Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Misc. Forums > Aviation History and Nostalgia
Reload this Page >

BEA Trident London - Moscow 1971

Wikiposts
Search
Aviation History and Nostalgia Whether working in aviation, retired, wannabee or just plain fascinated this forum welcomes all with a love of flight.

BEA Trident London - Moscow 1971

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 16th Jul 2016, 16:51
  #61 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Reading, UK
Posts: 15,816
Received 201 Likes on 93 Posts
Even without the booster engine, three Speys vs two was only ever going to have one outcome.
DaveReidUK is offline  
Old 19th Jul 2016, 19:39
  #62 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Reading, UK
Posts: 15,816
Received 201 Likes on 93 Posts
As a postscript to the Trident 3 booster engine decommissioning debate, I've been re-reading Max Kingsley-Jones's excellent monograph on the Trident.

He recounts a jump seat trip he made to Oslo during the last month of BA Trident operations (December 1985), where the boost engine was used not just on the return leg (where it was essential in the Norwegian winter) but also on takeoff at LHR to confirm its serviceability.

The book contains a number of photos of the RB162 in action (discernable by the open intake doors), including a May 1986 shot of the last of the 5 T3s sold to ACS of Zaire, which was the last ever Trident flight from LHR.


DaveReidUK is offline  
Old 20th Jul 2016, 08:44
  #63 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Kerry Eire
Age: 76
Posts: 609
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
There's some pretty solid evidence then. "He recounts a jump seat trip he made to Oslo during the last month of BA Trident operations (December 1985), where the boost engine was used not just on the return leg (where it was essential in the Norwegian winter) but also on takeoff at LHR to confirm its serviceability" could be taken as confirming the irregular use of the engine. I just wonder if the flight would have been pulled had the RB162 decided not to co-operate.

The aircraft sold to Zaire were 'ZC, 'ZD, 'ZF and 'ZG with 'ZV as a spares back up. None were regular shuttle performers through the 1980s so presumably their RB162s were not decommissioned and they were allocated to European routes.
philbky is offline  
Old 20th Jul 2016, 09:34
  #64 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Reading, UK
Posts: 15,816
Received 201 Likes on 93 Posts
Originally Posted by philbky
There's some pretty solid evidence then. "He recounts a jump seat trip he made to Oslo during the last month of BA Trident operations (December 1985), where the boost engine was used not just on the return leg (where it was essential in the Norwegian winter) but also on takeoff at LHR to confirm its serviceability" could be taken as confirming the irregular use of the engine. I just wonder if the flight would have been pulled had the RB162 decided not to co-operate.
Yes, he quotes the station engineer at OSL as saying that if it had arrived there on that occasion with a u/s boost engine it wouldn't have been able to depart.

I was simply quoting that extract as evidence that the T3 boost engine was being used, as and when required, right up to the end of BA Trident operations, which I think we're now agreed on.
DaveReidUK is offline  
Old 20th Jul 2016, 15:16
  #65 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: se england
Posts: 1,579
Likes: 0
Received 48 Likes on 21 Posts
I do not know all the airfields the T3 had to have boost engine reasons of short runway alone rather weight hot weather etc for other than EDI before the new runway and Oslo Fornebu any other offers.

If i cd drift the thread a little goijg bck to start about BEA and BOAC doing Moscow in the BALHR T3 lounge there is a poster saying fly BOAC to the Helsinki Olympics, could that be right.
pax britanica is offline  
Old 20th Jul 2016, 16:18
  #66 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: London UK
Posts: 7,651
Likes: 0
Received 18 Likes on 15 Posts
Originally Posted by pax britanica
I do not know all the airfields the T3 had to have boost engine reasons of short runway alone rather weight hot weather etc for other than EDI before the new runway and Oslo Fornebu any other offers.
I doubt the T3 operated into Edinburgh before the new runway was built (always open to correction of course). I was in Edinburgh in the 1970s, and the justification for the new runway was very much that the old one could not take BEA Tridents (BUA were already using One-Elevens). Once construction was agreed, however, Trident 1Cs were first infiltrated and then took over from Vanguards, the last of which was withdrawn in Spring 1974, with Edinburgh one of its last routes. Spring 1976 the route was converted to a Shuttle, but at that time the Shuttle fleet was all 100-seat Trident 1C. A year later in Spring 1977 the new runway and terminal was opened, and I think only after that would the T3 have come along there. Certainly all the early 1980s trips I did on the Edinburgh Shuttle were still with a Trident 1C.

