REX minimum requirements
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Posts: 25
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
REX minimum requirements
Are Rex serious? They want 2000 hours TT with 500 Multi under IFR. That's for an FO position! The only other operator that wants those sort of hours is Cobham. Anyone care to comment?
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Sydney
Posts: 246
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I think these requirements are fair enough.
After all, they would want people that can move into the left hand a year after joining, if that was to ever occur. As we know, those sort of hr requirements are not a guarantee that it will be smooth but the odds are it will.
Saabs and aircraft of their type don't have Auto Throttles etc (from memory, Auto Pilot can not even be hooked up to VNAV). No ILS to ILS flying but dark night approaches with CTAF traffic etc and the Saab just loves icing up while you are at it. It can be very demanding work (although Regional Managements don't appreciate that fact one bit).
You young ones have been very spoilt over the last 10 years.
Go back to the late 90's when there were 10 drivers for every job.
Skytrans in Cairns had a fleet of Titans/Cessna 402's and Cessna 310's.
Up in the Torres Straits they had a couple of Britten Norman Islanders where you spent your first year living like an animal. In 1999 when I was sniffing around, the requirements for a taste of that glamourous life was.
2,500 TT
700 Multi Command.
However, when there is huge Airline growth for 2yrs every decade, all of a sudden, flying an aeroplane apparently becomes easy and requirements tumble.
After all, they would want people that can move into the left hand a year after joining, if that was to ever occur. As we know, those sort of hr requirements are not a guarantee that it will be smooth but the odds are it will.
Saabs and aircraft of their type don't have Auto Throttles etc (from memory, Auto Pilot can not even be hooked up to VNAV). No ILS to ILS flying but dark night approaches with CTAF traffic etc and the Saab just loves icing up while you are at it. It can be very demanding work (although Regional Managements don't appreciate that fact one bit).
You young ones have been very spoilt over the last 10 years.
Go back to the late 90's when there were 10 drivers for every job.
Skytrans in Cairns had a fleet of Titans/Cessna 402's and Cessna 310's.
Up in the Torres Straits they had a couple of Britten Norman Islanders where you spent your first year living like an animal. In 1999 when I was sniffing around, the requirements for a taste of that glamourous life was.
2,500 TT
700 Multi Command.
However, when there is huge Airline growth for 2yrs every decade, all of a sudden, flying an aeroplane apparently becomes easy and requirements tumble.
The published numbers are minimums. Having a lower minimum doesn't guarantee that they will take anyone with that experience, it just gives the recruiters more options.
When you get a hiring boom many of the operators are all competing from the same talent pool, so the more experienced troops get soaked up quickly, if they set the minimums at the level they expect to hire at, then there is no room to move. If they set a lower minimum (but still at a point that they can manage from a training perspective) then they can look at the demographic of the new hires and perhaps mix them up so you have a combination of experienced and less experienced people, who will have different expectations in relation to command, type changes and base transfers etc (potentially will retire at different points as well).
Single pilot ifr ops are the hardest thing you will ever do. Regional flying isn't as hard in many ways, but harder in others - a much greater reliance on the crew, throwing bags, trim sheets, briefing/feeding/managing the punters, multiple sectors into uncontrolled ports/ctafs etc. lower pay than the airlines for harder (in my opinion) work.
In many ways I would funnel the more experienced people into the regional style operations and the less experienced ones into the jet, but that isn't what the prospective new hire wants, for valid and reasonable reasons.
If I could figure out a way of paying regional pilots more it would be good but unlikely given the way the market for pilots works.
When you get a hiring boom many of the operators are all competing from the same talent pool, so the more experienced troops get soaked up quickly, if they set the minimums at the level they expect to hire at, then there is no room to move. If they set a lower minimum (but still at a point that they can manage from a training perspective) then they can look at the demographic of the new hires and perhaps mix them up so you have a combination of experienced and less experienced people, who will have different expectations in relation to command, type changes and base transfers etc (potentially will retire at different points as well).
Single pilot ifr ops are the hardest thing you will ever do. Regional flying isn't as hard in many ways, but harder in others - a much greater reliance on the crew, throwing bags, trim sheets, briefing/feeding/managing the punters, multiple sectors into uncontrolled ports/ctafs etc. lower pay than the airlines for harder (in my opinion) work.
In many ways I would funnel the more experienced people into the regional style operations and the less experienced ones into the jet, but that isn't what the prospective new hire wants, for valid and reasonable reasons.
If I could figure out a way of paying regional pilots more it would be good but unlikely given the way the market for pilots works.
