PPRuNe Forums

Go Back   PPRuNe Forums > PPRuNe Worldwide > Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific
Forgotten your Username/Password?


Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific Airline and RPT Rumours & News in Australia, enZed and the Pacific


Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 19th Sep 2012, 22:52   #21 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: vegas, not 'las', or 'bris', but the other one
Posts: 61
Fleet Pay?

What about fleet pay?

What happened with that?

"Il Douche" was supposedly all for it, just because he is a top bloke......
mince is offline   Reply
Old 21st Sep 2012, 09:09   #22 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Aus
Posts: 19
Quote:
Gobble, it wasn't about the salaries.

You sure about that? VIPA Executive Director Simon O’Hara says differently, from the murdoch press:

Quote:
"What we're saying essentially is that Virgin Australia's bank statement is back in the black in good part because of the effort of the loyal workforce and that loyal workforce needs to be paid accordingly," Mr O'Hara said.
Quote:
He said the union was unhappy with the remuneration offered and the way in which the EBA negotiations had concluded with the addition of last-minute amendments.
Quote:
He would not quantify the difference between the union and company on pay, but said the pilots were not necessarily looking for parity with Qantas.
Quote:
"If the main competition in the market domestically is Qantas, then it's time that the pilots who are driving the reforms and bringing forward greater competition get a share of those profits and get paid accordingly."
Just to recap.

Current Base Pay
EMB $152,710
B737 $190,889
A330 $199,369

Proposed Base Pay

EMB July 2012 $164,927, July 2015 $185,504
B737 July 2012 $198,525, July 2015 $217,986
A330 July 2012 $217,312, July 2015 $256,146

FO’s on 65%/60%/55%

I never bet my left one, but I’ll put money on the above wages not getting any better overall. Some may go up, but it will be at the expense of someone else.
leakyboats is offline   Reply
Old 22nd Sep 2012, 06:07   #23 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: AUS
Posts: 328
Stunned silence gives the Company the upper hand!

Where too from here?
Spotlight is online now   Reply
Old 22nd Sep 2012, 08:17   #24 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Jan 1999
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 561
Why does it have to be a case of either having the upper hand?

Surely the employees are there to make a buck as is the company. Wouldn't it be better if there was a mutually acceptable position where each group got some of what they wanted?
Dehavillanddriver is offline   Reply
Old 22nd Sep 2012, 11:10   #25 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: In the clouds
Posts: 226
Because a corporations desire for cost cutting is eternal and insatiable. The utopian ideal of win\win is a fairytale for the adult world.
AirborneSoon is offline   Reply
Old 22nd Sep 2012, 21:02   #26 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Mar 1999
Location: Australia
Age: 42
Posts: 186
My understanding is that the pilot group did not want fleet pay.

Last edited by Roger Greendeck; 22nd Sep 2012 at 21:03.
Roger Greendeck is offline   Reply
Old 22nd Sep 2012, 22:03   #27 (permalink)
Keg

Nunc est bibendum
 
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 4,089
Then the 'pilot group' hasn't thought the issue all the way through. More rightly, no one has taken the time to explain the issue to them.

Fleet pay is a way of keeping your internal cost pressures down (recuces cross training costs) and reduces most of ithe major inequity between fleets. You should be avoiding at all costs things that promote disunity within the pilot group and nothing will do that more than something that will distort pay, whether or not to take promotion, etc. You only have to see the self serving behaviour of people in other airlines who believe that S/Os being paid more than wide body F/Os is a fair and just outcome to see where this road can take you.

Last edited by Keg; 22nd Sep 2012 at 22:04.
Keg is offline   Reply
Old 22nd Sep 2012, 22:05   #28 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Melbourne
Age: 49
Posts: 3
DHD

You mean like the EBA that was knocked back!!!!
BTDT1963 is offline   Reply
Old 23rd Sep 2012, 00:00   #29 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: within a circle in a spiral, within a wheel within a wheel, never ending or beginning on an ever spinning reel.
Posts: 454
The Pilot group don't want fleet pay and the CEO doesn't want fleet pay. The CEO has even made public statements about pilots being payed based on the size of the aircraft they fly.

Fleet pay was discussed, discussed, discussed then shot down, cremated, buried and exorcised. It's gone. Please let's not go there again lest that poltergeist gets back out.
psycho joe is offline   Reply
Old 23rd Sep 2012, 07:26   #30 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: at home
Posts: 106
For all the reasons keg mentioned, tiered fleet pay that recognises length of service is without doubt the best system in my view. Trouble is, either a pilot somewhere will have to take a pay cut, or the Company will have to pay extra to get it in.

