Wikiposts
Search
Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific Airline and RPT Rumours & News in Australia, enZed and the Pacific

More quality journalism.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 30th Jul 2014, 01:01
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Sydney Australia
Posts: 2,303
Received 9 Likes on 4 Posts
More quality journalism.

It seems that the continual inability of news reporters to even get something as fundamental as an aircraft type right, Cessna/jabiru, has now extended to delusions of expert commentary on the vulnerability of aircraft to attack by surface to air missiles.

Yesterday on ABC news 24 the female presenter commented that overflights of Iraq by QANTAS are safe because they fly at altitudes of up to 40 thousand feet. She made the sage observation that there is an enormous difference between 33 thousand feet and the higher levels that QANTAS operate at!

54 years ago Francis Gary Powers, flying a U2 spy plane was shot down over the former Soviet Union by an SA-2 Guideline missile. He was operating at an altitude of up to 65 thousand feet!

No air breathing aircraft is safe from these threats.

Lady, You are an idiot!

Last edited by KRUSTY 34; 30th Jul 2014 at 06:38.
KRUSTY 34 is offline  
Old 30th Jul 2014, 01:51
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Back again.
Posts: 1,140
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Reading the posts about MH17, the older BUK missiles were capable of 42,000ft. Newer ones to 70K plus.
Lodown is offline  
Old 30th Jul 2014, 04:00
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Sale, Australia
Age: 80
Posts: 3,832
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
One Blackbird collected a very small piece of shrapnel in 1967 over Hanoi from an SA-2 (at least eight were fired at him) at some 80,000 feet. Only time one was hit.
No air breathing aircraft is safe from these threats
Quite correct.
Brian Abraham is offline  
Old 30th Jul 2014, 08:02
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Colchester
Age: 40
Posts: 454
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
More quality journalism.

To be specific that would have been an A-12 Oxcart...

But yeah, below 10,000 and ground-based guns can get you, anywhere in the atmosphere missiles can get you.
Dash8driver1312 is offline  
Old 30th Jul 2014, 08:05
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Australia
Posts: 313
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Even in low earth orbit, missiles can get you if a sufficiently resourced adversary wants you gone badly enough.

Anti-satellite weapon - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Last edited by bankrunner; 30th Jul 2014 at 08:24.
bankrunner is offline  
Old 30th Jul 2014, 10:00
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Sale, Australia
Age: 80
Posts: 3,832
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Aircraft go by many names, Oxcart was the CIA program to developed the A-12, and the aircraft did go by that name in some quarters. The 71 was a USAF development based on the A-12, that is they converted it from single seat to two. Both aircraft went by the name Habu, and Blackbird because of the colour.

Just more quality journalism.
Brian Abraham is offline  
Old 30th Jul 2014, 11:19
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Sydney
Age: 65
Posts: 683
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
I think Richard Branson may have to rethink his flights too.....those damn Russians(sorry...Ukranians) could spoil his day.
sms777 is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.