Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > PPRuNe Worldwide > Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific
Reload this Page >

Air Mauritius A340 MEL-PER return to YMML

Wikiposts
Search
Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific Airline and RPT Rumours & News in Australia, enZed and the Pacific

Air Mauritius A340 MEL-PER return to YMML

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 23rd May 2012, 06:37
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 704
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Air Mauritius A340 MEL-PER return to YMML

Air Mauritius confirm to Rafael Epstein on ABC RAdio Melbourne 774 that a "suspicious item" was found on board the A340 en route to Perth from Melbourne
What was it? A dodgy item from catering?
VH-Cheer Up is offline  
Old 23rd May 2012, 06:52
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Australia
Posts: 308
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Uncle Bruce and a load of export cosmetics?
Captain Gidday is offline  
Old 23rd May 2012, 07:13
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Oz
Age: 68
Posts: 1,913
Received 295 Likes on 124 Posts
Bomb threat. Landed R34 1458.

Noticed it tracked down R27 after arrival.
PoppaJo is offline  
Old 23rd May 2012, 07:34
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: WA
Posts: 1,290
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Persons with real intent do not make threats. But this sort of event allows the govt justify screwing us over.
YPJT is offline  
Old 23rd May 2012, 07:50
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Sunny side up
Posts: 1,206
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
You have to admit that it's a st act though. I have a real hatred for grotty little bullies who turn up at the airport or get on an aircraft and start throwing their weight around making threats and scaring fellow passengers, even though they're 99.999% likely to be BS.

Maybe a reintroduction of the stocks might be an effective deterrent, they could be placed within tomato throwing range of the security screening queue. There could be a special set for Dirty Harry wannabes from the OTS...

Last edited by Worrals in the wilds; 23rd May 2012 at 07:54.
Worrals in the wilds is offline  
Old 23rd May 2012, 08:14
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Brisbane
Age: 59
Posts: 229
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Bit of a worry, they seem to have parked it over the western side of the airport, near the Airservices compound. I start working there on Monday

I have an image of someone in the tower saying, "You want to park it where!?"
stevep64 is offline  
Old 23rd May 2012, 08:31
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: WA
Posts: 1,290
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Yeah Warrals, people like this should be publicly humiliated and punished to the max. Not because they are a threat to aviation security but purely because they are too stupid to be allowed anywhere near an aircraft much less travel on one.
YPJT is offline  
Old 23rd May 2012, 09:30
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Sunny side up
Posts: 1,206
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
We're lucky in aviation.
Employees in most industries that deal with Bulk Public have to listen to endless abusive complaints, threats of violence and tantrums from a minority of members of the public and smile sweetly while they are verbally and sometimes physically abused.

Modern business practice calls it 'customer service skills'. Apparently it's unacceptable for staff to call wits wits. A bit un PC, because it's not their fault they're wits. As children they were once denied a second helping of icecream, so they're irretrievably scarred for life and we all need to Understand them. Meanwhile all the decent people in the queue fidget nervously and hope they won't have to either 1. wait too long or 2. cop a spray from the 'disadvantaged' bullying brat.

In aviation, when some douchebag fronts up full of self entitlement, rum and bad manners and starts throwing their weight around making threats, we're allowed to punt them off to the AFP as a security threat. Are they a security threat? Probably not, but let's cherish the oportunity.

Are they a selfish, bullying bastard who shouldn't be let loose in public, let alone on an aircraft where the crew can't just throw them out the door when they turn feral midflight (more's the pity )? Absolutely.

Machiavelli: whatever works.

Last edited by Worrals in the wilds; 23rd May 2012 at 09:31.
Worrals in the wilds is offline  
Old 23rd May 2012, 10:15
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: in the classroom of life
Age: 55
Posts: 6,864
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
And anybody see this one?

Trans-Atlantic flight diverted to Maine airport after passenger claims implanted device - The Washington Post

They should have had me as the Captain, down to 10,000' and depressurise....open door and push the b!tch out!

