PPRuNe Forums

Go Back   PPRuNe Forums > Non-Airline Forums > Biz Jets, Ag Flying, GA etc.
Forgotten your Username/Password?
PPRuNe Email Register FAQ Calendar Advertise Mark Forums Read

Biz Jets, Ag Flying, GA etc. The place for discussion of issues related to corporate, Ag and GA aviation. If you're a professional pilot and don't fly for the airlines then try here.


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10th June 2008, 20:57   #1 (permalink)
VickersV
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: uk
Posts: 9
Offshore aircraft registration

Does anyone have any information regarding the benefits of having an offshore registration such as that in the IOM like the M- registration,are you escaping VAT?also is it true you can operate under FAA regulations even though it is under CAA Juristiction??

VickersV is offline  
Reply
Old 10th June 2008, 21:15   #2 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: UK
Posts: 144
Give the IOM DTI a call. They are very helpful indeed. An entirely different experience to dealing with our 'friends' at Gatwick.....
Tel + 44 (0) 1624 682358

READY MESSAGE is offline   Reply
Old 10th June 2008, 21:27   #3 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Location Location
Age: 38
Posts: 640
As far as M reg is concerned

0% Corporation tax
0% Insurance premium tax
FAA Licenses accepted
Not sure about any vat savings or benefits
Slightly more pragmatic attitude for non EASA mods on imported aircraft
Dont be drawn in on FAA Maintenance its JAR145 - line engineers need Manx validations.
M-Reg is sold as politically neutral - not going to apply with all those company coffee cup rings on your tail!
Head office for IOM is 8.30am till 5.30 and a stones throw from 'NL not 3500 miles and 6 time zones away

Last edited by G-SPOTs Lost : 10th June 2008 at 21:42.
G-SPOTs Lost is offline   Reply
Old 12th June 2008, 01:10   #4 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: uk
Posts: 9
Very informative and fascinating,i'm intrigued to find out more about the FAA aspect,is it operating those registration's outside Jar-ops,can you use FAA licenced crew and maintenance?
Thanks
VickersV is offline   Reply
Old 12th June 2008, 01:27   #5 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: MAN
Posts: 143
You can fly N or VP-reg with FAA crew and using FAA engineers to your hearts content throughout the EU.

Corporations decide to register aircraft within the EU for tax, business and political reasons.

In the UK there is only VAT on importation of aircraft under MTOW of 8,000 kgs. There are VAT implications on the use of aircraft within the EU and there are VAT implications on the Temporary Import of private and business aircraft within the EU.

VAT and tax issues relating to the import and operation of aircraft are so complicated in the EU that they warrant an in depth consultation with an accountant.

There are further VAT and tax implications on the importation of aircaft spares and parts, on the fuel, on the use even if intercompany or private.
cldrvr is offline   Reply
Old 12th June 2008, 12:54   #6 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Green Hills of England
Posts: 289
The state of registration of an airframe and its VAT status in Europe are utterly unrelated.
flyingfemme is offline   Reply
Old 12th June 2008, 12:57   #7 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: MAN
Posts: 143
Actually, if you register an aircraft of less then 8,000kgs in the UK VAT payment is due, if you on the other hand register said aircraft in Denmark for example no VAT payment is due, that's why Denmark is so popular as an importation country into the EU.

Last edited by cldrvr : 12th June 2008 at 13:07.
cldrvr is offline   Reply
Old 12th June 2008, 17:57   #8 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: UK
Posts: 79
Quote:
Actually, if you register an aircraft of less then 8,000kgs in the UK VAT payment is due,
As said previously - Not True. If the aircraft is not being imported into the EU then no VAT is due - it can be G- reg and in the Channel Islands. If you register in Denmark but import it direct into the UK then VAT would be due. The registration mark has nothing to do with VAT status, it's all down to where it is based ,who is using it and the weight.
ifonly is offline   Reply
Old 12th June 2008, 19:25   #9 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Location Location
Age: 38
Posts: 640
Not forgetting the new GST in Jersey 6%!

WRT FAA Maintenance, dont be under any illusions, you may be able to adopt a FAA program, but you will need a suitable contracted organisation to implement it who will need manx approval, assuming your line maintenance is not going to be done by a member of that organisation, he/she will need to be licensed on type and have a manx validation. Otherwise you may under certain circumstances be able to have a non typed guy possibly perform certain tasks with an A&P but for each task he will need to have received training for each from your 145 place and he will need to be validated.

Its not as straightfoward as some might have you believe, the main benefits for the M reg are ease of use on the rare occasions that you need to speak to them. RVSM/MNPS approvals are a joy to apply for.

