PPRuNe Forums

Go Back   PPRuNe Forums > Misc. Forums > Aviation History and Nostalgia
Forgotten your Username/Password?
Register FAQ Calendar Advertise Mark Forums Read

Aviation History and Nostalgia Whether working in aviation, retired, wannabee or just plain fascinated this forum welcomes all with a love of flight.


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 8th July 2009, 12:39   #2621 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: UK
Age: 68
Posts: 1,715
Now I heard a story several months ago that the plans to scrap XM603 at Woodford had been put on the backburner since it still has a lot of fuel in it and it's not going to be easy to get it out.

I was told that one organisation had told BAe that they would happily do the job - for £150,000.

If true, that would make your eyes water!
JW411 is offline   Reply
Old 8th July 2009, 19:21   #2622 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Burton
Posts: 35
Your right about BAE wanting the fuel removed from XM603 prior 2 anything being done with it, in fact fuel being kept in the tanks back when it was kept in ground running condition is the reason that work was stopped on the aircraft at that time.

Someone in health and safety went mad that the aircraft was being kept with fuel in the tanks decided this was unsafe and that was the end of the aircraft being kept in running condition, to make matters worse someone else then made the decision the ladders the team working on XM603 had used were unsafe and all work to stop on the aircraft

As for XH558 well what can you say, its a total farce you would have thought that at Waddington they would have taxied the aircraft at the very least, many people have asked why this did not happen but as per usual no explanation is forthcoming and a quick look at the website tonight shows no update on the permit to fly issue, for crying out loud do TVOC actually understand the meaning of communication they are taking the publics money therefore have a responsibility to keep the public informed of whats being done with that money, still one thing TVOC are good at is not replying to e-mails I have tried 3 times to inform them the webpage that allows you to enter the monthly lottery type thing to raise funds does not work and guess what no reply and no working webpage, I know someone who owns 3 shops he wrote to TVOC to try and find out about having collection tins for the project in his stores and never even got a response, I've given a fair amount over the years and done my own small bit to try and get others to donate but not anymore I'm fed up with it all.
andrewman is offline   Reply
Old 8th July 2009, 19:31   #2623 (permalink)
Cool Mod
 
Join Date: Apr 1998
Location: 18nm N of LGW
Posts: 4,447
eddief,

Your little rant is your own, it is not shared by as many as you would like to think.

No-one to my knowledge has ever questioned the ability and dedication of those who have worked so hard on the project. That, has NEVER been in question.

However, please do not try to defend the indefensible. Unless you have been living on another planet the root cause here at this moment in time is that a major blunder occurred that rocked the project once more. And it is all too simple really. Someone did not do their job! The paperwork as I have said is the 'soul' of the aeroplane. Without it, it will not fly. Wild ideas have been espoused about how 'deals' have been done etc., This is all about peeing in the wind.

At one time I operated 27 aircraft, all with commercial a CofA, all with AOC's and all with quality engineering back-up. This aircraft is AOG! No proper paperwork, no-one seemingly chasing those responsible and everyone guessing when the CAA will 'perform.' They won't, not until all the i's and t's are dotted and crossed.

So please don't high horse your theories and cover ups. Accept that there is a major mistake. The managers of the project are TVOC the engineers are Marshall's

We defend the posters here just as we rebuke them if they step over the line but right now that has not been necessary.

The management need to get out from whatever they are under.
__________________
Cool Mod - Here, and was there.
[email address]
PPRuNe Pop is offline   Reply
Old 8th July 2009, 11:25   #2624 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Scotland
Posts: 35
eddief

er gov, me MOT has run out but i know the motor is ok, can i drive it for a few months until i get around to getting the bit of paper?
side salad is offline   Reply
Old 8th July 2009, 12:04   #2625 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Cambridge
Posts: 9
Eddief

Eddief

First of all, many thanks for your critically timed financial support in helping the Vulcan do what we all want to see her do-FLY.

However, I am one of the 10000+ who helped keep her in the air this year, and I will not continue to donate to this project with the current management team in charge.

The longer DrP and his team preside over the sort of disaster which happened last weekend, the more the credibility of the project suffers. I ask you, how are you going to attract the new sponsorship and donations required to keep the aircraft in the air year on year when something as critical for the business a PtF renewal is as badly botched as this was?