Morons in future would think twice about such stupid stunts!
Jabawocky is offline  
Old 23rd May 2012, 10:35
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Brisbane
Age: 59
Posts: 229
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Gotta love the reporting on the Mauritius story. A fully loaded A340 with 180 people on board. I don't know much about A340s, but figure it would be a big plane and would do at least 30 seconds of research before using the phrase "fully loaded".

Pissed off because there's no way of leaving comments on the story
stevep64 is offline  
Old 23rd May 2012, 10:54
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: YMML
Posts: 25
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by stevep64
Bit of a worry, they seem to have parked it over the western side of the airport, near the Airservices compound. I start working there on Monday I have an image of someone in the tower saying, "You want to park it where!?"
You're worried??? I was at the centre! The bomb-parking area is actually a decent distance away so you have nothing to worry about. But we get an awesome view from the back of the learning academy. Atleast it kept us occupied during a slow afternoon, watching emergency services running back & forth. The reason why they taxi'd down 27 after landing was because they obviously had to close the runway that the plane was parked at, and there was such a massive wind that 27 was useless anyway. And grats on the job Steve. I'll probably see you on Monday
In_Transit is offline  
Old 23rd May 2012, 10:57
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Perth
Posts: 291
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The passenger in question threatened another passenger who told the cabin crew that he had a bomb surgically implanted in his stomach, left side to be exact
falconx is offline  
Old 23rd May 2012, 11:09
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: 41,000'
Posts: 279
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Same story as when 777's or 330's get called jumbos!.....ahhh no!!!
piston broke again is offline  
Old 23rd May 2012, 11:24
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Perth
Posts: 291
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Just reviewing audio tapes, crew state a swepps bottle found in the rear galley with BOMB written on it, relocated that bottle to the 4th rear right door.
falconx is offline  
Old 23rd May 2012, 11:37
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Melbourne
Age: 56
Posts: 21
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
mmmm there is some rat odour here

was there an exercise by the dog squad or customs or aviation security today? just saying....
derab is offline  
Old 23rd May 2012, 12:15
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: FNQ ... It's Permanent!
Posts: 4,290
Received 169 Likes on 86 Posts
was there an exercise by the dog squad or customs or aviation security today? just saying....
You moron! You think people do this for fun? Get a life!
Capt Fathom is offline  
Old 23rd May 2012, 14:34
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Australia
Posts: 51
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
A340 with 180 people on board ... using the phrase "fully loaded".
You obviously haven't seen the typical MK passengers luggage. Expect to see 5 Plasma TV's, 3 lawn mowers, 1 motor bike, 2 bbq's, 1 kitchen sink, aisle 13 from Bunnings, and aisle 7 from Coles. And that's just the carry-on.
fallen is offline  
Old 23rd May 2012, 18:57
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Planet Earth
Posts: 38
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Hope the powers to be will be taking fingerprints on the item that was found, as lately we have security audits on airlines were the security personel plant items on the plane, and then rate the airline accordingly......LHR is a classic example
TSHEKUDU is offline  
Old 23rd May 2012, 21:44
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Melbourne
Age: 56
Posts: 21
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Quote:
was there an exercise by the dog squad or customs or aviation security today? just saying....
You moron! You think people do this for fun? Get a life!
Capt. I am just saying that you should never assume malicious intent when a good old fashioned Fk up will explain the situation, especially when AVSEC is involved.
Of course no-one would intentionally leave a training decoy on the plane after a dog training exercise, but when a foreign object turns up in the galley just after departure, it's one of the most likely scenarios that spring to mind.
if this bottle ends up having traces of ammonium nitrate on the label and the training room is missing a prop, then the puzzle will be solved.
derab is offline  
Old 23rd May 2012, 22:23
  #20 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: FNQ ... It's Permanent!
Posts: 4,290
Received 169 Likes on 86 Posts
Sorry. Moron was a bit harsh! My apologies.

Your scenario, whilst possible, is way out there. It would involve a lot of people not doing their job.

More that likely, the person that did this will be on board again today.
Capt Fathom is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.