Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific Airline and RPT Rumours & News in Australia, enZed and the Pacific

Air Asia Again.

Old 4th Nov 2017, 04:44
  #41 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: Europe
Posts: 1,674
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Caveat emptor

Adversarial industrial posture at airlines is replicated in most industries.

The problem with this approach is that the idea is it assumes that you can pursue ever lowering of remuneration or 'labour unit cost' without compromising product; poor service in a restaurant. So to the practitioner a pilot or flight attendant is another labour unit to be minimised. They have by design no connection with the operation, little understanding or how revenue is actually generated nor do they care.

The modern derivations of airlines are the manifestation (Ryanair, AirAsia and Jetstar are industrially motivated business models) of the insistence that labour unit cost be minimised without repercussion. The reality when something goes wrong shows to all present that sometimes quality costs....

The HR/IR people are never present, always fly premier airlines and have their weekends off
Rated De is offline  
Old 4th Nov 2017, 14:01
  #42 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Australia
Posts: 4,188
Likes: 0
Received 14 Likes on 5 Posts
The casual passenger has no idea, especially if there isn't any warning. So, if one is sitting in 65k in relative serenity when all hell apparently breaks loose with masks appearing and the aircraft dropping like a proverbial brick with attendant noise and shudder, why in hell wouldn't he or she be terrified?
On the other hand you can be like the little old lady on her first flight Nauru to Apia, Samoa. A four hour flight normally. 30 years ago. 737-200. Dark night departure.

20 minutes out of Nauru 31,000 ft uncommanded de-pressurisation with cabin rising. Emergency descent started (rightly or wrongly as it turned out). Oxy masks didn't drop because cabin never got above 14,000 ft. Cabin was under control passing 25,000 ft and aircraft levelled out and decision made to go back to Nauru. Appropriate PA made to passengers and cabin attendants. All OK down the back except for a few sore ears.

Landed Nauru and passengers disembarked while techs fixed the pressurisation.
As the little old lady was helped down the stairs, she said quite serenely to the cabin attendant "That was a quick flight - Are we at Apia already?"
Centaurus is offline  
Old 4th Nov 2017, 23:50
  #43 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Sydney Australia
Age: 74
Posts: 118
Received 7 Likes on 1 Post
Approaching Norfolk in a DC4, shut down #3 engine. LOL calls cabin crew and asks if we are getting close to Norfolk. Cabin crew reassuringly says yes. LOL smugly replies - I thought so they are starting to stop the engines.
A different generation of Pax (and crew).
PW1830 is offline  
Old 22nd Nov 2017, 00:59
  #44 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Perth, WESTERN AUSTRALIA
Age: 71
Posts: 888
Received 17 Likes on 11 Posts
From Geoffery Thomas - West Australian newspaper

Report into Air Asia flight QF535 found pressurization system to blame

AirAsia flight QF535 was on its way to Bali from Perth and had started climbing from 24,000ft to its initial cruise altitude of 34,000ft when problems emerged.
Luckily, Geoff and AJ seem to be on good speaking terms....

Should be able to find newly released Interim Report on ATSB site or;

https://www.atsb.gov.au/publications...r/ao-2017-098/
WingNut60 is offline  
Old 30th Nov 2017, 05:28
  #45 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: bkk
Posts: 285
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Early this morning on joining the ILS at Kuala Lumpurs second airport was asked by ATC "is the Localiser okay?".Replied yes its seems normal but a little later I noticed it was in fact offset from the runway center line......On landing the reason for this became apparent.During type rating circuit training the A320 had departed the end of the runway and crashed in to the LOC equipment!!No injuries apparently but the 320 was badly damaged.The usual airline spin stated there was an "incident"..........AGAIN.
piratepete is offline  
Old 30th Nov 2017, 07:31
  #46 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Brisvegas
Posts: 3,873
Likes: 0
Received 243 Likes on 104 Posts
What, the tower staff did not notice an A320 run off the end?

http://www.thesundaily.my/news/2017/...aining-session
Icarus2001 is online now  
Old 30th Nov 2017, 09:12
  #47 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Oz
Age: 68
Posts: 1,913
Received 295 Likes on 124 Posts
That accident (not incident) pretty much sums up their check and training standards.

