Wikiposts
Search
Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific Airline and RPT Rumours & News in Australia, enZed and the Pacific

First QF B787

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 21st Jun 2017, 02:14
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: International
Age: 76
Posts: 1,394
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
First QF B787

First QF B787 to be named Dreamtime
B772 is offline  
Old 21st Jun 2017, 02:46
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: The World
Posts: 2,298
Received 356 Likes on 195 Posts
https://tenplay.com.au/news/national...ew-dreamliners

The eight names chosen out of more than 60, 000 suggestions are: Great Barrier Reef, Boomerang, Skippy, Waltzing Matilda, Uluru, Great Southern Land, Quokka and Dreamtime.
dr dre is offline  
Old 21st Jun 2017, 02:48
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Earth
Posts: 332
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 2 Posts
Great name but I still don't understand why QF are making such a big deal over the 787. It has been operating for 6 years now, maybe longer? Hundreds flying around the world but somehow QF is trying to market this plane as a game changer even though they have been slowly cutting great routes over the years
TurningFinalRWY36 is offline  
Old 21st Jun 2017, 02:57
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Harbour Master Place
Posts: 662
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by TurningFinalRWY36
Great name but I still don't understand why QF are making such a big deal over the 787. It has been operating for 6 years now, maybe longer? Hundreds flying around the world but somehow QF is trying to market this plane as a game changer even though they have been slowly cutting great routes over the years
Wow, your just not a team player with your facts are you? (/sarc)


Correct, delivery of MSN number 6xx, way behind the curve. The greatest screw-up over the last 10 years has been the Asian experiment, and the A380 before that from which the balance sheet is only just beginning to heal. The B787 is a balance sheet game changer for QF. Everyone else moved on years ago...
CurtainTwitcher is offline  
Old 21st Jun 2017, 03:21
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Oz
Posts: 306
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Cheap advertising.

Isn't there already an aircraft named Uluru?
clark y is offline  
Old 21st Jun 2017, 05:03
  #6 (permalink)  

Evertonian
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: #3117# Ppruner of the Year Nominee 2005
Posts: 12,486
Received 101 Likes on 58 Posts
Tell 'em they're Dreamin'!
Buster Hyman is offline  
Old 21st Jun 2017, 05:53
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: WLG (FORMERLY PER)
Posts: 1,195
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
It is a game changer! So revolutionary it can't operate from T1 at Perth where all the other 787 operators fly from
topend3 is offline  
Old 21st Jun 2017, 06:33
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: sincity
Posts: 1,195
Received 33 Likes on 17 Posts
Originally Posted by TurningFinalRWY36
Great name but I still don't understand why QF are making such a big deal over the 787. It has been operating for 6 years now, maybe longer? Hundreds flying around the world but somehow QF is trying to market this plane as a game changer even though they have been slowly cutting great routes over the years
So what? Milk it, PR, PR and PR

Just gettin it out there
maggot is offline  
Old 21st Jun 2017, 06:42
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: Sunny Coast
Posts: 397
Received 14 Likes on 12 Posts
Big fuss over 8 frames
JQ has 11
Enough said
Deano969 is offline  
Old 21st Jun 2017, 06:45
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: In the Trees
Posts: 186
Likes: 0
Received 14 Likes on 3 Posts
The fanfare is a little bit embarrassing, I think the company Kool Aid bill must be astronomical! The fact that internationals low cost cousin has been operating the type for over 3 years and is even training all the intitial check captains seems to be lost in all the hooplah.

It's going to be interesting seeing a lone Qantas 787 at the Melbourne launch surrounded at the gate by Jetstar 787's...And ANZ , Brunei, United, Chinese Airlines, Air India....the list goes on.

I get the feeling some of us at the Q are suffering a little bit of Stockholm Syndrome!
ANCDU is offline  
Old 21st Jun 2017, 06:51
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Australia
Posts: 316
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Oh well, if it makes you feel better the Virgin group are eons away from getting one.
Falling Leaf is offline  
Old 21st Jun 2017, 07:28
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 145
Received 5 Likes on 2 Posts
To be sure Qantas PR are on the cool aid, but most Airlines do make a bit of a carry on when they get a new Aircraft type, no matter were they are on the delivery schedule.
Boe787 is offline  
Old 21st Jun 2017, 10:07
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Sydney
Age: 65
Posts: 683
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
Everyone else has waken up long time ago and they are still dreaming. I have a 1:200 scale model of a 787 painted in Qantas livery sitting on my desc for at least 5 years. I often wondered if it ever going to materialise. Guess what.....I bought it straight from Boeing website 5 years ago. Wake up Mr Joyce.....
sms777 is offline  
Old 21st Jun 2017, 15:18
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Unfortunately not the Orient
Posts: 387
Likes: 0
Received 88 Likes on 32 Posts
Why do any of you give a crap? If QF want to market an aircraft, and the public buy the hype, why shouldn't they?


Actually, please don't answer. I don't care.
SandyPalms is offline  
Old 21st Jun 2017, 15:31
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Earth
Posts: 82
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The one guarantee in this forum is the cynical and pessimistic outlook from many of the posters.

keepitrealok is offline  
Old 21st Jun 2017, 20:13
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Sydney
Posts: 298
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Anyone checked pavements limits for the B789? Currently 251100 for Perth and 238200 for Melbourne. MTOW B789 is 254011. Makes a very limiting sector even more so!
busdriver007 is offline  
Old 21st Jun 2017, 21:55
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: The Dirty South
Posts: 449
Received 21 Likes on 6 Posts
Quokka and Uluru ? So ...... a small rat-like creature and a large pink rock. How apropos. Alan must be tingling. This is as close as he's going to get, to having his name on a jet.

JPJP is offline  
Old 21st Jun 2017, 23:29
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Doomagee
Age: 11
Posts: 721
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Not in the big league Falling Leaf. That opportunity been and gone 7 years ago.
Berealgetreal is offline  
Old 22nd Jun 2017, 00:50
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Brisvegas
Posts: 3,878
Likes: 0
Received 246 Likes on 106 Posts
Anyone checked pavements limits for the B789? Currently 251100 for Perth and 238200 for Melbourne. MTOW B789 is 254011. Makes a very limiting sector even more so!
Watch that get fixed with the stroke of a pen.
Icarus2001 is offline  
Old 22nd Jun 2017, 04:31
  #20 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: South of the Equator
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
So, are United payload-limited on the ex-MEL trans-Pacific flights? Or do they get a waiver on the basis of one flight only per day?
Olddognewtricks is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.