What this project requires now is new leadership, with someone who has the degree of credibility required to restore public confidence and bring in the cash needed to keep 558 in the air.

Anybody got DT's phone number?
Treble one is offline   Reply
Old 8th July 2009, 12:04   #2626 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: UK
Age: 68
Posts: 1,715
So could it be that the owners of XH558 asked BAe Systems some time ago if they could have some bits from XM603 for Destructive Testing when it got scrapped. BAe did not have a problem with that for all they wanted to do was to get rid of a dead Vulcan covered in green gunge parked outside their Woodford empire and the bits would have been going to the scrapyard anyway.

Then BAe discovered that it was going to cost serious money to scrap XM603 so they were suddenly not in a hurry and the bits required for testing are now not going to be available for some time (unless someone meets the bill).

I last drove past XM603 on 23 June and it was still in one piece albeit looking quite sad.

Someone should have seen this coming.
JW411 is offline   Reply
Old 8th July 2009, 12:39   #2627 (permalink)
 
Join Date: May 1999
Location: Quite near 'An aerodrome somewhere in England'
Posts: 15,742
Eddief, many thanks for all your exceptional support for '558. Without your invaluable and amazing generosity, the aircraft would never have flown this year - and probably would never do so again.

Thank you also for the communiques you've posted on the VTTS website - everyone must surely appreciate the clarity and transparency of those communications. I hope that VTST will hoist on board the lessons of last weekend as they have lost an enormous amount of goodwill from many supporters.

But they'll still get my monthly direct debit, nonetheless.

I hope that 558 will be at Yeovilton this weekend - and thanks once again for your exceptional support!!
BEagle is online now   Reply
Old 8th July 2009, 13:15   #2628 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: The sunny south
Posts: 155
Quote:
Originally Posted by BEagle
Eddief, many thanks for all your exceptional support for '558. Without your invaluable and amazing generosity, the aircraft would never have flown this year - and probably would never do so again.

Thank you also for the communiques you've posted on the VTTS website - everyone must surely appreciate the clarity and transparency of those communications. I hope that VTST will hoist on board the lessons of last weekend as they have lost an enormous amount of goodwill from many supporters.

But they'll still get my monthly direct debit, nonetheless.

I hope that 558 will be at Yeovilton this weekend - and thanks once again for your exceptional support!
Well said Sir, I wholeheartedly agree.
hurn is offline   Reply
Old 8th July 2009, 15:59   #2629 (permalink)
Probationary PPRuNer
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: lincoln
Posts: 1
Angry

I still quite can't believe the show weekend has passed with no vulcan. Thursday was so full of promise. The pain the base personnel and the Airshow office must have had to endure? I know people on the station who have been abused by the public for the no-show.
The VTTS have damaged the reputation of the Stn, the Air show office and the RAF. There is a pile of embarrasing metal taking up operational space and personally I can't wait to see it leave and not come back.

I did hear VTTS even had the front to ask the RAF for hangarage!

nice try VTTS. You could really have made it for us enthusiasts of the plane, but instead you screwed it up for everyone.

Branson. Please buy the plane for a £1 and put in in trust, but have your engineering team run the programme. Stick as many Virgin signs on it as you want but for god's sake fly it professionally for us.

We will never forgive VTTS for this.

Why?

They never admitted to the late screw up and kept quiet and flew in pretending all was well.
They tried to blame everyone else but themselves.
They failed to inform Waddo, and now leave them babysitting the thing.
They never once apologised.
They still haven't apologised.
Oh yes, they STILL haven't apologised.
Oh. look at their latest website post. They STILL haven't apologised.
GO90 is offline   Reply
Old 8th July 2009, 17:22   #2630 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: West Yorkshire Zone
Posts: 985
Just watched the video of the 2008 show.

A perfect weekend of displays, As it should be when most of us J public pay 21.00 to go into Waddo!!!

Makes the 2009 show a 'Shambles' thru and thru!!!

The 2009 show 'Should' have displayed at the 'Minimum':
1 Vc10
1 Herc
1 Merlin
1 Seaking
1 Harrier or Tornado

And other possible displays available dependant on theatre op's.

As a previous poster said - 'They didn't even make an effort to even ground run or taxi XH558!!!

That would have at least shown the Paying J public that they were 'Genuinly' sorry about the whole state of affairs??