I’ve noted the ATSB has extended a few open incidents with this mob since the last few have occurred. Let’s hope they are having a closer look and digging deeper.
PoppaJo is offline  
Old 1st Dec 2017, 02:38
  #48 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: M.I.A.
Posts: 209
Received 17 Likes on 6 Posts
And again.

ATSB report.
Bug Smasher Smasher is offline  
Old 1st Dec 2017, 04:13
  #49 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Between a Rock and a Hard Place
Posts: 144
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I would say people are only going to pay attention when this mob is involved in a fatal incident. But that’s already occurred.....
Jeps is offline  
Old 1st Dec 2017, 05:10
  #50 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Florida USA
Age: 61
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
What is your CASA going to say when they spear an A330 into the houses in an Australia major city, all onboard and many on the ground dead with a smoldering wreck and a bunch of houses to clear up. Imagine the TV footage ???

"In the interest of Safety "

" Safe Skies for All except AS pax "

What BS all talk no action tick tock tick tock.
4 Holer is offline  
Old 4th Dec 2017, 01:15
  #51 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Asia
Posts: 1,030
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Why did the ATSB mark this early turn as an accident not incident?

This mob skating on wafer thin ice now.
wheels_down is offline  
Old 4th Dec 2017, 01:32
  #52 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Seat 1A
Posts: 8,546
Received 73 Likes on 42 Posts
Why did the ATSB mark this early turn as an accident not incident?
It is an incident.
Capn Bloggs is offline  
Old 4th Dec 2017, 01:44
  #53 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Asia
Posts: 1,030
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Looks like a keying error as it was marked as accident when it was released, now incident!

Either way they are an accident waiting to happen.
wheels_down is offline  
Old 4th Dec 2017, 05:04
  #54 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: All over the Planet
Posts: 868
Received 12 Likes on 5 Posts
Angry

What does a carrier have to do to be banned from Australia's airspace? I recall that Garuda were once banned in Europe but allowed to operate to/from Australia. At what point do the Australian regulators step in to protect Australian consumers?
Ken Borough is offline  
Old 4th Dec 2017, 05:08
  #55 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 1999
Location: Lost in Space
Posts: 275
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by Ken Borough
What does a carrier have to do to be banned from Australia's airspace? I recall that Garuda were once banned in Europe but allowed to operate to/from Australia. At what point do the Australian regulators step in to protect Australian consumers?
It would appear that geopolitical interests outweigh safety oversight.
t_cas is offline  
Old 4th Dec 2017, 06:32
  #56 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Somewhere
Posts: 3,070
Received 138 Likes on 63 Posts
CASA are to busy smashing VH operators to worry about actually protecting the travelling public. Besides even if a foreign carrier ploughs one in, CASA are not responsible.

To honest if they were to shut down a non VH registered operator the racism card would be pulled out pretty quickly and CASA then hauled before some makeshift senate inquiry to explain their actions.
neville_nobody is offline  
Old 4th Dec 2017, 06:33
  #57 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Oz
Age: 68
Posts: 1,913
Received 295 Likes on 124 Posts
DPS Last Week.

PoppaJo is offline  
Old 4th Dec 2017, 20:07
  #58 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Between a Rock and a Hard Place
Posts: 144
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
We all want the best deals on things, airfares being no exception. But at what point do you say enough is enough? The flying public appears to care deeply about safety up until the point they have to pay for it.
Jeps is offline  
Old 5th Dec 2017, 02:21
  #59 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Brisvegas
Posts: 3,873
Likes: 0
Received 243 Likes on 104 Posts
I don't believe being a so called LCC is a primary reason here.
Icarus2001 is online now  
Old 5th Dec 2017, 07:40
  #60 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 354
Received 111 Likes on 45 Posts
I don't believe being a so called LCC is a primary reason here.
Assuming that's a secondary reason; then what is a primary reason for this particular carrier featuring so prominently in events in the region?
C441 is offline  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.