If i cd drift the thread a little goijg bck to start about BEA and BOAC doing Moscow in the BALHR T3 lounge there is a poster saying fly BOAC to the Helsinki Olympics, could that be right.
Bit of a challenge as the Olympics there were in 1952. BOAC never served Helsinki, and BEA schedules in 1952 got no nearer than Stockholm, although they doubtless did some special flights. Nor did Aero (Finnair predecessor) come to London as their first Convair 440s were not delivered until the following year. Was the poster aimed more generally, at Americans coming to Europe that summer ? I think this is it

http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/1952-BOAC-...-/291411463505
WHBM is online now  
Old 20th Jul 2016, 16:50
  #67 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Reading, UK
Posts: 15,816
Received 201 Likes on 93 Posts
Originally Posted by WHBM
I doubt the T3 operated into Edinburgh before the new runway was built (always open to correction of course).
Indeed it did.

SOP was full reverse coming over the fence, as was the case for other short fields it operated into.
DaveReidUK is offline  
Old 20th Jul 2016, 17:06
  #68 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Manchester MAN
Posts: 6,643
Received 74 Likes on 46 Posts
Dave,

How did that get approved? I thought that reverse thrust wasn't factored into landing distance calculations.
India Four Two is offline  
Old 20th Jul 2016, 17:18
  #69 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 1999
Location: England
Age: 76
Posts: 1,196
Likes: 0
Received 28 Likes on 16 Posts
SOP was full reverse coming over the fence, as was the case for other short fields it operated into.
IIRC (after 38 years) for short landings reverse idle was selected during the flare, then increased as required after touchdown.

He recounts a jump seat trip he made to Oslo during the last month of BA Trident operations (December 1985), where the boost engine was used not just on the return leg (where it was essential in the Norwegian winter) but also on takeoff at LHR to confirm its serviceability
I recall a winter departure from OSL when the boost was required for contaminated runway perf. The boost started OK but failed on spool up so we taxied back to the gate and offloaded enough pax (more than half of them IIRC) to reduce the RTOW to achieve no-boost perf.

Last edited by Discorde; 20th Jul 2016 at 17:28.
Discorde is offline  
Old 20th Jul 2016, 17:23
  #70 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Austria
Posts: 706
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
Full reverse over the fence...

Did that come with other operational requirements, like a slight increment to Va, increased power on #2 or a different flare technique? Or was the (presumably) firm arrival intended to happen?
Tu.114 is offline  
Old 20th Jul 2016, 19:36
  #71 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Reading, UK
Posts: 15,816
Received 201 Likes on 93 Posts
Originally Posted by India Four Two
How did that get approved? I thought that reverse thrust wasn't factored into landing distance calculations.
While it's true that you can't take credit for reverse in scheduling performance, use of the technique was clearly considered to be prudent.

Originally Posted by Discorde
IIRC (after 38 years) for short landings reverse idle was selected during the flare, then increased as required after touchdown.
You may well be right about that. It was, as you say, a long time ago.