(I don't know what the surviving 'Old Boys' thought of it all)

I know what I think F**k!!!

The 2009 show is a show we 'The J Public' will never forget!!!

Enough said My rant over.

Try again in 2010.
BYALPHAINDIA is offline   Reply
Old 8th July 2009, 18:15   #2631 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Oxenfforrdde
Posts: 131
Quite right BYALPHA

A ground run would've at least done some pr good.

I'll still give my money, but this just looks like the same old story. Bad/amateur management. Would not be allowed in my org.

I noticed the crowd reaction to the announcement at Biggin on the Sunday, I'm sure many would've been mollified by some of that awesome noise.

Glad I'm doing 2 days of RIAT..... ( & bothered to go to BZZ the other day )
Tyres O'Flaherty is offline   Reply
Old 9th July 2009, 03:12   #2632 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Wales
Age: 35
Posts: 21
Quote:
A ground run would've at least done some pr good.
Unless a similar incident to the one which happened to the Victor occurred, and then they would be even deeper in the ****

I'm considering myself very lucky to have been at Cosford last month...at least I'm one of the few to have seen it so far this year!!
mark25787 is offline   Reply
Old 9th July 2009, 04:18   #2633 (permalink)
kwh
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Carmarthen
Posts: 25
So just to clarify, the current position of TVOC, reading between the lines of the press release (because they aren't being explicit) is that they knew nothing and didn't understand any of the issues surrounding the Permits, and that the deferred in all these matters to Marshalls who understand them, and were thus shocked when it all went wrong.

Taking this strictly at face value, TVOC are publicly admitting that they don't know what they are doing, are they not? And that they are vulnerable to either being taken for a ride by, or (as allegedly in this case) let down by a supplier because they don't know what they are doing...

If TVOC are publically announcing that operating the Vulcan on the civil register is all too complicated for the TVOC operational people to understand and beyond their competence and experience to cope with, then why are individuals still holding down jobs that they are unable to fulfill the requirements of?

I thought the original idea was that TVOC was going to be a little one-plane selc-contained 'airline', doing its own operations and maintenance in its little shed at Brunty. Presumably on the evidence of TVOC's competence from this last weekend we can all be thankful that the maintenance is still in the hands of Marshalls...
kwh is offline   Reply
Old 9th July 2009, 06:15   #2634 (permalink)
Cunning Artificer
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: The spiritual home of DeHavilland
Age: 62
Posts: 2,396
Quote:
Some got seriously scarred by last weekend's screw-up but most of them now appreciate that 'black & white' rarely applies to complex project-management & decades old aircraft
I'm sorry to disagree Eddie, but the operation of all civil aircraft is perfectly black and white, (although the RAF has been known to occasionally use a bit of red ink ).

The operator has responsibility to directly oversee every aspect of the operation, including any delegated or sub-contracted activities such as maintenance or continuing airworthiness management.

Always.
Blacksheep is online now   Reply
Old 9th July 2009, 07:54   #2635 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Halifax, West Yorks
Age: 69
Posts: 41
As a long term air show attendee, I would like to add my two cents worth to the debate.
Because of a serious illlness, I am no longer able to attend airshows as I can no longer enjoy strolling round the ground displays. I have enjoyed airshows from the fifties - starting with Turnhouse in 1954, then Farnborough in 1957 and so on through the years. For many years, I was an active member of the Canadian Warplane Heritage and visited airshows annually in Hamilton, Ontario; London, Ontario and at Toronto waterfront.
In short, I know airshows!!
This year my wife treated me top a birthday surprise. We were to do Waddington first class!!
We flew in by helicopter from Newark Air Musuem and were wined and dined at the Lord Trenchard pavilion, where the hospitality was superb, and then flew back to Newark. How superior I felt looking down on the traffic jams that I am usually tied up in!!
So far so good. Now for the actual airshow.
It was probably the WORST air show I have ever attended.
Apart from the Vulcan fiasco, the display was very poor. There was very little modern air force equipment from either the Royal Air Force, or the NATO countries. Surely they are not all in Afghanistan or Iraq? No F15s, F16s or F18s. There were too many aerobatic teams - some of dubious quality, and as a previous writer has remarked, the aircraft were very high and far away.
The grouind display was poorly laid out with the aircraft on display scattered haphazardly between the hangars, stands and funfairs
Oh, for the good old days when there was a lineup of static aircraft and a separate display of display aircraft.
The sound system was appalling - a non stop barrage of very loud music.
At least the sound was closed down for the last Lancaster/Spitfire/Hurricane
flypast (according the commentator, at the request of persons who were recording on camcorders) I want to HEAR Merlins not rock music, otherwise I would have gone to Glastonbury.
The promise of TWO Vulcans and a Concorde will not drag me back to Waddington

