Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > PPRuNe Worldwide > Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific
Reload this Page >

Virgin Australia Long Haul International EBA is up!!

Wikiposts
Search
Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific Airline and RPT Rumours & News in Australia, enZed and the Pacific

Virgin Australia Long Haul International EBA is up!!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 5th Oct 2016, 09:55
  #101 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Sydney
Posts: 77
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Berealgetreal,

Perhaps you should take a page out of your own book.

1. 787's are nice but VA has 777's and A330's. Soon to be replaced with either 787's or A350's. So what's your point here?
2. Staff/Duty travel has been mentioned a number of times. Do you normally select an employer based on that? I hope not. For clarification VA get business class travel internationally on VA and Etihad and also $1000 of free travel with the ability to hand buddy sectors to anyone.
3. Progression into mainline? Are you still falling for those nice little EOI's they keep sending you to make you think you have a better chance than external applicants? With no combined seniority list and a pilot shortage across all subsidiary's do you really think they will cripple themselves by allowing "progression"? Group pilots are currently being held back whilst external applications are just about to start.
4. Profits in the group are exceptional. No one is arguing that. I still remember the pay freeze everyone served and the 5000 job cuts that got them there.
5. LWOP and secondments have been offered at VA in the past. So no difference there.

Can't seem to find the Jetstar hiring page anywhere either?

There is simply more pay, more time off and more interesting flying at VA with guaranteed progression on a combined seniority list.

Oh and I almost forgot to mention the most important part. The girls are better looking...
skysook is offline  
Old 5th Oct 2016, 10:56
  #102 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: 3rd rock from the sun
Posts: 2,468
Received 310 Likes on 116 Posts
Originally Posted by skysook
Oh and I almost forgot to mention the most important part. The girls are better looking...
Ohh really, that's your priorities

I think you're wrong anyway, Jetstar might be overtaking VA with that. But really, who cares
morno is online now  
Old 5th Oct 2016, 11:06
  #103 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Doomagee
Age: 11
Posts: 721
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Ok, no worries.
Berealgetreal is offline  
Old 5th Oct 2016, 18:49
  #104 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Sydney
Posts: 77
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Clearly it's not morno. But thanks for taking the bait!
skysook is offline  
Old 10th Oct 2016, 08:02
  #105 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2016
Location: Australia
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
OK, We all realise everyone is entitled to an opinion included QF and VANZ guys.
But let's get back on topic unless we get triple digits in the first year of this proposed WB EBA good luck getting it voted up. All the BS aside we will not accept being payed less than an FA
Our starting price given we are working on a well expired EBA is triple digits, I'm now stuck in the system and below VARA proper money for SOs has to be on the agenda.
Bluewhine is offline  
Old 10th Oct 2016, 08:41
  #106 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Australia
Posts: 751
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
99% of the line pilots have no idea how the company is really run. But then, sometimes it is better off not to know !
I'm pretty sure they do!
The Bullwinkle is offline  
Old 12th Oct 2016, 05:42
  #107 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2016
Location: Sydney
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
LWOP is being offered to those 777 right seat drivers earning left seat wages. S/o's need to push for this pay rise as support from the front two seats will be mostly non existent.

Most F/O's are now getting Command bypass pay, the company knew for a long time that as of June 2016 they'd be getting it, so had plenty of time to save the $$$$.

F/O bypass pay is no excuse to deny S/O's of a much needed and much overdue pay rise.
Barry_Crocker is offline  
Old 12th Oct 2016, 11:38
  #108 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Land of Oz
Posts: 306
Received 30 Likes on 13 Posts
Hey Bazza
I heard that there was only 4 on bypass pay. Can you confirm the exact number. I would be interested to know. Thanks.
No Idea Either is online now  
Old 12th Oct 2016, 23:36
  #109 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Australia
Posts: 316
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
S/o's need to push for this pay rise as support from the front two seats will be mostly non existent.
Aren't SO's 60% of the 777 pilot group? It's a shame it's not a long haul EBA again, as your vote would carry the day. But I guess with the 330 voting for the 'widebody' EBA you are up against front seaters with no real concern for SO T&C's.
Falling Leaf is offline  
Old 13th Oct 2016, 03:52
  #110 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2016
Location: Sydney
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
No Idea Either.... No I can't confirm exact number, however I can confirm it's a lot lot lot more than 4.


Falling Leaf.... Spot on!
Barry_Crocker is offline  
Old 13th Oct 2016, 05:00
  #111 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Oz
Posts: 548
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by Falling Leaf
Aren't SO's 60% of the 777 pilot group? It's a shame it's not a long haul EBA again, as your vote would carry the day. But I guess with the 330 voting for the 'widebody' EBA you are up against front seaters with no real concern for SO T&C's.
True, it didn't help when they got booted down the Group Date of Joining list back in the last EBA offering. S.O's are a group that both the company and other pilots love to marginalise it seems. I wish them the best, but I don't see any real gains as achievable.
DUXNUTZ is offline  
Old 13th Oct 2016, 12:52
  #112 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Adelaide
Posts: 606
Received 13 Likes on 3 Posts
How did they "get booted down the GDOJ"?

This isn't my recollection
Snakecharma is offline  
Old 13th Oct 2016, 13:23
  #113 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Oz
Posts: 548
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by Snakecharma
How did they "get booted down the GDOJ"?

