Wikiposts
Search
Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific Airline and RPT Rumours & News in Australia, enZed and the Pacific

QANTAS - WHERE TO NOW?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 4th May 2012, 08:45
  #281 (permalink)  
Keg

Nunc est bibendum
 
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 5,583
Received 11 Likes on 2 Posts
Of course. Yet again the domestic network will be left with an ageing fleet due for lots of heavy maintenance whilst the LCC gets all the shiny new stuff. Just another thing to show that this mob isn't serious about running a premium carrier.
Keg is offline  
Old 4th May 2012, 09:50
  #282 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Australia
Posts: 308
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
the domestic network will be left with an ageing fleet due for lots of heavy maintenance
Which will now be done where?
Captain Gidday is offline  
Old 4th May 2012, 10:50
  #283 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Hicks House
Age: 77
Posts: 88
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
There will be Qantas painted 787's.

It will be operated by the same mob who operate Qantas painted 738's.

They are cheaper and AIPA failed to win the case in court to stop Qantas from operating in this way. 787's will never be flown by a mainline pilot (unless on LWOP).
Wedcue is offline  
Old 4th May 2012, 11:08
  #284 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Sydney
Posts: 138
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It's called business... Something beyond your recognition
Cargo744 is offline  
Old 4th May 2012, 15:36
  #285 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: London-Thailand-Australia
Age: 15
Posts: 1,057
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Investors have expressed reservations about Qantas delaying the delivery of the A380s, saying it was pursuing short-term gains at the expense of long-term growth.
Will Seddon, a portfolio manager at White Funds Management, said Qantas was delaying efficiencies brought by new A380s, which would be critical to turning around its loss-making international business, in order to defend itself in the domestic market from Virgin's advances.
''It seems to be illogical and not great for investors. They shouldn't be taking the bait this easily. The key metric is not market share, the key metric is profitability,'' he said. ''As an investor, I would be concerned now that there is a market-share war going on, which is ultimately going to translate into a price war.''
It appears the mood is changing with some investor analysts, certainly not as positive as this time last year.. The market has shifted on the domestic front to become an interesting battle. As I see it, Virgin is a much happier airline than Qantas, JB has done a wonderful job delivering positive vibes for the product. It is clear to me the Q management have no idea how to motivate employees.

Basically this current lot of managers are out of their depth, have no feeling for the pride Qantas employees have in the company, and have no feel for the way the Company used to be perceived by the wider aviation community, a recipe for loss of market share as airlines have always been a people business. This new breed of "clinical bean counting" managers are are slowly but surely choking the life out of the business promoting its traditional customers to look elsewhere..

This will only be reversed if the management comes to its senses by redirecting the B787 back into mainline. As I said previously on this thread, Jetstar has very little brand power with the punters in Asia compared to the Qantas brand.

AJ & BB keep telling us otherwise which is a downright blatant lie or wishful thinking at best.

Last edited by TIMA9X; 4th May 2012 at 15:49.
TIMA9X is offline  
Old 4th May 2012, 17:10
  #286 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Sydney
Posts: 379
Likes: 0
Received 17 Likes on 5 Posts
I find it interesting that Qantas is feeling threatened by Virgin. They feel they need to do something to protect market share. That would assume that Virgin is gaining market share. So, you would have to also assume that by engaging its workforce, developing service, investing in product and moving away from low cost to premium product, they are increasing market share. It is not a long bow to draw to then assume that doing the opposite will have the opposite outcome.