Last edited by Gordon Fraser : 9th July 2009 at 11:40.
Gordon Fraser is offline   Reply
Old 9th July 2009, 07:57   #2636 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Dunno, the sat nav is busted.
Age: 34
Posts: 89
Quote:
I still quite can't believe the show weekend has passed with no vulcan. Thursday was so full of promise. The pain the base personnel and the Airshow office must have had to endure? I know people on the station who have been abused by the public for the no-show.
The VTTS have damaged the reputation of the Stn, the Air show office and the RAF. There is a pile of embarrasing metal taking up operational space and personally I can't wait to see it leave and not come back.

I did hear VTTS even had the front to ask the RAF for hangarage!

nice try VTTS. You could really have made it for us enthusiasts of the plane, but instead you screwed it up for everyone.

Branson. Please buy the plane for a £1 and put in in trust, but have your engineering team run the programme. Stick as many Virgin signs on it as you want but for god's sake fly it professionally for us.

We will never forgive VTTS for this.

Why?

They never admitted to the late screw up and kept quiet and flew in pretending all was well.
They tried to blame everyone else but themselves.
They failed to inform Waddo, and now leave them babysitting the thing.
They never once apologised.
They still haven't apologised.
Oh yes, they STILL haven't apologised.
Oh. look at their latest website post. They STILL haven't apologised.

I don't think the reputation of the station has been damaged has it? surely people are intelligent enough to know it's not don to Waddington.

The reasons for the late anouncment were given, not saying i agree but they were to be fair stuck between a rock and a hard place.

As fro branson buying the plane, well thats realy rather funny! he would have to shell out considerably more than a quid and it is in trust already
and besides i don't think Branson is into woodwork is he?
bubblesuk is offline   Reply
Old 9th July 2009, 09:20   #2637 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Lincolnshire
Posts: 28
Quote:
I don't think the reputation of the station has been damaged has it? surely people are intelligent enough to know it's not don to Waddington
Local publicity here was heavily based on the Vulcan - and the station didn't deliver. So no matter whose fault it is, the show's reputation will be affected. If I were running the show for next year I'd want to do a bit of due diligence on 558's maintenance and paperwork before accepting it again, bearing in mind the standard of competence shown by the Vulcan's operators to date.
kiwibrit is offline   Reply
Old 9th July 2009, 09:54   #2638 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Dunno, the sat nav is busted.
Age: 34
Posts: 89
Fair point, though i think the quality of the display this year will hurt them more.
bubblesuk is offline   Reply
Old 9th July 2009, 10:44   #2639 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: lincoln
Posts: 8
Afraid i've got to agree.
Whether you like it or not Lincolnshire is the home to the Vulcan and the same with the Lancaster and the media,organisers play on this fact.
Waddo Airshow has been pretty dire for a few years now but it won't stop people from attending as most of them are not aviation enthusiasts but just looking for a good day out and trust me round here they're few and far between.The Vulcan is still news at the moment and just makes the show that much more interesting and even non aviation people can relate to it.For how much longer if any more issues like last weekend occur is anyones guess.
mark36 is offline   Reply
Old 9th July 2009, 11:44   #2640 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Lincolnshire
Posts: 5
Some activity around 558 this afternoon - car, transit van and an apu; was hopefully might see her depart (in a good way - nice to see her fly etc. not get rid of her!) but alas to no avail. After all that has been said, do hope she flies at Yeovilton,when all said and done, we all want the same thing - to see this beautiful bird grace the skies!
kweelo is offline   Reply
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes


Posting Rules
vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 14:16.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC7
© 1996-2009 The Professional Pilots Rumour Network

As these are anonymous forums the origins of the contributions may be opposite to what may be apparent. In fact the press may use it, or the unscrupulous, or sciolists*, to elicit certain reactions.

*"sciolist"... Noun, archaic. "a person who pretends to be knowledgeable and well informed".