Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > PPRuNe Worldwide > Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific
Reload this Page >

Jetstar to launch Hong Kong based carrier

Wikiposts
Search
Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific Airline and RPT Rumours & News in Australia, enZed and the Pacific

Jetstar to launch Hong Kong based carrier

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 27th Mar 2012, 06:41
  #81 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Stuck in the middle...
Posts: 1,638
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Hopefully Jetstar can get a fair share of the growth in Asia.
Indeed. But it may not be so simple.


You people astound me by wanting an Australian airline to fail.
That's just the point. I'd suggest there are very few on these boards who want an Australian airline to fail. Quite the opposite, in fact.
Taildragger67 is offline  
Old 27th Mar 2012, 07:05
  #82 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: FL290
Posts: 763
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Why would China Eastern need/want some pathetic little upstart of an airline like Orangestar?
1a sound asleep is offline  
Old 27th Mar 2012, 07:21
  #83 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Roguesville, cloud cuckooland
Posts: 1,197
Likes: 0
Received 16 Likes on 5 Posts
LMFAO, you lost all your credibility when you confidently predicted QF would buy Strategic to fly the 787.

Troll.
Capt Kremin is offline  
Old 27th Mar 2012, 07:47
  #84 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Australia
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Might add that pilots will need to pay full Oz tax, as the Oz ATO works on the residence idea, not where you sleep or work, 23AG is dead. And the HK IRD works on the where the company is controlled idea. An airline cannot fly internationally out of HKG unless it is controlled from HKG, the 51% ownership rule (like Oz and SIN) does not apply in HKG.
What has the Australian tax laws and the Oz ATO got to do with it?

Australian arrogance never surprises me. Just because it is Jetstar, why does it have anything to do with Australian tax laws? Do you automatically assume the pilots employed will be Australian? Not Canadian? NZ? Samoan? Unemployed bum?

Are you trying to say that if a Canadian is employed he will be subject to Aus tax laws as that is where (we presume) the airline is controlled. Get your hand off it!

BTW, since Jetstar Fltops department and 80% of it's Check Pilots are Ex Ansett it will be interesting that eventually these guys will be controlling QF. Based on the predictions that Jetstar will expand at the expense of QF. Not my words just the comments made in this thread and others.

Cheers!
stillgoing is offline  
Old 27th Mar 2012, 09:36
  #85 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Sydney
Posts: 298
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Orangestar went broke.....bought out by Newstar...........
busdriver007 is offline  
Old 27th Mar 2012, 09:51
  #86 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Dark Side of the Moon
Posts: 1,433
Received 207 Likes on 69 Posts
Yea woop woop, lets hope that this brings Jetstar down and that the bang on effect will be for Qantas to go down the drain as well. Then we will all get what we want...... we will all be out of work

Ollie
Ollie Onion is online now  
Old 27th Mar 2012, 09:53
  #87 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,188
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I seem to recall SQ airlines wanted equity in China Eastern Airlines (CEA)

Then along came CX, with a higher bid for that same equity.

CEA shareholders (if my memory services me correctly) scuttled the deal as not being in the interest of China Eastern.

BB reckons he's going to take airline management expertise up to Hong Kong.

The arrogance of this mob is unbelievable.
Mstr Caution is offline  
Old 27th Mar 2012, 09:55
  #88 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Dark Side of the Moon
Posts: 1,433
Received 207 Likes on 69 Posts
Wink

"the arrogance of these people is unbelievable"

Well he is Australian!
Ollie Onion is online now  
Old 27th Mar 2012, 09:58
  #89 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,188
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Why would China Eastern need/want some pathetic little upstart of an airline like Orangestar?
1A - They wanna know what Boston Bruce's plans for a low cost carrier are for HKG, so they can then pull out of the deal with that IP.
Mstr Caution is offline  
Old 27th Mar 2012, 10:10
  #90 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Bottom of the Harbour
Posts: 417
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 2 Posts
The ownership of Dragonair prior to the CX takeover was 38% CNAC and 28% CITIC, both of these companies were mainland owned and Hong Kong based.

China Eastern will be setting up a holding company that is no doubt based in Hong Kong which will meet the basic law requirements. HNA group has done exactly the same with Hong Kong Airlines.

The Basic Law was written to ensure that mainland chinese companies would not be disadvantaged.

A foreign firm without Hong Kong or mainland Chinese investment would have no chance, but Joyce has secured China Eastern. Their biggest shareholder is the Chinese government.
KABOY is offline  
Old 27th Mar 2012, 11:18
  #91 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: southeast asia
Posts: 67
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Gnadnberg and crew, not sure where you re getting your info re JQ Asia(read Singapore), but the guys are doing very well. Bringing home a very good salary, and so far from what I have heard is EBA guys are queuing up to get onboard!!
20000+k a month is not bad for 15 days work in anyone's language!!!
I also agree that JQ japan will do very well, but HKG???? Who knows......
Good luck to the QF guys still hanging in there, I think you are going to have an interesting few yrs ahead of you....
pigdriver is offline  
Old 27th Mar 2012, 11:24
  #92 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Eden Valley
Posts: 2,153
Received 92 Likes on 41 Posts
Is that 20K AUD?
Gnadenburg is offline  
Old 27th Mar 2012, 11:27
  #93 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Heaven
Posts: 584
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Franchises and Repatriated Profit

Jetstar is a franchise with minority holdings in each of it ventures.
The majority of the profit goes to the majority shareholder.
How will the profit aportioned to Jetstar find its way back to the Qantas group.?
Most if not all countries heavily tax repatriated profit. Particularly Asian economic jurisdictions.
Surely the time effort and money poured into these ventures would be better directed to improving and growing the Qantas mainline entity.
The duplication of costs for example seems to be either poorly thought out or ill considered.
DEFCON4 is offline  
Old 27th Mar 2012, 11:33
  #94 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Somewhere
Posts: 3,071
Received 138 Likes on 63 Posts
the guys are doing very well. Bringing home a very good salary, and so far from what I have heard is EBA guys are queuing up to get onboard!! 20000+k a month is not bad for 15 days work in anyone's language!!
That's a rather misleading statement as living as a non citizen anywhere in the world is expensive.

