PPRuNe Forums

Go Back   PPRuNe Forums > PPRuNe Worldwide > Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific
Forgotten your Username/Password?


Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific Airline and RPT Rumours & News in Australia, enZed and the Pacific


Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 12th Jan 2012, 18:38   #1 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Auckland
Age: 41
Posts: 38
JetConnect Maths

I normally take any comments on dodgy internal pricing within the Qantas Group with a grain of salt figuring that for every such occurrence there should be a middle manager looking at his monthly reports going WTF why should I have to wear that, however I was intrigued by this article today ...

Quote:
...

Accounts filed to the Companies Office just before Christmas show Qantas's New Zealand subsidiary, Jetconnect, reported a profit of $11.3 million for the year to June 30, almost unchanged on the previous year. It posted revenue of $77.7m, compared with $78.3m previously.
...
The latest government figures show Air New Zealand's seat utilisation on the route averaged almost 84 per cent in October, Qantas's 77 per cent, Virgin's 74 per cent and Jetstar's 73 per cent.

...
Trans-Tasman flight war set to heat up - Qantas | Stuff.co.nz

So doing some back of the envelope maths...

JetConnect has revenue of $77.7m per year,
divide by 365 gives $212,876 per day
divide by 26 flights a day gives $8187 per flight
divide by .77 of 168 seats gives $63.28 revenue per passenger per flight

I haven't included any Cargo Revenue, or charges for JetConnect cabin crew operating services in the wider Qantas network but I figure they wouldn't adjust the number by more than 20%.

I made 20 or so trans-tasman flights during the year and I didn't pay anywhere near $63.28 on any of them!!!

So what is this saying, Qantas books the full amount of the sale fare revenue, looks at what expenses it wants JetConnect to pay (presumably labour costs and other expenses incurred in NZD), adds a margin of 16% (77m revenue->11.3m profit), and passes that amount to JetConnect as its "revenue", and records it as an expense in the Qantas books. That amount being approximately $63.28 per passenger per flight!.

At the end of the year, JetConnect has $11m in its bank a/c (if it has one yet), of which it then pays 3m in tax to the NZ government (I bet it doesn't), and $8m back to the parent as a dividend.

Am I missing something?
reubee is offline   Reply
Old 12th Jan 2012, 19:32   #2 (permalink)
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Doing a pre flight inspection
Posts: 254
Thats unlike you to be bagging QF You keep telling me how great it is their flights are full etc....................or have you seen the light
VBPCGUY is offline   Reply
Old 12th Jan 2012, 20:49   #3 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: sydney
Age: 46
Posts: 1,267
Wouldn't it be more likely that they pay Jetconnect $8000 per flight to crew their flights and thats it? Thats the Jetconnect revenue right there, nothing to do with operating an airline or how much QF charged for the tickets or paid for the fuel.
Correct me if I'm wrong, thats just how I imagine a crewing company being reimbersed.
framer is offline   Reply
Old 13th Jan 2012, 06:06   #4 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: AKL
Age: 23
Posts: 83
Jet Connect and finances just don't work out.

Quote:
That amount being approximately $63.28 per passenger per flight!.
While Qantas didn't go that low, I did pay $69 AKL-MEL on NZ last year
cavemanzk is offline   Reply
Old 14th Jan 2012, 10:01   #5 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Auckland
Age: 41
Posts: 38
Doh, NZ Company Accounts are on-line http://www.business.govt.nz/companie...9C582D949D4A7C

Manpower and staff related expenditure 37,077,122
Aircraft operating variable 23,932,877

Divide by 365 (days) x 26 (flights a day) to work out the charge per flight.

Other interesting thing from the report, 149m current assets, 8m current liabilities.
reubee is offline   Reply
Old 14th Jan 2012, 20:45   #6 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: S.O.E.
Posts: 75
2 + 2 = 5

Simple
Dale Hardale is offline   Reply
 
 
This ad will disappear if you login
Reply
 


Thread Tools


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT. The time now is 08:45.


vBulletin® v3.8.7, Copyright ©2000-2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
SEO by vBSEO 3.6.1
© 1996-2012 The Professional Pilots Rumour Network

As these are anonymous forums the origins of the contributions may be opposite to what may be apparent. In fact the press may use it, or the unscrupulous, or sciolists*, to elicit certain reactions.

*"sciolist"... Noun, archaic. "a person who pretends to be knowledgeable and well informed".