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,186
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
They want 2000 hours TT with 500 Multi under IFR. That's for an FO position!
They want that experience because they know there is a huge oversupply of commercial pilots in Australia and it is a way of culling out the mob. Yet elsewhere you have 300 hour pilots flying as second in command on all sorts of overseas jet transports including the 777 and A330. From the sublime to the ridiculous.
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Australia
Age: 44
Posts: 214
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Another reason being is because Rex are operating under a low capacity AOC. Without the books nearby I can't remember the exact requirements but when operating in this low capacity the minimums are higher. The likes of Qlink and VARA flying bigger aircraft operate under a high capacity AOC (issued by the regulator), even though link have a couple of -200s left they are still operating under the same high capacity AOC.
I stand to be corrected though.
I stand to be corrected though.
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Australia
Posts: 26
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I would suggest they have high direct entry requirements because they have a cadet scheme. As Boney said, they want guys who can move into the LHS relatively quickly, hence the 2000hr min requirement.
Originally Posted by Altimeters
Another reason being is because Rex are operating under a low capacity AOC. Without the books nearby I can't remember the exact requirements but when operating in this low capacity the minimums are higher.
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: The GAFA
Posts: 59
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
It's a command requirement for low capacity RPT. Refer CAO 82.3 Appendix 4:
Aeroplanes exceeding 5 700 kg MTOW
Air transport pilot (aeroplane) licence
Command (multi-engine aeroplane) instrument rating
2 000 hours total experience as a pilot, that includes:
500 hours as pilot in command (or acting as pilot in command under supervision) on multi-engine aeroplanes under the I.F.R.; and
50 hours as pilot in command (or acting as pilot in command under supervision) on the aeroplane type; and
100 hours experience as a pilot on night operations.
Aeroplanes exceeding 5 700 kg MTOW
Air transport pilot (aeroplane) licence
Command (multi-engine aeroplane) instrument rating
2 000 hours total experience as a pilot, that includes:
500 hours as pilot in command (or acting as pilot in command under supervision) on multi-engine aeroplanes under the I.F.R.; and
50 hours as pilot in command (or acting as pilot in command under supervision) on the aeroplane type; and
100 hours experience as a pilot on night operations.
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Downunder
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Rex are essentially employing direct entry soon-to-be captains, therefore they need to meet the CAO requirements.
Snake is correct, the guys I know in VARA and QLink all had well over the minimum requirements before they got a look in.
Snake is correct, the guys I know in VARA and QLink all had well over the minimum requirements before they got a look in.
Bottums Up
They want 2000 hours TT with 500 Multi under IFR. That's for an FO position! ...
Anyone care to comment?
Anyone care to comment?
So, not too onerous I'd have thought.
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,186
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
500 hours as pilot in command (or acting as pilot in command under supervision) on multi-engine aeroplanes under the I.F.R.; and
50 hours as pilot in command (or acting as pilot in command under supervision) on the aeroplane type; and
50 hours as pilot in command (or acting as pilot in command under supervision) on the aeroplane type; and
I have suspected this for some time. ICUS is the new command time. After all, they are equal according to the highlighted text
Next we will hear is dual will be equivalent to ICUS (after all you are under supervision)
CASA watered down the requirements for the ATPL some years ago.
They reduced the Non ICUS component (actual command time) from 100 hours down to 70. As most integrated Cadet schemes produce only around 70 hours of real command experience, this eliminated one barrier to former Cadets attaining a Command. Particularly on Low-Cap Ops.
They reduced the Non ICUS component (actual command time) from 100 hours down to 70. As most integrated Cadet schemes produce only around 70 hours of real command experience, this eliminated one barrier to former Cadets attaining a Command. Particularly on Low-Cap Ops.
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Sydney
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Probably a few experienced Nth QLD pilots maybe jumping ship soon to fill the seats of the new routes (REX) have picked up from Skytrans. Think you will find most if not all would qualify with those requirements?
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Stag Lane
Age: 52
Posts: 77
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Apparently REX also now require an Aerobatics Rating
https://flightaware.com/live/flight/...930Z/YWYY/YMML
(I'm sure it's just a Flightaware error. Happened during the severe storms in Melbourne Monday morning)
https://flightaware.com/live/flight/...930Z/YWYY/YMML
(I'm sure it's just a Flightaware error. Happened during the severe storms in Melbourne Monday morning)
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Montana
Posts: 81
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Are they only hiring Australians? . I applied but never heard anything, have Beech 1900, Saab 340, and -145 time in the US. I heard they picked up a few pilots from Colgan, but not sure if it's true.