PPRuNe Forums

Go Back   PPRuNe Forums > PPRuNe Worldwide > Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific
Forgotten your Username/Password?


Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific Airline and RPT Rumours & News in Australia, enZed and the Pacific


Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 10th Jul 2012, 03:40   #321 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: The Bilge
Age: 3
Posts: 315
Keg said,

Normasars, I never said QF drivers were 'smarter and better' so you can take that straw man and burn it to your heart's content. My point (and I'll make it again) is that there is an inconsistency between what J* state they do and their actions

Keg, can you please explain to me where I made that assumption or said those words. I was aiming that at QF Group pilots, not one particular segment. You may be confusing me with someone else.

Last edited by Normasars; 10th Jul 2012 at 03:42.
Normasars is offline   Reply
Old 10th Jul 2012, 04:17   #322 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Asia
Age: 31
Posts: 69
Unfortunately, a top score on a QF psych test these days still leaves you with about as much chance as Buckley!
Gligg is offline   Reply
Old 10th Jul 2012, 09:44   #323 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: SYDNEY
Posts: 19
Keg,

From a mate that was involved in recruitment, the reason they changed the assessment criteria was to keep the bad apples out. To test it, they fed the data from the pilots they were unhappy with into the new system and they all got rejected.

Not sure if they "lowered" anything......
chickendrummer is offline   Reply
 
 
This ad will disappear if you login
Reply
 


Thread Tools


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT. The time now is 12:04.


vBulletin® v3.8.7, Copyright ©2000-2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
SEO by vBSEO 3.6.1
© 1996-2012 The Professional Pilots Rumour Network

As these are anonymous forums the origins of the contributions may be opposite to what may be apparent. In fact the press may use it, or the unscrupulous, or sciolists*, to elicit certain reactions.

*"sciolist"... Noun, archaic. "a person who pretends to be knowledgeable and well informed".