Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Misc. Forums > Aviation History and Nostalgia
Reload this Page >

47yo 747-100 finally retires

Wikiposts
Search
Aviation History and Nostalgia Whether working in aviation, retired, wannabee or just plain fascinated this forum welcomes all with a love of flight.

47yo 747-100 finally retires

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 24th Aug 2017, 08:29
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: BRS/GVA
Posts: 342
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
47yo 747-100 finally retires

Oldest flying 747 finally grounded, 47 years after first flight ? The Register
hoss183 is offline  
Old 24th Aug 2017, 09:11
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Seat 1A
Posts: 8,561
Received 76 Likes on 44 Posts
I assume they didn't use the current Boeing crosswind landing technique of crossing it up at 200ft and landing wing-down with that mother on the LHS...
Capn Bloggs is offline  
Old 25th Aug 2017, 10:39
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Lincolnshire UK
Posts: 178
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I wonder which airframe now has the claim to be the oldest airworthy 747?
AirportsEd is offline  
Old 25th Aug 2017, 13:03
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Reading, UK
Posts: 15,826
Received 206 Likes on 94 Posts
Originally Posted by AirportsEd
I wonder which airframe now has the claim to be the oldest airworthy 747?
Probably this one:



Photo taken six months ago.

EP-CQB (19667) first flew July 1969, though it wasn't delivered (to TWA) until about a year later.
DaveReidUK is online now  
Old 26th Aug 2017, 07:57
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 249
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Do I see a flying boom at the tail end? Was this an aerial tanker?
washoutt is offline  
Old 26th Aug 2017, 08:33
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: London
Posts: 7,072
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Iranian Air Force

http://foxtrotalpha.jalopnik.com/the...n-a-1581314071
Heathrow Harry is offline  
Old 26th Aug 2017, 08:47
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Hampshire
Age: 76
Posts: 821
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Airfleets info shows 5 or 6 still "Active" with the Iranian Air Force of a similar age. What about the GE engine test bed N747GE? Although based at Victorville, it has apparently been seen at Xiamen in 2015 with a new GE livery.
KelvinD is offline  
Old 26th Aug 2017, 08:48
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Reading, UK
Posts: 15,826
Received 206 Likes on 94 Posts
Originally Posted by washoutt
Do I see a flying boom at the tail end? Was this an aerial tanker?
DaveReidUK is online now  
Old 26th Aug 2017, 08:51
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Reading, UK
Posts: 15,826
Received 206 Likes on 94 Posts
Originally Posted by KelvinD
What about the GE engine test bed N747GE? Although based at Victorville, it has apparently been seen at Xiamen in 2015 with a new GE livery.
That's the one referred to in post #1 - though in fact it wasn't the oldest flying 747 after all.
DaveReidUK is online now  
Old 26th Aug 2017, 09:18
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Hampshire
Age: 76
Posts: 821
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thanks for that Dave.
KelvinD is offline  
Old 27th Aug 2017, 08:14
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 249
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Thanks for all the intersting info on the tanker 747.
washoutt is offline  
Old 27th Aug 2017, 08:59
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Reading, UK
Posts: 15,826
Received 206 Likes on 94 Posts
A bit more digging around suggests that the AirTeamImages photo is wrongly captioned and isn't EP-CQB (which is still the oldest 747 flying, but doesn't have a boom).

The tanker is a slightly newer (1970) aircraft, also originally delivered to TWA.
DaveReidUK is online now  
Old 28th Aug 2017, 02:14
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Malaysia
Posts: 158
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I've been on board that 747 tanker when it was painted in IRIAF colours. The last pallet position (Usually called Tango) was the boom operators station with a face down padded bunch.

There was also a receptacle in the nose to receive fuel as well. The maindeck was your usual 747 freighter but with locks to accommodate military pallets (88x108 I think) rather than civil 96/88 x 125 pallets.

Anilv
Anilv is offline  
Old 28th Aug 2017, 07:53
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: London
Posts: 7,072
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
weren't these the conversion that exploded a couple of times - once in IRAF service and one converted back by TWA in revenue service??
Heathrow Harry is offline  
Old 28th Aug 2017, 07:56
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: London
Posts: 7,072
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Interestingly last weeks "Flight" shows there are only 8 747-200's in revenue service and two 727-100's, two YS-11's but SIX DC-3's...............
Heathrow Harry is offline  
Old 22nd Nov 2017, 20:36
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: nowhere
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Heathrow Harry
weren't these the conversion that exploded a couple of times - once in IRAF service and one converted back by TWA in revenue service??
Not TWA but it appears that The Imperial Iranian Air Force 747 was a tanker. And I now finally have a conclusion as to why this aircraft exploded when hit by lightning. It wasn't just a regular 747, it had a heavily modified fuel system which makes it more understandable why it exploded, even if the exact details of why remain unknown.
JammedStab is offline  
Old 22nd Nov 2017, 22:39
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Reading, UK
Posts: 15,826
Received 206 Likes on 94 Posts
Originally Posted by JammedStab
Not TWA but it appears that The Imperial Iranian Air Force 747 was a tanker. And I now finally have a conclusion as to why this aircraft exploded when hit by lightning. It wasn't just a regular 747, it had a heavily modified fuel system which makes it more understandable why it exploded, even if the exact details of why remain unknown.
The IIAF 747 that exploded in May 1976 was a freighter, not a tanker, and the investigation (in which the NTSB participated) did not identify any non-standard modifications to the fuel system.
DaveReidUK is online now  
Old 23rd Nov 2017, 11:22
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Reading, UK
Posts: 15,826
Received 206 Likes on 94 Posts
Originally Posted by button push ignored
I hope they are not counting the two YS-11’s that are Mexican registered out of El Paso Texas. One does fly occasionally, but it’s not a viable operation.

The 727-100s. I wonder if one is ex JY-AHS, VR-CHS?
The two YS-11s in the Flight census are shown as operated by Alcon, not identified but presumably one is -300 XA-TND (2073), though I have no idea what the other one could be.

The two B721s consist of one each for Lyca Cargo (TY-FSJ 19011) and LAS Colombia (HK-1271 19524).

The former JY-AHS/VR-CHS isn't included as it's outside the scope of the Flight census, which only covers airline-operated aircraft.
DaveReidUK is online now  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.