This isn't my recollection
Command priority date.
DUXNUTZ is offline  
Old 13th Oct 2016, 21:44
  #114 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Posts: 134
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Approx two thirds of the original B777 FOs on command pay.
Jet Man is offline  
Old 14th Oct 2016, 08:29
  #115 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Sydney
Posts: 82
Received 10 Likes on 5 Posts
Command priority date was justified.

What wasn't justified was a group of pilots negotiating their place on a seniority list that wasn't theirs!!! Or if you don't want to look at it that way, it wasn't justified that the wide body EBA alone (and hence the wide body pilots) were able to negotiate how the lists would be joined. The short haul pilots had zero input into the wide body negotiations that secured a massive win for the CRZFO's.

Under the deal that they had originally signed up to, prior to that new EBA coming in, they (CRZFO's) were always going to have to basically quit V and start at the bottom of the domestic seniority list when moving to the right seat. What they got at least is priority on wide body right seats in the future.

There were a lot of guys who decided to not apply for the CRZFO gig because the T&C's were so ****. Joined the short haul under the knowledge that any CRZFO's coming from the wide body would start at the bottom below them, only to have that EBA come in and the goal posts change.

In reality the company is to blame for the most part, and to a lesser degree the unions. Company should never have set it up a separate entity only to join it later . And the unions should not have allowed that to be put into the wide body EBA without at least a survey to the short haul guys as they were also going to be directly impacted by it too!

Always two sides to the story.
Biatch is offline  
Old 14th Oct 2016, 09:50
  #116 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Bolivia
Posts: 434
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I like your style Biatch, never let facts get in the way of blaming everyone else for something you don't understand.

Facts

              So in short.
              The Company was entirely to blame.
              The industrial instruments worked exactly as they should have. LH pilots voted on their document without any interference from SH pilots. SH pilots addressed perceived issues in their document without any interference from LH pilots.
              End result that nobody particularly happy, which in general usually means about the right outcome.

              If you're not happy with the way your union is representing you, get of the couch and onto a committee and have a real say rather than criticising those who give up their own time and work tirelessly for nothing, for your benefit.
              Vorsicht is offline  
              Old 14th Oct 2016, 12:53
                #117 (permalink)  
               
              Join Date: May 2004
              Location: Oz
              Posts: 548
              Likes: 0
              Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
              Originally Posted by Biatch
              Command priority date was justified.

              What wasn't justified was a group of pilots negotiating their place on a seniority list that wasn't theirs!!! Or if you don't want to look at it that way, it wasn't justified that the wide body EBA alone (and hence the wide body pilots) were able to negotiate how the lists would be joined. The short haul pilots had zero input into the wide body negotiations that secured a massive win for the CRZFO's.

              Under the deal that they had originally signed up to, prior to that new EBA coming in, they (CRZFO's) were always going to have to basically quit V and start at the bottom of the domestic seniority list when moving to the right seat. What they got at least is priority on wide body right seats in the future.

              There were a lot of guys who decided to not apply for the CRZFO gig because the T&C's were so ****. Joined the short haul under the knowledge that any CRZFO's coming from the wide body would start at the bottom below them, only to have that EBA come in and the goal posts change.

              In reality the company is to blame for the most part, and to a lesser degree the unions. Company should never have set it up a separate entity only to join it later . And the unions should not have allowed that to be put into the wide body EBA without at least a survey to the short haul guys as they were also going to be directly impacted by it too!

              Always two sides to the story.
              So the practical bottom of the list (behind every short haul pilot hired behind them) wasn't good enough for you? I enjoy the contemp that's still evident for present and past CRFO's/SO's, but with every year that passes there's more to help guide any future EBA negotiations.

              Last edited by DUXNUTZ; 14th Oct 2016 at 13:38.
              DUXNUTZ is offline  
              Old 14th Oct 2016, 20:39
                #118 (permalink)  
               
              Join Date: Oct 1999
              Posts: 134
              Likes: 0
              Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
              Good post Vorsicht. That's pretty much how it went down.
              Jet Man is offline  
              Old 14th Oct 2016, 21:29
                #119 (permalink)  
               
              Join Date: Sep 2012
              Location: Adelaide
              Posts: 606
              Received 13 Likes on 3 Posts
              Whichever way a merge/joining/welding/smashing or whatever else you want to call it of seniority lists is carried out it will always end in some group or another being disadvantaged.

              There is no way of keeping everyone happy!

              The guys in the right hand seat of the domestic jets, who had no say in the long haul EBA felt that their ability to move to command was being compromised by the inclusion of the cruisers, the cruisers thought they were being shafted, the long haul fo's who thought they would get long haul commands were upset because the upstarts from domestic took their commands, the 330 pilots were upset because the first vote got defeated, in part because of the seniority list stuff, and it cost some of them more than 25 k in lost back pay.

              No one group is entirely happy and no one group is out to shaft the others, compromise is the name of the game and the unfortunate thing is that realpolitik is alive and well. Many cruisers are able to move out of the back seat into a window seat because of advantageous clauses in relation to freeze periods that do not apply to any other work group so it is swings and roundabouts..

              But the thing to remember is that we are all one pilot group and sitting there taking pot shots at each other is a waste of effort and just breeds unhappiness.
              Snakecharma is offline  
              Old 16th Oct 2016, 11:08
                #120 (permalink)  
               
              Join Date: Oct 2016
              Location: Brisbane
              Posts: 10
              Likes: 0
              Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
              I just stumbled onto this thread. With regards to the EBA, how to we get the cabin crew unions fight for the CRFO's ?

              FUSO
              FedupSo is offline  


              Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

              Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.