Wikiposts
Search
Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific Airline and RPT Rumours & News in Australia, enZed and the Pacific

Qantas and the 787-900

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 24th Mar 2015, 04:26
  #261 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 356
Received 115 Likes on 46 Posts
Alan loved you all along. He just wanted to see you commit self harm first.
No he didn't and still doesn't.

But what he does see is the share price at worst, holding its current position or growing as long as there's no threat of industrial action.

I'd be feeling reasonably keen to avoid confrontation and thus hurrying the negotiations too if the value of my bonus was tied to the share price.
C441 is offline  
Old 24th Mar 2015, 06:09
  #262 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Inside their OODA loop
Posts: 243
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The other issue is that oil is freakishly low and if (when) it goes back to $110 per barrel then we (international) will likely be losing money again
What does the data say?


For more information see Annual Average Oil Prices in Table Form.
The red line on the chart shows oil prices adjusted for inflation in January 2014 dollars. The black line indicates the nominal price (in other words the price you would have actually paid at the time).Current prices as of December 17th 2014 are $49.50 down significantly from recent highs but still above the average inflation adjusted price of $41.70 from 1946 - 2014.
source: InflationData: Historical Oil Prices Chart

FYSTI is offline  
Old 24th Mar 2015, 06:58
  #263 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: thelodge
Posts: 139
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
FYSTI,

You make a very good point.
Oil is currently in oversupply. Shale production in the USA is still high.
Oil is forecast to stay low for a considerable time.
The whole point of the 787 is the lower maintenance cost AND lower fuel burn should I fact the unexpected happen and prices rise again.
That alone will be the future proofing of QF.

Pilot salaries are not the make or break here. They are 1-5% of the overall cost.
Im not suggesting some win wins not be considered.
Just don't think it wise to sell the farm at the start of a big turnaround.
There is no rush, unless your Qantas.
fearcampaign is offline  
Old 24th Mar 2015, 08:06
  #264 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: AUS
Posts: 236
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Average inflation adjusted prices do not account for reduced supply - hence the growth of shale oil etc - becasue they are only adjusted for INFLATION and not for supply source availability. There is a reason that countries like the USA are trying to boost domestic sources of oil. The Saudis have learnt from history and want to starve these guys out of the game with their cost base of $10/barrel. That is the single reason proces are at current levels - because the Saudis are choosing to maintain OPEC output for their own selfish, long term reasons and they could change their minds at anytime. Your data also doesn't adjust for increasing future demand for oil with the emergence of China, India and other countries' middle classes. That's why I'd rather go with my future scenario of oil heading back towards $100 than your 'inflation adjusted' figure from the past. It's a nice graph looking BACK, but I don't think it tells us much looking FORWARD. Why don't you start your graph even further back at the year 1800 so the average price oil is 5 bucks? So what? It would just been even more irrelevant.

Anyway I think this is meant to be about the long haul EBA...

Airlines typically operate on proft margins of less than 4% (http://www.iata.org/pressroom/pr/Pag...-12-10-01.aspx) and labour costs are one of the few major differences, since fuel and aircraft costs are much less variable between airlines. To that extent, pilots costs absolutely can be the difference between a route being profitable or unprotiable over the medium to long term - we shouldn't stick our heads in the sand about that. That doesn't mean selling the farm though, I do agree, but I don't think we should be militant in not being willing to structure our terms differently to reflect the possibility of more proftiable ULH operations over the next decade or two and I'm bloody sure most pilots feel the same way. There will be plenty of politics to be played and slogans to be thrown around by a small number of senior pilots with this EBA, but in the end the majority will decide.

Last edited by Tuner 2; 24th Mar 2015 at 08:27.
Tuner 2 is offline  
Old 26th Mar 2015, 21:39
  #265 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: thelodge
Posts: 139
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From the Sydney Morning Herald

"In February, over 2600 members of the Transport Workers Union working at Qantas agreed to the wage freeze in return for commitments that they would continue to work under the existing terms if Qantas creates a new corporate entity for its international business, improved consultation and training provisions and access to long service leave".

TWU got to keep existing terms and conditions with a pay freeze back in September.
fearcampaign is offline  
Old 28th Mar 2015, 23:45
  #266 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: australia
Posts: 38
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thumbs up

New International Hub being looked at out of Perth using 777x/A350 to open up Europe!
Jetstar to get remaining 789's!
"The futures so bright gotta wear shades"
howyoulikethat is offline  
Old 29th Mar 2015, 04:02
  #267 (permalink)  
bdcer
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Here we go again.....What's your source howyoulikethat? I reckon we should have to substantiate any rumours with a source (other than 'from a mate who would know'!).
 
Old 29th Mar 2015, 22:54
  #268 (permalink)  
Keg

Nunc est bibendum
 
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 5,583
Received 11 Likes on 2 Posts
Lightbulb

The 789s can do the same out of Perth. Not sure where JQ would fly 50 789s
Keg is offline  
Old 29th Mar 2015, 23:30
  #269 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Australia
Posts: 351
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
Based on current profitability measures.... Pretty much anywhere in the world really!