Would second Ready Message's suggestion and give the Director a call and speak to him directly, last time I rang in he actually answered the call himself after 4 rings!

The IPT saving is a significant sum in itself
G-SPOTs Lost is offline   Reply
Old 12th June 2008, 21:10   #10 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Bristol
Age: 39
Posts: 586
Going back to the Denmark method, am I right in thinking that a percentage charge is levied as oppose to a VAT? Anyone heard of a similar process for Finland?

Phil
Phil Brockwell is offline   Reply
Old 12th June 2008, 22:38   #11 (permalink)
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Redistributing SLF
Age: 50
Posts: 270
Would there be a benefit for a U.S. contract pilot to get a IOM license? TC
AA717driver is offline   Reply
Old 12th June 2008, 23:14   #12 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: UK
Posts: 79
Quote:
am I right in thinking that a percentage charge is levied as oppose to a VAT?
Phil - there is no charge by the Danish Government. The only fee is charged by the 'specialist' companies who charge for doing a job that any decent freight agent could do.

Not heard of anything similar in Finland it would depend on their VAT rate for aircraft.
ifonly is offline   Reply
Old 13th June 2008, 00:09   #13 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Location Location
Age: 38
Posts: 640
AA717

There is not a manx license per se, the validation is issued for you to fly a specific aircraft.

The manx registry appears to want to know who is flying what and for whom.

The paperwork for a validation is the usual license/medical but then in addition RVSM/MNPS proof of training and interestingly a letter of request from the airframe operator.

You get a validation for that airframe for that operator, the validation remains with the aircraft documents.

If you get a gig on a M reg aircraft, if its a rush job they will scan the validation into a computer file and email it to you, normally that day. Say if you needed it in 60 minutes knowing the individuals involved they would probably oblige.
G-SPOTs Lost is offline   Reply
Old 13th June 2008, 13:50   #14 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: uk
Posts: 9
So if your flying a M- registered aircraft could you effectively use Faa licenced crew,so they would just need to get an iom endorsement to operate the aircraft?
Also can you operate these aircraft commercially or just in private ops?
VickersV is offline   Reply
Old 13th June 2008, 14:40   #15 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Bristol
Age: 39
Posts: 586
M Reg is for Private ops only.

Phil
Phil Brockwell is offline   Reply
Old 13th June 2008, 16:51   #16 (permalink)
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Redistributing SLF
Age: 50
Posts: 270
Thanks, G-SPOT! I'm headed toward the contract world and figured the more countries' endorsements the better. TC
AA717driver is offline   Reply
Old 15th June 2008, 10:45   #17 (permalink)
VickersV
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: uk
Posts: 9
Why can you not operate commercially on the IOM register??

VickersV is offline  
Reply
Old 15th June 2008, 11:19   #18 (permalink)
G-SPOTs Lost
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Location Location
Age: 38
Posts: 640
The oversight burden would be too much for the IOM, they are a small unit within the IOM DTi, commercial ops is not where they want to be.

They are looking for professionally run private operators, they have initially contracted out their airworthiness department to Baines and Simmons to give them the full functionality from day 1. But the fact that they have subcontracted away (for the time being) 1/2 their ANO so to speak gives you an idea about the scale of the IOM ACR

They dont want to become the CAA - thats a good thing

Now if a large fractional Subpart K operator decided to commence ops / switch over to the IOM then they might look at it.

Its a prestige thing that puts the IOM firmly in the front of CEO/Chairmans minds. The IOM superyacht register has been a tremendous success, with nearly 60 yachts registered and the A/c registry well on track to having 100 a/c registered by the end of 08

G-SPOTs Lost is offline  
Reply
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes


Posting Rules
vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Gulf Air aircraft re-registration Panama Jack Middle East 5 22nd May 2007 00:24
Aircraft countries of registration flystarboy Airlines, Airports & Routes 4 28th July 2004 17:24
Columbian aircraft registration Squawk7777 The Caribbean and Latin America 4 25th February 2004 01:43
Aircraft Registration changes PorcoRosso Tech Log 2 16th November 2001 23:49
Aircraft re-registration tech...again Questions 5 18th March 2001 00:17


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:38.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC7
© 1996-2008 The Professional Pilots Rumour Network

As these are anonymous forums the origins of the contributions may be opposite to what may be apparent. In fact the press may use it, or the unscrupulous, or sciolists*, to elicit certain reactions.

*"sciolist"... Noun, archaic. "a person who pretends to be knowledgeable and well informed".