PPRuNe Forums


Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific Airline and RPT Rumours & News in Australia, enZed and the Pacific

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 11th Aug 2017, 22:50   #141 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Asia
Posts: 337
Tiger is 100% owned by an Australian listed company that's why, forget Virgin's shareholding for a minute it's not Tiger. The Etihad/Singapore etc relationship is irrelevant.

From what I gather Tiger is controlled by Virgin. Etihad et al have no say. In saying this who profits in Tiger's earnings?
wheels_down is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12th Aug 2017, 02:46   #142 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: 3rd rock from the sun
Posts: 1,319
What's the problem 737pnf?

It's only an administrative thing. Quite smart if you ask me. Why restrict yourself for future possibilities?

morno
morno is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12th Aug 2017, 07:48   #143 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: BBN
Posts: 132
Well, no one does wheels.. like VA, Tigerair also ran at a loss about 28 or so million this FY.
SHVC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12th Aug 2017, 12:03   #144 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Brisbane
Age: 32
Posts: 26
Why?
Because the application probably cost them money. Money that they don't have.
At the very least, it cost resources within HQ time. Time (and money?) that JB/Blunty/PW should be investing in resources to perfect the 737 operation, instead of getting ready for what would require an additional type on the AOC
737pnf is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12th Aug 2017, 12:58   #145 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: brisbane
Age: 33
Posts: 24
Quote:
Originally Posted by 737pnf View Post
Why?
Because the application probably cost them money. Money that they don't have.
At the very least, it cost resources within HQ time. Time (and money?) that JB/Blunty/PW should be investing in resources to perfect the 737 operation, instead of getting ready for what would require an additional type on the AOC
What they should have done is leave TT alone and let them make money which is what they were on the cusp of doing, instead of getting involved and changing fleets which has cost $$$. I agree with fleet simplification but the 320 was perfect for the operation they were doing and doing well.
davidclarke is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12th Aug 2017, 14:27   #146 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: 3rd rock from the sun
Posts: 1,319
A321NEO would have been a much better aeroplane to do it than Old 737's.
morno is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12th Aug 2017, 19:09   #147 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Land of Oz
Posts: 74
But then leasing costs would have blown everything out even further Morno
No Idea Either is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12th Aug 2017, 20:49   #148 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Australia
Posts: 113
Quote:
Originally Posted by davidclarke View Post
What they should have done is leave TT alone and let them make money which is what they were on the cusp of doing, instead of getting involved and changing fleets which has cost $$$. I agree with fleet simplification but the 320 was perfect for the operation they were doing and doing well.
Every sentence about VA starts with "What they should have done" - either because the management are stultifying in their stupidity or they actually sit around and ask "What's the worst approach to this or that..." and then do the worst.

It is unbelievable that a company that has now lost billions would stuff around with the only part of that business that is making or about to make a profit... but... then again, this is VA.
AerialPerspective is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13th Aug 2017, 10:33   #149 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Doomagee
Age: 4
Posts: 388
The domestic Virgin B737 I'm told has only lost money for a brief period in the capacity war with QF.

Then again every pilot thinks it's their fleet that's saving the company from financial oblivion.
Berealgetreal is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13th Aug 2017, 10:38   #150 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Asia
Posts: 337
So back to the original question...

Why has the 737 operation stalled? The Airbus fleet isn't even up for lease yet. Half the fleet was meant to be gone by now (original plan).
wheels_down is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14th Aug 2017, 06:17   #151 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Australia
Posts: 417
Quote:
Half the fleet was meant to be gone by now (original plan).
There was a plan???.....
The Bullwinkle is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14th Aug 2017, 06:56   #152 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Asia
Posts: 337
Well they didn't have a Plan B, that's where they got caught. They were pretty cocky on getting that 737 AOC last November they spent millions on crewing, scheduling and even loaded all the flights for booking like it was a done deal. Then came the bad news.
wheels_down is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14th Aug 2017, 08:32   #153 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: deepest darkest recess of your mind
Posts: 927
Add to that the Bali debacle and various other F#ckups large and small, and what happens to the person presiding over it? He's now what? You couldn't make this shit up.
porch monkey is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT. The time now is 16:49.


1996-2012 The Professional Pilots Rumour Network

SEO by vBSEO 3.6.1