Bourke to Halls Ck
Mt Gambier to Napier
Katherine to Mt Hagen

Ok, ok. I'll stop giving them all the good ideas.
OneDotLow is offline  
Old 26th Jan 2016, 23:12
  #270 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Sydney
Age: 65
Posts: 362
Likes: 0
Received 12 Likes on 4 Posts
10 months since the last post.

Qantas 787-9s likely to fly MEL-DFW | Plane Talking

There are credible rumours that the seat count in the Qantas Boeing 787-9s due from the end of 2017 will be a low, and comfortable 235, and Melbourne-Dallas will be one of the routes.

Another new route mentioned is Perth-London, presumably via Dubai, although with improved bad weather landing systems at the Perth end, non-stop flights eastbound mightn’t be out of the question.


These are among the details heard in informed gossip. The real announcement is believed to be made this April, at least at this stage, although there is another high visibility option for Qantas to provide details when it announces its anticipated record first half year profit result on 23 February.


According to information the configuration of the 787-9s will be 42 business class seats in a new product, apparently further improved compared to the new J class sleepers now being fitted in the Qantas A330 fleet.


There will be 28 premium economy seats, and 165 in normal economy. It wasn’t known if the economy seats will be the originally intended eight across totally ‘dreamy’ seats Boeing intended for its Dreamliners, or the horrid nine across bum crushers so enthusiastically endorsed by sadistic bean counters for many 787 configurations.


But on a 17 hour flight between Dallas and Melbourne, there is hope, as well as a need on humanitarian grounds, for the seats to as wide as those on the Qantas A380s that fly its Sydney-Dallas Fort Worth dailies.
73to91 is offline  
Old 31st Jan 2016, 08:37
  #271 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: melbourne
Posts: 164
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Townsville refueller rumor.
744 ER to have cabin reconfig extended life past 2020.
789 SYDNEY LAX MEL LAX SYD DFW SYD-DXB EK only to LHR
A380 Reduced to 7 to 11 hour sectors high yield Asia routes.
A330 Current with new routes opening.
2017/2018 interesting times ahead.
griffin one is offline  
Old 31st Jan 2016, 08:51
  #272 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Harbour Master Place
Posts: 662
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
A380 Reduced to 7 to 11 hour sectors high yield Asia routes.
That will damn near kill the barons.
CurtainTwitcher is offline  
Old 31st Jan 2016, 10:18
  #273 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Great Southern Land
Age: 72
Posts: 511
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
That will damn near kill the barons.
Why so, since there would be less time zone shift, I would have thought it would have extended their life expectancy!
Offchocks is offline  
Old 31st Jan 2016, 21:09
  #274 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: The Universe
Age: 58
Posts: 270
Likes: 0
Received 12 Likes on 2 Posts
Townsville refueller rumor.
744 ER to have cabin reconfig extended life past 2020.
Does the refueller have any word on whether the last two 744s not to be refitted are getting the new cabin reconfigs ?
standard unit is offline  
Old 1st Feb 2016, 03:11
  #275 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 265
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
A380 Reduced to 7 to 11 hour sectors high yield Asia routes.
Haha! The TSV refueller must have had an evil grin on his face when he announced that pearl!

The only problem with that theory is that there are no high yield Asia routes.
Derfred is offline  
Old 1st Feb 2016, 03:44
  #276 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: sydney
Posts: 1,625
Received 600 Likes on 170 Posts
Why would they bother to reconfigure the last two 747s when they can continue to treat the poor paying customers with the contempt with which Qantas believe they deserve. They did it with the classics for years. Save the money so someone can have good KPIs and a bonus. Remember I think EBU sat at Avalon for so long that eventualy they couldn't fix it due to corrosion, but they had purchased all the interior parts already.
dragon man is offline  
Old 1st Feb 2016, 10:11
  #277 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: The Universe
Age: 58
Posts: 270
Likes: 0
Received 12 Likes on 2 Posts
Yes as somebody who deals directly with the passengers and their disappointment with the worn out non reconfigured 744s I know what you mean.

All things considered you'd imagine doing the last two would make sense.

Oh, that right.......

British Airways Stays Loyal to Its Boeing 747-400s
standard unit is offline  
Old 1st Feb 2016, 14:14
  #278 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: WLG (FORMERLY PER)
Posts: 1,195
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
The interior on the upgraded birds is superb, I'd hate to be a punter down the back on the old models
topend3 is offline  
Old 1st Feb 2016, 20:39
  #279 (permalink)  
Keg

Nunc est bibendum
 
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 5,583
Received 11 Likes on 2 Posts
The only problem with that theory is that there are no high yield Asia routes.
That runs contrary to the internal chatter which suggests that load factors and yield to all Asian destinations is running at historical highs.

Admittedly, that may mean slightly less crap than they were but the person I spoke to about it in December is in a position to know. The term he used was 'making Sh!tloads'.
Keg is offline  
Old 1st Feb 2016, 22:09
  #280 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: everywhere
Posts: 54
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I was fortunate enough to travel JFK-LAX-BNE on OJM a few weeks back in J and it was very very average. Nothing wrong with 744, but the seats & IFE were rubbish.

OJT & OEH on the way over was light years better, maybe not the best around but I think perfectly acceptable product.
cyclone8888 is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.