Originally Posted by Tu.114
Did that come with other operational requirements, like a slight increment to Va, increased power on #2 or a different flare technique? Or was the (presumably) firm arrival intended to happen?
I don't know what effect, if any, it had on scheduled speeds, but I can vouch for the fact that every T3 landing I experienced on 13 or 31 at EDI was reassuringly firm, to say the least.
DaveReidUK is offline  
Old 21st Jul 2016, 09:03
  #72 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Reading, UK
Posts: 15,816
Received 201 Likes on 93 Posts
A bit more background on the Trident reverse-in-the-flare technique from an old PPRuNe thread:

The Trident NORMAL landing procedure as noted earlier in this thread, is to close the throttles and select reverse idle (pod engines obviously) IN THE FLARE. This was actioned by the P2 as non-handling pilot, the handling pilot P1 having both hands on the yoke. Optionally one could then select FULL reverse while in the flare, and this was a very effective technique on short or wet runways as the Trident had pretty mediocre brakes. So the crew brief for this technique, in the flare the call is “Power off and full reverse”. The P2 closes the thrust levers and immediately pulls up the reverser levers, the buckets deploy and the pod engines never spool down but increase RPM from the approach value to close to full power for a few moments, then back to idle as the aircraft slows.
http://www.pprune.org/tech-log/43449...stem-autoland-

Maybe my memory isn't so bad after all.
DaveReidUK is offline  
Old 21st Jul 2016, 11:13
  #73 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 1999
Location: England
Age: 76
Posts: 1,196
Likes: 0
Received 28 Likes on 16 Posts
Thanks DRUK! I stand corrected! During my year on the T3 I don't remember ever using the full rev during flare technique.
Discorde is offline  
Old 21st Jul 2016, 14:23
  #74 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Austria
Posts: 706
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
Thank You for the explanation, DaveReid. A most interesting topic. I find the philosophy of having P1 control only the flight controls and P2 handling the power levers remarkable. On the very few FADEC-less types I know, the PNF only set rated power as this involved longer heads-down time inappropriate for the PF (DH8-300 always, F70/100 only when both Autothrottle channels were u/s), but all the other time, the power levers were in the PFs domain.

Did P2 have his hands on the power levers during the entire approach, or was there a transfer of power lever control at some point?
Tu.114 is offline  
Old 21st Jul 2016, 15:32
  #75 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 1999
Location: England
Age: 76
Posts: 1,196
Likes: 0
Received 28 Likes on 16 Posts
Did P2 have his hands on the power levers during the entire approach, or was there a transfer of power lever control at some point?
As I recall SOP was auto-throttle for all approaches, with PM's hand on the thrust levers to monitor their movement. The other option (rarely used) was for PF to call for power changes (as LP RPM settings), the adjustments made by PM manually. A strange system, and I can't remember the rationale behind it.
Discorde is offline  
Old 21st Jul 2016, 18:29
  #76 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Austria
Posts: 706
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
Thank You, Discorde. This is a peculiar procedure indeed, calling for rather good understanding between the pilots. There must have been some reaction time between the P1s call for reverse and the response of P2, making the difference between a nice, smooth landing and ... well, something deserving to be called "arrival" rather than "landing".