Qantas has decided to compete by disengaging staff, reduce costs, put nothing in to the premium product and develop the low cost side of the business. Absolutely brilliant.
theheadmaster is offline  
Old 4th May 2012, 17:44
  #287 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Cloud cuckoo land
Posts: 107
Received 3 Likes on 1 Post
Rumour has it that virgin may be getting a significant number of 330s to do regional flying. Unlike Joyce who has never used his scientific training and run a simple test between his two airlines, think Hawaii. I'm sure JB would love to send his uncomplicated model there and put the cat amongst the pigeons! Better product than both and rip the guts out of their two brand model with one fell swoop. He must be sad that's he's doing this to QANTAS in a strange sort of way....
maggotdriver is offline  
Old 4th May 2012, 20:35
  #288 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 399
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Qantas delays A380s to save $400m

Friday May 4, 2012




Qantas is delaying delivery of two new Airbus A380 aircraft as it tries to save $400m.

Qantas will cut spending by a further $A400 million next financial year by delaying delivery of new A380 aircraft.
A review of the airline's maintenance operations had concluded, but a decision would not be announced until mid-May,
Qantas said in a statement released today.Qantas was to receive two new super jumbo A380s in early 2013, but will now take delivery of the aircraft in the 2016/17 financial year.
Another six A380s will be delivered to Qantas from 2018/19.
The changes will cut Qantas' capital expenditure by $400 million in 2012/13 to $1.9 billion.
The spending reductions follow a previously announced $500 million worth of cuts, which included staff cuts in its catering, cabin crew, pilots, engineering and ground operations.
Qantas has also been reviewing its maintenance operations to identify cost savings, which is likely to result in job losses.
Chief executive Alan Joyce has previously said keeping three maintenance sites - Melbourne, Avalon and Brisbane - was not viable.
Qantas also announced a big increase in capacity in its domestic business, as it fights to maintain at least 65 per cent market share.
"Our goal in the domestic market remains simple and consistent - we intend to retain the market share that enables us to maximise profit," Joyce said.
Qantas will step up competition against Virgin Australia by adding extra services during peak times on the busiest east coast business routes between Sydney, Melbourne and Brisbane.
It will also bring back Boeing 747s on its Sydney and Perth route, plus more Airbus A330s the Melbourne and Perth route.
That will increase the capacity on those east coast and west coast routes.
Jetstar will also increase its capacity, while QantasLink will increase capacity across Queensland.
More detail about new routes and timing will be announced at a later date, Qantas said.
slamer. is offline  
Old 5th May 2012, 01:31
  #289 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Outofoz
Posts: 718
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes on 7 Posts
Did someone mention leadership and trust?
Cookies must be enabled. | The Australian
hotnhigh is offline  
Old 5th May 2012, 02:11
  #290 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Wherever I can log on.
Posts: 1,872
Received 9 Likes on 7 Posts
It will also bring back Boeing 747s on its Sydney and Perth route, plus more Airbus A330s the Melbourne and Perth route.
With so many B747 airframes going to the Victorville parking lot this year, I wonder where the capacity for the Perth returns is coming from. Do we have to can yet another international route to get this capacity?

I just watched a show on Nat Geo about the construction of the B747-8I and I'm more convinced than ever that it is a far superior aircraft (for QF routes) than the A380. The best thing for Qantas to do now is to trade the A380's in on a fleet of B747-8's (supported by a fleet of B777-300ER's). It would make Qantas far more competitive and would give the aircraft market a big shake-up.
Going Boeing is online now  
Old 5th May 2012, 03:21
  #291 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: In the bone yard.
Posts: 207
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
@Going Boeing...

Heard a rumour that they'll be trading the A380's in on A320 Neo's for those MEL - PER & ADL - PER sectors.
UPPERLOBE is offline  
Old 5th May 2012, 04:18
  #292 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Skating away on the thin ice of a new day.
Posts: 1,116
Received 13 Likes on 8 Posts
I seriously doubt that rumour upperlobe. It would mean losing face over the "flagship" and these people would have to admit making an error. Something they will never acknowledge.

Going boeing your idea is great except it is based on the assumption they want Qantas to be competitive on the OS routes.
ampclamp is offline  
Old 5th May 2012, 04:18
  #293 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Exiled in the Ukraine
Posts: 269
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Wedcue said;
There will be Qantas painted 787's.

