PPRuNe Forums

Go Back   PPRuNe Forums > Misc. Forums > Aviation History and Nostalgia
Forgotten your Username/Password?


Aviation History and Nostalgia Whether working in aviation, retired, wannabee or just plain fascinated this forum welcomes all with a love of flight.


Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 13th Mar 2012, 00:49   #1 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: .
Posts: 1,998
fastest subsonic transatlantic crossing?

Anyone know what the fastest subsonic crossing of the Atlantic is?

In the late 1980's I was on a BA 747 Boston > Heathrow which took off in the teeth of a gale and did a rollercoaster ride all the way. On landing the pilot announced we had completed the "second fastest subsonic Atlantic crossing".
The background was that the aircraft had arrived two hours late from Philadelphia. We boarded immediately but were then held for another two hours while the aircraft was deiced and the runway ploughed clear of snow (a massive storm was approaching)
We left nearly four hours late and arrived virtually on time after sitting in a 300+ mph jet stream all the way
So anyone know what would have beaten that? A VC-10?
Milo Minderbinder is online now   Reply
Old 13th Mar 2012, 01:52   #2 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Why oh why would I wanna be anywhere else?
Posts: 1,016
Quote:
The performance of the VC10 was such that it achieved the fastest crossing of the Atlantic - London to New York, by a jet airliner, a record still held in 2009 for a sub-sonic airliner although beaten by the supersonic Concorde.
Vickers
sisemen is online now   Reply
Old 13th Mar 2012, 08:08   #3 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: down south
Age: 66
Posts: 12,841
An ex-Lightning mate of mine transferred to the VC10 in 1973. He said that, if necessary (VIP trips) it would cruise at M0.94.

Not many jets of that era or this could achieve that.

His great comment was that he transferred from one fast jet to another.....

However, he also said that the fuel consumption of the Conways was horrendous.

Perhaps there are some ex-VC10 guys out there who can add more.
Lightning Mate is offline   Reply
Old 13th Mar 2012, 08:25   #4 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Surrey, UK ;
Age: 60
Posts: 754
My recollection was that the Convair 990 Coronado was quicker than a 707 or a DC-8 .... is that a contender ?

Although Wikipedia cites the VC-10 but without referencing a particular flight, date, time or speed.
Dave Gittins is offline   Reply
Old 13th Mar 2012, 08:30   #5 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Aug 1998
Location: London, UK
Posts: 1,509
Quote:
However, he also said that the fuel consumption of the Conways was horrendous.
An ex-Lightning pilot said that? Bl**dy cheek!
Groundloop is offline   Reply
Old 13th Mar 2012, 08:34   #6 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: down south
Age: 66
Posts: 12,841
No comment Your Honour.
Lightning Mate is offline   Reply
Old 13th Mar 2012, 08:44   #7 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: .
Posts: 1,998
That statement about the VC10 is ambiguous anyway - it could be taken to refer to specifically London to New York, which is westbound. An eastbound flight should be quicker
Milo Minderbinder is online now   Reply
Old 13th Mar 2012, 10:27   #8 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Somerset UK
Age: 59
Posts: 508
A former crewmate of mine told a story about taking Margaret Thatcher in a VC10 to Washington to meet the US and French Presidents.

They were late leaving Heathrow due to road traffic and a man came to the front asking if it would be possible to arrive before the French Presidents aircraft.

The crossing was made at about M .91 and mission accomplished. (not much fuel remaining)

He also told me that there were significant position errors on the VC10 at high speed so that when indicating M .91 you were actually doing M .88.
dixi188 is offline   Reply
Old 13th Mar 2012, 10:57   #9 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: The Rooftops....
Posts: 654
Does the quickest subsonic refer to (sort of) still air conditions rather than surfing along a jetstream ? If the latter, may I forward a 5hr 15m MIA-CDG sector on a DC-10.



SHJ
SpringHeeledJack is online now   Reply
Old 13th Mar 2012, 12:41   #10 (permalink)
 
Join Date: May 1999
Location: Quite near 'An aerodrome somewhere in England'
Posts: 20,176
Quote:
An ex-Lightning mate of mine transferred to the VC10 in 1973. He said that, if necessary (VIP trips) it would cruise at M0.94.

Not many jets of that era or this could achieve that.
The VC10 being one of them. M0.94 is, I'm sorry to say, WIWOL exaggeration (as in 'AI 23 picked up targets at over 10 miles')....

