Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > PPRuNe Worldwide > Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific
Reload this Page >

TT-1/2 canc of nearest competitor

Wikiposts
Search
Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific Airline and RPT Rumours & News in Australia, enZed and the Pacific

TT-1/2 canc of nearest competitor

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 31st Aug 2016, 04:16
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: BNE
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
TT-1/2 canc of nearest competitor




just saw this banner advert.


Who's their nearest competitor ? Are they guilding the lily a bit ?
BNEA320 is offline  
Old 31st Aug 2016, 05:22
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Asia
Posts: 1,030
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Transitioning from a new A320 fleet to a 15 year old 737 fleet might change that.

People in glass houses come to mind..
wheels_down is offline  
Old 31st Aug 2016, 05:57
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: Sydney
Posts: 470
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
If you have half the cancellations, but 1/4 of the flights, then that's hardly a good thing.
IsDon is offline  
Old 31st Aug 2016, 06:59
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 451
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I seriously doubt whether most Tiger or Jetstar consumer behaviour is influenced by the cancellation rate.

The overarching motivation for most ticket purchases by customers on these carriers is that it be the lowest priced.

Apparently, if the marketing data is to be believed, there is significant price elasticity in the LCC domain. Fare differences of as little as $5-10 will alter consumer behaviour.

While holiday makers and infrequent flyers can get a little stroppy when they are late (or cancelled), it is regular, frequent and business travellers who are much more interested in OTP and cancellation rates.

PG
Popgun is offline  
Old 31st Aug 2016, 07:19
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: AKL
Age: 34
Posts: 182
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
https://bitre.gov.au/statistics/aviation/otp_month.aspx

Looking at July 2016

TT - 0.5% or 9 flights
JQ - 1.9% or 144 flights
VA - 3.1% or 400 flights
QF - 1.8% or 141 flights

Looks like they are making the parent company look bad.
cavemanzk is offline  
Old 31st Aug 2016, 07:41
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Australia
Posts: 617
Received 153 Likes on 48 Posts
I imagine it's to try and remove that lingering perception that if you book with Tiger you might not get there. A perception that may have had some merit 5 years back but not now.

Low cost or not, no one wants to miss the concert, party, meeting, etc. they are flying to or the lose the accomodation they already booked. That perception of unreliability must be a drag on sales.
Beer Baron is offline  
Old 31st Aug 2016, 08:41
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 63
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
When the great unwashed travel, cost and only cost is the motivating factor.

Those 15 year old 73's still have excellent dispatch reliability.

IsDon, you might fail your next medical if you get any more worked up over Tiger antics
Open Descent is offline  
Old 31st Aug 2016, 10:01
  #8 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: BNE
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Popgun
I seriously doubt whether most Tiger or Jetstar consumer behaviour is influenced by the cancellation rate.

The overarching motivation for most ticket purchases by customers on these carriers is that it be the lowest priced.

Apparently, if the marketing data is to be believed, there is significant price elasticity in the LCC domain. Fare differences of as little as $5-10 will alter consumer behaviour.

While holiday makers and infrequent flyers can get a little stroppy when they are late (or cancelled), it is regular, frequent and business travellers who are much more interested in OTP and cancellation rates.

PG
there's a huge difference between business travellers who pay their own fare(small business) & those who don't.

No you might not fly to CBR or anywhere for a business meeting that day, but going to a conference or trade show, when actual arrival time isn't critical & almost everyone paying their own way seems to be watching the dollars these days.
BNEA320 is offline  
Old 31st Aug 2016, 10:48
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Australia
Posts: 465
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
You are so insightful BNEA320/XPT. Tell me more about the ways of the world.
VH-FTS is offline  
Old 31st Aug 2016, 12:12
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: 3rd rock from the sun
Posts: 2,468
Received 310 Likes on 116 Posts
Truth hurts sometimes doesn't it Jetstar.

Sure they might not have as big a fleet, but that means that a cancellation is worth a much higher percentage.

morno

Last edited by morno; 31st Aug 2016 at 20:58.
morno is offline  
Old 31st Aug 2016, 22:48
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: byron bay
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
TT should be yelling about this so everyone can hear. Their PR company doesn't seem to be doing a very good job if we only hear about this through banner ads.


The other guys, sure made a big deal of TT's problems in the past.
TT738 is offline  
Old 1st Sep 2016, 06:23
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Australia
Posts: 465
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
And BNEA320's third personality, TT738, joins the conversation.
VH-FTS is offline  
Old 3rd Sep 2016, 07:09
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Asia
Posts: 2,372
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Even a $2 price differential can make a significant difference in bookings if it brings you out at the top of the search engine list in order of price.

Supermarkets know that eye level is buy level when displaying groceries, having your flight as the first one shown by Skyscanner or Kayak when doing a search pays off.
Metro man is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.