I would suggest that 240K in Singapore wouldn't leave alot left over if you had 2-3 kids. Remember you are paying full fare for schooling/health. Rent is expensive, cost of living is expensive. Don't get me wrong 240k is reasonable but you won't be living large by any stretch of the imagination.

Why do you think Emirates offer schooling/health/accommodation as part of their package?

Same goes for Jetstar HKG. As a small airline there won't to many problems. However if it is successful and grows I don't know how they will crew it. You can't cut corners on expat salaries and the cost of training local Chinese crews would be prohibitive.

Jetstar Australia get free pilots that ain't going to happen in Asia if you want a big airline.
neville_nobody is offline  
Old 27th Mar 2012, 11:35
  #95 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Stuck in the middle...
Posts: 1,638
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Is that 20K AUD?
Even if it's SGD, if they're on local (SG) contracts then factor in the lower tax rate and you're not doing too badly; probably more in hand than someone getting the same number in AU. It's all paid gross (tax is paid in the following year, by the taxpayer) with no super / pension deduction (if you're not a citizen or permanent resident).

NN is correct, a foreigner does then have to make their own arrangements for health cover, schools, pension etc. and cars are excruciatingly expensive, but SGD 240k / year can buy you a fairly reasonable lifestyle in SIN city.

Put it this way, a single-earner household in Sydney can find it tough on AUD 240k / year, after the mortgage, car and kids; same in Sing. You probably wouldn't be far ahead, but you probably wouldn't be too far behind, either.
Taildragger67 is offline  
Old 27th Mar 2012, 21:12
  #96 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: moon
Posts: 3,564
Received 89 Likes on 32 Posts
Defcon4's comment is on the money. There is nothing for the Qantas shareholder in any of these deals.

There is everything for the Board and Management because:

1. On the surface, these ventures look attractive "Huge Asian Markets" etc.

2. The Board and management are going to "look very busy" implementing this strategy. There will be lots of important trips and meetings...and photo opportunities. I once had a group general manager colleague who excelled at this, his presentations were impeccable, his meetings and organisation charts were superb, but...

3. There is a need to generate a financial return in cash to Qantas shareholders from all this activity. That is the presentation slide I would want to see.....But I guess I'm old fashioned - show me the money.
Sunfish is offline  
Old 27th Mar 2012, 21:44
  #97 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Sandpit
Posts: 74
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Stillgoing is spot on!

Australian arrogance never surprises me. Just because it is Jetstar, why does it have anything to do with Australian tax laws? Do you automatically assume the pilots employed will be Australian? Not Canadian? NZ? Samoan? Unemployed bum?

Are you trying to say that if a Canadian is employed he will be subject to Aus tax laws as that is where (we presume) the airline is controlled. Get your hand off it!
With pilot cadet training courses now flourishing with Chinese based airlines and a lot of that training being done by Australians in Oz at places like Oxford and FTA, it makes sense that the budget workforce will come from China Eastern, with the aircraft and branding from Jetstar.

Growth in Hong Kong will occur at the expense of one (or more) of the other established Jetstar franchises.
It will obviously all be under local terms and conditions, placing pressure on the other businesses to lower their labour costs. Welcome to the D-scale!

The ATO will not see any tax revenue, because as a group company, the books will be manipulated to ensure the loss is transferred to the necessary entity. So Australians are yet again training themselves out of a job, and helping out another country!
The Guru is offline  
Old 27th Mar 2012, 23:09
  #98 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 356
Received 115 Likes on 46 Posts
The ATO will not see any tax revenue, as a group company, the books will be manipulated to ensure the loss is transferred to the necessary entity.
It's not just the ATO that will miss out.

Last edited by C441; 28th Mar 2012 at 01:38.
C441 is offline  
Old 27th Mar 2012, 23:20
  #99 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Classified
Posts: 123
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From a friend: some excepts from the HK press:

Jetstar Hong Kong faces bumpy take-off
Various

Extensive media coverage on the MOU signed between Qantas and China Eastern on setting up a HK-based LCC Jetstar HK. China Eastern chairman Liu Shaoyong expects the carrier to take up five million passengers by 2015, equivalent to 6% to 7% market share, and generate a profit from 2016, the concerns of “principal place of business” of the planned carried was raised by SCMP and Ming Pao.

Aviation experts say Jetstar HK may encounter problems in regulatory and licensing issues. One issue is whether it can be designated as a HK carrier by the Government.

They said it was difficult to see how Jetstar HK could qualify as having its principal place of business in the territory if there was no decision-making in Hong Kong.

Countries which had air services agreements with HK could deny the new carrier landing rights if they felt it’s not a truly HKG airline. Jetstar HK is also expected to face opposition from incumbent carriers seeking to block or delay its air transport licensing application.

The HK Government was quoted saying that “new operators need to bring competition into the HK market and offer more choices to the consumers”.
I guess you know who "aviation experts" are - the Airline Planning depts of CX-KA and HX

Last edited by D.Lamination; 27th Mar 2012 at 23:33.
D.Lamination is offline  
Old 28th Mar 2012, 01:23
  #100 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: 41,000'
Posts: 279
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Surely if this expedition Joyce and his motley crue are on falters, he'll have a pretty big target on his back...I'm surprised they have let him get this far after the MAS fiasco.
piston broke again is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.