enough, so no big deal for any rating.
BlueVolta is offline   Reply
Old 7th July 2009, 18:06   #11 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Near the sun
Posts: 714
SPA is for Single Pilot Aeroplane but because you said you were working for an airline, I understood by that, that all your renewals were on MPA (multi Pilots aeroplane) hence your SPA could have lapsed.

I am not a specialist mind you but thought this kind of "gotchas" are great at delaying people plans, more than difficult to get sorted.
AMEX is offline   Reply
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes


Posting Rules
vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 13:56.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC7
© 1996-2009 The Professional Pilots Rumour Network

As these are anonymous forums the origins of the contributions may be opposite to what may be apparent. In fact the press may use it, or the unscrupulous, or sciolists*, to elicit certain reactions.

*"sciolist"... Noun, archaic. "a person who pretends to be knowledgeable and well informed".