Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific Airline and RPT Rumours & News in Australia, enZed and the Pacific

Yet another "loan"..

Old 21st Mar 2016, 02:34
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: NSW
Posts: 4,273
Received 36 Likes on 27 Posts
Yet another "loan"..

Virgin Australia gets $425m loan from airline shareholders
TBM-Legend is offline  
Old 21st Mar 2016, 02:57
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Asia
Posts: 1,030
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
How long until Singapore takes control?

I can see SIA group consisting of the following in the next 5-10 years.

Singapore Airlines
Virgin Australia
Scoot
Silkair
Tiger Airways
wheels_down is offline  
Old 21st Mar 2016, 08:01
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: AKL
Age: 34
Posts: 182
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Our NZ, it could be an interesting year on the VA front.

With NZ making an pretty decent first half year profit, they will have some spare cash.

Wouldn't it technically be easier for NZ to purchase, VA than SQ? if NZ goes to 51% VA could just operate under New Zealand traffic rights.
cavemanzk is offline  
Old 21st Mar 2016, 08:08
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 1999
Location: Lost in Space
Posts: 275
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
An article in the Australian some days ago revealed the chairman of the board reading the law of the land.
That being the law of corporate governance and the responsibilities of the directors of a company board to act in the best interests of the business at hand. Not in accordance with the directors alternate interests abroad (read agendas). The directors being appointed by the foreign owning carriers does call into question the effect of any conflict of interest.
t_cas is offline  
Old 21st Mar 2016, 09:43
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 27
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Wouldn't it technically be easier for NZ to purchase, VA than SQ? if NZ goes to 51% VA could just operate under New Zealand traffic rights.
Ansett just turned in it's grave.
In the Soup is offline  
Old 21st Mar 2016, 10:28
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Auckland, New Zealand
Posts: 78
Received 16 Likes on 10 Posts
NZ are sort of "damned if they do and damned if they don't" really.

On one hand if they take majority shareholding it is Ansett all over again.

On the other hand if they cut VA loose it is Ansett all over again.

The only difference is that NZ is better capitalized now.
Chris2303 is online now  
Old 21st Mar 2016, 11:35
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Australia
Posts: 316
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Can we at least say ANZ. It is a company we are talking about, not a country.
Falling Leaf is offline  
Old 21st Mar 2016, 11:47
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Ozzzzzzz
Posts: 229
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Qantas are hiring soon.

Time to abandon ship?
Ultergra is offline  
Old 21st Mar 2016, 13:32
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Here and there
Posts: 3,096
Received 14 Likes on 11 Posts
Originally Posted by Falling Leaf
Can we at least say ANZ. It is a company we are talking about, not a country.
Air NZ even. They are an airline, not a bank.
AerocatS2A is offline  
Old 21st Mar 2016, 18:22
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: I'm a wanderer
Age: 43
Posts: 421
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
The loan does state that there are no rights to more equity, so all the precious Australians don't get their panties in a knot.

Air NZ learned the lesson last time around.
empacher48 is online now  
Old 22nd Mar 2016, 08:31
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: preferably somewhere colder!
Posts: 80
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
NZ is their ICAO designator is it not?! Given the chosen forum I personally assume anytime I see QF we're referring to an airline rather than the quarter finals of something or the Qatar foundation or the QF hotel in Dresden according to Google.....
NGsim is offline  
Old 22nd Mar 2016, 09:27
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 27
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by empacher48
The loan does state that there are no rights to more equity, so all the precious Australians don't get their panties in a knot.

Air NZ learned the lesson last time around.
Well that's a relief!

Thousands lost their jobs in 2001, I'm glad Air NZ learned a lesson from that
In the Soup is offline  
Old 22nd Mar 2016, 09:47
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: The Shire
Posts: 2,890
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I wonder how long it'll be until the shareholders cut it loose? The strategy was to keep Qantas weak in its own backyard and chase its premium customers.

It hasn't worked, Qantas are milking the cow again and will go after their competition while they are weakened by the dead weight in Australia.

I'd imagine a renewed push into singapores backyard, just as they're nipping at ANZ right now.

I wonder if that'll mean 78's to to go after scoot?