Neither of those things are going to happen, so Fleet Pay is, and will remain, a pipe dream.
virginexcess is offline   Reply
Old 23rd Sep 2012, 09:31   #31 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Eastside
Posts: 502
Quote:
The Pilot group don't want fleet pay
. Maybe not the 73 drivers, but I'm pretty certain the ejet guys would like it. Anyway as you say, the majority of the group don't want it and it's not gonna happen.
grrowler is offline   Reply
Old 23rd Sep 2012, 11:02   #32 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: pprune
Posts: 87
So what happens now? Back to the drawing board? I find it interesting that AFAP endorsed it, yet the result was pretty negative
atlas12 is offline   Reply
Old 23rd Sep 2012, 11:30   #33 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 680
Quote:
So what happens now? Back to the drawing board? I find it interesting that AFAP endorsed it, yet the result was pretty negative
VIPA didn't endorse it though as I understand it. Are many people members of both unions?

If not, is the vote outcome in line with the split of pilots between AFAP and VIPA?

Trying to work out if everyone voted along 'party lines' or on their own.
mcgrath50 is offline   Reply
Old 23rd Sep 2012, 23:44   #34 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: brisbane
Posts: 386
Lets not forget the Union is there to represent the members.
A certain Union endorsed the EBA doc without canvassing the members opinion. Yet another EBA where the long established Union endorses a Doc the majority thinks is less than optimal.
Why endorse something that the majority of union members thinks shouldn't see the light of day???
greenslopes is offline   Reply
Old 24th Sep 2012, 03:05   #35 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: 41,000'
Posts: 253
Well my take is we pay our union fees so that they do that all that hard work for us. They can pick it apart and view the good from the bad, come to a decision and let us know. Why would they need to ask every member and say what do you think?? Thats what we're paying them for!!
piston broke again is offline   Reply
Old 24th Sep 2012, 06:05   #36 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: brisbane
Posts: 386
I pay my union fees therefore I no longer need to think.......... Great.
greenslopes is offline   Reply
Old 24th Sep 2012, 06:10   #37 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: 41,000'
Posts: 253
Maybe a bad choice of words...they give their recommendation - they are representative pilots after all.
piston broke again is offline   Reply
Old 24th Sep 2012, 06:26   #38 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Eastside
Posts: 502
I pay my union fees and they also want me to do their job (ie disseminate an EBA without a legal background and give it a thumbs up or down before they can state their professional opinion)...Great.
grrowler is offline   Reply
Old 24th Sep 2012, 09:18   #39 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Lisbon
Posts: 608
Voting with your feet is one other option. I did and haven't looked back. I am very content where I am now working, and even more happy that I no longer have to endure the brown drivel that leaks from HR's mouths. HR in any airline are no more useful than an infected hemorrhoid, and some more than others to be certain.
Too many people blame the Unions for the shite deals that are struck. That is merely misdirected blame and an easy scapegoat. A lack of unity among pilots and greasy pole sliding HR footstools are the biggest problem. Try this for size - ALL pilots stick together, vote 100% united, THEN when the proposal is rejected by HR and the Execs you all put in a 100% united vote of no confidence in specific Execs and their HR minions. Watch them fall!! The Yanks are a great example with their steel, maritime and selected industrial unions. A united blue collar workforce with giant balls wins the fight.
Cactusjack is online now   Reply
Old 24th Sep 2012, 12:34   #40 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Aus
Posts: 19
Missed this bit

Quote:
The pilot negotiations are muddied at Virgin because of the rivalry between the AFAP and VIPA, a group associated with the Qantas-based Australian and International Pilots Association.
VAIPA. Now I understand. After seeing first hand how things get out of control with AIPA trying to represent Jetstar pilots, hardly suprising to see this getting out of control at VA. I’ve got good mates doing this Locking in $256,146 for A330 skippers and $166,495 for A330 FO’s would have been smart.

Oh well, lets see VAIPA pull a rabbit out of the hat.
leakyboats is offline   Reply
 
 
This ad will disappear if you login
Reply
 


Thread Tools


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT. The time now is 21:18.


vBulletin® v3.8.7, Copyright ©2000-2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
SEO by vBSEO 3.6.1
© 1996-2012 The Professional Pilots Rumour Network

As these are anonymous forums the origins of the contributions may be opposite to what may be apparent. In fact the press may use it, or the unscrupulous, or sciolists*, to elicit certain reactions.

*"sciolist"... Noun, archaic. "a person who pretends to be knowledgeable and well informed".