At a risk of a thread drift, but thinking about it, I remember having heard of a similar SOP on the IL-62 with Interflug (although there not the P2, but the F/E pulled the reverse on the handling pilots request), occasionally raising the question of which one of the two was responsible for the impact that just occurred. Such "shared" operation of the flight controls seems to have been not uncommon a while ago.
Tu.114 is offline  
Old 21st Jul 2016, 20:06
  #77 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: N . Daarset
Age: 71
Posts: 314
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Hi guys , at the risk of 30 ½ years away from currency ; a few memories .
Boost was not disconnected on T3bs , they might have gone u/s and not been mended towards the end [ 31/Dec 85 ].
Last trip was 29/11/85 , used boost out of the old short Munich a/p [ was pulled off the fleet early for a 737 course ]. Might have been for fun ‘tho . Helped deliver empty G-AWZZ to Brum fire services Nov/84 . used boost for fun to try a V2 climb to 2400’ , then a 500’ fly by of Wycombe Airpark [ Booker ] .
Had it break on a snowy Glasgow [GLA] dep , with snow at LHR . We needed it to carry a full load and the needed extra fuel for a bad day out ! Had to sit at runway end powering up to burn off extra fuel . Took quite a while , and we only just made it to LHR on minimum reserves , before one runway shut for snow clearing , and the other got blocked by a new 757 careering around .
Old Edinburgh [EDI] runway 13 /31 certainly had T3s in and out , and very often landing with a limiting tailwind …over running into the cabbage field at the end . Aberdeen [ ABZ ]was the same , an ILS only to one end , and with the Haar in , it was needed …. But landing with a max tailwind … T1/2s normally ok , but T3s often in the field .
A version of normal ops was 10,000 LP rpm in the flare , if timed right it cushioned / kissed you on . If not , thump . ABZ , when skipper asked for reverse …he meant emergency reverse [ pull those levers ‘til they came off in your hand , but you had 12,000 LP rpm ] .
Throttle handling was a bit different . In auto flight , the handling pilot operated a/p and a/t .
In manual flight handling pilot flew the a/c and asked non- handling pilot for the power he required , [ in LP rpm ] ‘’ ten – eight [ 10800 ] , eleven [ 11,000 ] , twelve thousnd [12,000] , power off , Reverse idle , REVERSE ‘’ , etc .
It was not until Mr Wu [ T1E G-ASWU ex Cyprus Airways] came back from it sojourn in Nicosia [ ’74 war ] , that the 1 and 2 fleet had a 1E to play with . Complete with GT throttles ; which were cranked backwards 2/3 rds of the way up . Bliss…. handling pilot could now reach the throttles from a comfortable seating / flying position ; so non standardly several skippers allowed us to do our own power settings whilst flying manually …. Easy peasy . But impossible in the BEA ordered 1Cs , 2E s and 3Bs with straight up throttles out of reach ; which is why I guess we did not handle our own power when manually flying !

Rgds condor .

PS, ‘’reassuringly firm’’…… = ‘positive touchdown on a wet runway , to ensure wheel spin up , max braking , avoiding aquaplaning ‘ .

PPS, 17 static wicks on a 737-200 … if 1 missing then performance implications .

PPPS , extremely lucky to have 4 very happy years in Highland Division , lots of PDB ‘ pur dead brilliant ‘[ GLA accent ] guys and gurls in back , front , left or right seats .
condor17 is offline  
Old 22nd Jul 2016, 10:29
  #78 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: France
Age: 80
Posts: 6,379
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Should have changed the name from "Trident" to "Quadrant"...................hat, coat...........
Wander00 is offline  
Old 11th Aug 2016, 16:17
  #79 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Very close to the Theatre of Dreams!
Posts: 156
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Only flew on the T3 twice when for some reason BA where using them on bucket and spade routes for British Airtours. I flew to Alicantie and back (from Manchester).

I couldn't believe how quiet it was inside but so damn noisy outside (I was in row 3 both ways I think).

I also remember covering the last operation out of Manchester on 31 Dec 1985, cant remember the reg but it was a T3 and flew the mid morning shuttle into Man then did a pleasure flight before returning back as the evening shuttle. It was a cold overcast day and we where sitting at the end of 24 waiting for the overshoot at the end of the pleasure flight taking photos for a local rag.
Rob Courtney is offline  
Old 11th Aug 2016, 19:09
  #80 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: North East UK
Posts: 204
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It was "Zulu Oscar" operating BA4513 from Manchester which was the last Trident Three landing at Heathrow carrying passengers being a fraction of a second behind a LHR-AMS-LHR charter operated by "Zulu Victor". "Zulu Victor" had operated BA's last scheduled international Trident Three service to/from Copenhagen earlier that day. I was fortunate and had flown to Copenhagen and back then on that last Shuttle flight. Happy Days.
GAXLN is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.