It will be operated by the same mob who operate Qantas painted 738's.

They are cheaper and AIPA failed to win the case in court to stop Qantas from operating in this way. 787's will never be flown by a mainline pilot (unless on LWOP).
INCORRECT.

The integration agreement will be scrapped in June as part of the arbitration which will allow the 787s to be operated both Internationally and Domestically under the short haul award by the surplus Mainline pilots.
Stalins ugly Brother is offline  
Old 5th May 2012, 04:57
  #294 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: AUS
Posts: 236
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
How does FWA "scrap" an agreement that is not being determined???
Tuner 2 is offline  
Old 5th May 2012, 05:29
  #295 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Wherever I can log on.
Posts: 1,872
Received 9 Likes on 7 Posts
which will allow the 787s to be operated both Internationally and Domestically under the short haul award by the surplus Mainline pilots.
Stalin, it appears that you think the SH award is superior to the LH award. There is one glaring problem with it - under the CAO48 Exemption that it operates under, the maximium TOD is 13 hours (irrespective of how many additional pilots are included in the crew). This would be very restrictive on an aircraft that is designed to have an 8000NM range (8500NM for the B787-9).
Going Boeing is online now  
Old 5th May 2012, 06:54
  #296 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Exiled in the Ukraine
Posts: 269
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Stalin, it appears that you think the SH award is superior to the LH award.
No I don't.

under the CAO48 Exemption that it operates under, the maximium TOD is 13 hours (irrespective of how many additional pilots are included in the crew). This would be very restrictive on an aircraft that is designed to have an 8000NM range (8500NM for the B787-9).
Why would you require the exemption when it clearly states the requirements for 3+ crew under CAO 48? The exemption applies to two man crew.

How does FWA "scrap" an agreement that is not being determined???
To clarify I should have said the removal of reference to the Integration award within the LHA. Read into what is being proposed and what has been removed from EBA7 rollover.

My thoughts. The company is happy for the 4 engine aircraft to remain on the LHA (or what is left of it after June). Then the A330 (earmarked for domestic ops in the future) ,787 (new type but earmarked int & dom ops) and 737 to be operated under the SHA (with applicable exemptions) to allow (perceived) flexibility to operate between the longhaul and shorthaul flying.
Management have a perception that the SHA is very efficient and comparative to our competitors, which is probably true.
Basically I think they only want to pay us stick hours, not MDC. As I said, JMHO.
Stalins ugly Brother is offline  
Old 5th May 2012, 08:32
  #297 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Sydney
Posts: 379
Likes: 0
Received 17 Likes on 5 Posts
Yep, the biggest, gaping, festering hole in that short haul award is no minimum daily credit.

Last edited by theheadmaster; 5th May 2012 at 14:27.
theheadmaster is offline  
Old 5th May 2012, 13:21
  #298 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 405
Likes: 0
Received 38 Likes on 11 Posts
Under 48E, augmented crew can go to 22hrs TOD with a bunk, 16hrs with a screened seat from cabin and 14hrs with a seat in the cabin.
The The is offline  
Old 5th May 2012, 14:30
  #299 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Australia
Posts: 23
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The Headmaster, Have you or are you working under the SHA??
QFdude is offline  
Old 6th May 2012, 00:20
  #300 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Wherever I can log on.
Posts: 1,872
Received 9 Likes on 7 Posts
Under 48E, augmented crew can go to 22hrs TOD with a bunk, 16hrs with a screened seat from cabin and 14hrs with a seat in the cabin.
Have the rules changed for the SH Award (& the CAO48 exemption that they work under) as when the A330 was originally operating under the SH award, an A330 operating NRT-PER diverted to Learmonth for fuel (due PER Wx) and the crew were unable to then operate the next sector to PER due to exceeding 13 hours TOD despite having a 3 pilot crew? Under the LH award, they would have been able to continue.
Going Boeing is online now  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.