Cruising at an indicated M0.91 was outside the release to service limits, but very probably just about possible in a very highly polished VIP jet - fuel consumption would have been horrendous though. I've certainly cruised the Pond at M0.88 indicated, but the only time I took the RAF VC10 over M0.9 was during properly authorised post-maintenance air tests.

I suspect that the Convair 990 'Coronado' was quicker than the VC10, but probably didn't have the fuel to cruise at high IMN for very far.
BEagle is online now   Reply
Old 13th Mar 2012, 12:55   #11 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: London UK
Posts: 4,532
Fastest subsonic currently has to be on Air Canada St Johns Newfoundland to Heathrow A319, which is 2,012 nm Great Circle, compared to the example Boston to Heathrow flight which is 2,837 nm. Boston to Shannon on Aer Lingus is 2,516 nm. In the days when Air Canada did Gander-Prestwick on a Tristar that was only 1,844 nm and probably was the minimum you could achieve, I believe they were often well under 4 hours. The timetable time in a 1962 timetable I have here for a DC8 on this route is 4 hours 5 minutes.

However the OP's example might have been a near-record for this particular combination of carrier and route. Or for the skipper's log book.

Regarding the Convair 990 Coronado it was never used on Transatlantic schedules.
WHBM is offline   Reply
Old 13th Mar 2012, 12:57   #12 (permalink)

 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 10,333
I was on the fringe of a high altitude VC10 to Tornado AAR and airborne intercept trial in the mid 1990s.

My recollection is that the VC10 could out-turn, out climb, and out accelerate the untrustworthy tornadoesntgo.

Then the Tornado's radar fell over, and it got vectored onto its target using the VC10's weather radar!

Fun times.

G
Genghis the Engineer is offline   Reply
Old 14th Mar 2012, 14:48   #13 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: east ESSEX
Posts: 2,043
Done Gander to Lyneham in 4hrs 50 mins in Albert....415kts g/s....
sycamore is offline   Reply
Old 14th Mar 2012, 16:33   #14 (permalink)

A Runyonesque Character
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: The Big E
Age: 63
Posts: 1,086
I suppose that beats the Tornado too?
The SSK is offline   Reply
Old 14th Mar 2012, 19:09   #15 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: wales
Posts: 251
Does anyone have info on the Buccaneer that did the first unrefuelled crossing in mid sixties think it was XN974 one of the early S2's.
bvcu is offline   Reply
Old 15th Mar 2012, 12:33   #16 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: near an airplane
Posts: 634
A 1968 BOAC timetable shows a Super VC10 trip from New York to London: departure 02:00 GMT, arrival 08:40 GMT. For the opposite direction the scheduled trip time is one hour longer.

In comparison a B707 (taken from a 1966 timetable) is planned for a 9:00 departure from New York (EST, so this would be 14:00 GMT) and scheduled to arrive in London at 20:30 GMT, 10 minutes less than in the VC10 planning.
Jhieminga is offline   Reply
Old 15th Mar 2012, 12:43   #17 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 489
747-100 G-AWNL 5hr 29 mins JFK to LHR 6 Jun 1994. Thats the fastest I can see in my logbook! Sometime after that they stopped us arriving early at LHR due to shortage of parking slots!!
newt is offline   Reply
Old 15th Mar 2012, 13:11   #18 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: down south
Age: 66
Posts: 12,841
Owza fishin' ?
Lightning Mate is offline   Reply
Old 15th Mar 2012, 13:37   #19 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 489
Brilliant!! Just joined a new syndicate so loads more fishing this year!!
newt is offline   Reply
Old 15th Mar 2012, 15:03   #20 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Wales, UK
Age: 54
Posts: 6,063
All down to the jetstream being in the right place but I recall a Laker DC10-10 in the late '70's with an actual flying time Bangor to Gatwick at 4 hrs 25 min. The computer flight plan showed 4 hr 20 min....I recall querying it at the time and requested our supplier to resend it - still came back with the same answer! On another date a DC10-30 achieved LAX-LGW in approx 8 hrs 45 mins.
skytrain10 is offline   Reply
 
 
This ad will disappear if you login
Reply
 


Thread Tools


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT. The time now is 09:48.


vBulletin® v3.8.7, Copyright ©2000-2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
SEO by vBSEO 3.6.1
© 1996-2012 The Professional Pilots Rumour Network

As these are anonymous forums the origins of the contributions may be opposite to what may be apparent. In fact the press may use it, or the unscrupulous, or sciolists*, to elicit certain reactions.

*"sciolist"... Noun, archaic. "a person who pretends to be knowledgeable and well informed".