Interesting times.
The Green Goblin is offline  
Old 22nd Mar 2016, 10:59
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: FL290
Posts: 763
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
I wonder if that'll mean 78's to to go after scoot?

Um SQ is the biggest owner in VA so no
1a sound asleep is offline  
Old 22nd Mar 2016, 11:41
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: melbourne
Posts: 289
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I think you will find it is Air NZ #1 then Etihad #2 and Singapore #3 in the shareholdings
coaldemon is offline  
Old 22nd Mar 2016, 11:48
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: FL290
Posts: 763
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by coaldemon
I think you will find it is Air NZ #1 then Etihad #2 and Singapore #3 in the shareholdings
You are right

As at 16 September 2015 major shareholders were

Air New Zealand (25.90%)
Singapore Airlines (22.79%)
Etihad Airways (24.18%)
Branson (9.96%)
1a sound asleep is offline  
Old 22nd Mar 2016, 12:14
  #17 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: NSW
Posts: 4,273
Received 36 Likes on 27 Posts
With fuel being at a record low, late model aircraft etc why the hell are they not making a bucketload of money? Not good having to run off to the three ugly sisters to borrow cash to stay at the dance! Come on Cinderella>>
TBM-Legend is offline  
Old 22nd Mar 2016, 12:32
  #18 (permalink)  
Keg

Nunc est bibendum
 
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 5,583
Received 11 Likes on 2 Posts
Question

Maybe Joyce and Strambi were right when they said that the Borg knows how to spend money but not so good on bringing it back in?
Keg is offline  
Old 22nd Mar 2016, 12:41
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: FL290
Posts: 763
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by TBM-Legend
With fuel being at a record low, late model aircraft etc why the hell are they not making a bucketload of money? Not good having to run off to the three ugly sisters to borrow cash to stay at the dance! Come on Cinderella>>
They hedged fuel....

And I quote from a news story

"Virgin Australia chairman Elizabeth Bryan says the airline intends to scrutinise the structure of its balance sheet and examine whether it needs to be improved after coming through the bloody capacity war with Qantas.

Ms Bryan, who is a former chairman of oil refiner Caltex, also defended the company’s hedging position, which analysts have suggested prevented Virgin from enjoying the same windfall from the big drop in oil prices as its arch rival, noting “it is not that one way is right and one way is wrong, that some person is smarter and one is more stupid’’.
1a sound asleep is offline  
Old 22nd Mar 2016, 12:50
  #20 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Devonport Tasmania Australia
Posts: 1,837
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Could this be a run by the Asian lion to get what they have wanted since before the AN collapse? Traffic rights on the Pacific ex Australia? It smells of the early stages of a long term engineering regime.

It was quite obvious (to me at least - and I could be totally wrong but don't think so) that SQ had with 2 board members shifted the fate of AN by placing NZ, with 2 members on their board in a position to take control of the cash stripped and foundering AN empire, knowing they were totally inadequate in being able to rescue the airline.

Then, the Lion would ride in on a white charger, rescue Ansett and be the good guy securing the future of the Airline but also giving them total access to the trans Pacific rights Ansett held. Great in theory but beautifully protected from any loss of face with NZ as the interface if something went wrong. It did - 9/11 - 48 hours before the axe fell and Ansett was grounded.

No white knight arrived, beautiful shielded by their blind using NZ with the board members delightfully invisible. No face lost there. Now - the next move.

The rights still being the holy grail for SQ, an immediate threat arrived with the attempt by Ansett crew and staff to restart the airline with a bid from the employee group. Bid came up from the employee group and various others.

Funny thing that - the Fox - Lew bid was tentatively accepted after drawn out negotiations and the funds from the pilots/staff group and others had expended their viable funds.

Strange that the bid was then withdrawn. One of the 2 involved was at a local club 12 months later and I asked the question on how big was the payout from SQ? I am 127 kilos and was shuffled out of the way by minders of a certain person who had assumed a non healthy purple colour.

So - bottom line. SQ still want Pacific rights ex Australia. Virgin are operating trans Pacific ex Australia. The Ansett collapse failed due to 9/11. Wounds licked, now let's wait.

Any SQ members on the Virgin Australia board?

Danger Will Robinson, Danger.

Best all

EWL
Eastwest Loco is offline  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.