PPRuNe Forums

Go Back   PPRuNe Forums > PPRuNe Worldwide > Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific
Forgotten your Username/Password?


Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific Airline and RPT Rumours & News in Australia, enZed and the Pacific


Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 27th Oct 2008, 05:32   #1 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Sydney
Posts: 71
Big changes to IFR routes in WA

Just got the new DAP amendments and next issue charts and noticed that there are some big changes happening all over WA. Biggest changes around Perth, most SIDs and STARs have changed due to all the waypoints moving and also changing names. There is also a large increase in one way routes and many old favorites have completely disappeared.

Should make for some interesting times as crews try to catch up with the new procedures and even more interesting times for those operators that aren't so good at keeping RNAV databases up to date.

I assume this is in response to the reported delays and airspace issues that we keep hearing about.

I guess it’s a bit early but can the crews in WA keep us posted how this one works out and if it helps or makes things worse.

Cheers,
W&F
White and Fluffy is offline   Reply
Old 27th Oct 2008, 05:55   #2 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: FNQ ... Still!
Posts: 2,068
An AIC regarding this has been on the Airservices website for some time!
Capt Fathom is offline   Reply
Old 27th Oct 2008, 06:20   #4 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: back to the land of small pay and big bills
Age: 39
Posts: 717
Thats funny..we have huge changes in NZ too. Heaps of new RNAV waypoints and new routes around the middle of the Nth Island.

..actually its probably the king of Taupo again making more room for his skydiving outfit..the new waypoints being called PARRA and CHUTE
mattyj is offline   Reply
Old 27th Oct 2008, 06:57   #5 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: west
Posts: 216
Cool nothing like changes but it all looks alright to me.
Green gorilla is offline   Reply
Old 27th Oct 2008, 22:48   #6 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Seat 0A
Posts: 4,070
Quote:
I assume this is in response to the reported delays and airspace issues that we keep hearing about.
Why?
- Because most of industry refuses to embrace ADS-B, making the huge increase in jet traffic in non-radar WA not economically or safely manageable, resulting in too-long periods stuck at lower levels waiting for clearances;

- the refusal of too many captains to use off-track departures OCTA, thereby forcing nose-to-nose conflicts in the climb or descent, which is at best a silly idea. At least we won't have to worry about the Virgin E Jet aces trying to climb through other aircraft's levels with minimal nose-to-nose separation...

It won't help delays at Perth much. There will still be 40 jets trying to land on the one piece of bitumen that can only handle 24 per hour.
Capn Bloggs is offline   Reply
Old 27th Oct 2008, 23:11   #7 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Dubai
Age: 33
Posts: 80
Bloggs,

It might not help with delays (as you so well put it, 40 just doesn't fit into 24!) but it will help us controllers as jets and props will be on different SIDs/STARs so we won't have to push planes around to get everything to work. Provided the weather is nice, it will be a big improvement for us doing the radar enroute around PH - when the weather turns to poo though, it is going to be very ordinary!

On the ADS-B thing, even if every aircraft flying through WA had it, nothing would improve with delays as there is no ADS-B feed into the PH TCU for the flow. All the flow sees are squares (flight plan tracks, ie don't know where they are) or circles (radar tracks). Until they equip PH TCU with the ADS-B feed, there will be no improvement. When will this happen? Got a date yet for hell freezing over?

Also, ADS-B was supposed to have been fully rolled out, completed, operational, yaddah-yaddah-yaddah for 5nm separation by now across the whole continent above F300. Ask any manager in AsA when it will actually get to that point and all you will get is a shrug of the shoulders.

Once ADS-B is all done and the feed is delivered into PH TCU, provided there is decent coverage at turboprop levels out to 250nm+ from PH, there should be a big improvement in the service you receive (won't have to use a procedural standard) and delays will be much better handled as the flow will be able to sequence from an extra 100nm+ out. I wouldn't hold your breath on that happening before 2012 though.....
westausatc is offline   Reply
Old 28th Oct 2008, 00:51   #8 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Jan 1999
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 561
hey Bloggs

No need to display your jealousy about not flying the ejet!
Dehavillanddriver is offline   Reply
Old 28th Oct 2008, 01:05   #9 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Running up that hill
Posts: 209
Its a bit early to tell at the moment but from what I've seen,


Bad
  • no more direct tracking (dct HAIGH R21, dct SPUDO R24 etc) when its quiet
  • more track miles on SID's and STARS's
  • won't be assigned below A100 til inside 36nm
  • a certain PJE drop zone more restricted when PH is on R03/06
  • changes have to align with AIRAC dates – totally new airspace design goes live for the first time on a Thursday morning
Good
  • No 52 DME hight requirement
  • sperate turbo and jet SID/STAR's so much less likely to be taken off SID/STAR or delayed on climb/descent
  • inbound and outbound routes mostly separated, more likely to get unrestricted climb straight to planned level without daft height requirements
  • STARS flow from flight planned route – no more recleared to XXX, YYY transition
  • all holding points published AND on flight planned track
  • many STARS have different tracking for different runways only inside 36nm – RWY changes might actually be safe!
  • racetrack pattern into/out of GEL southbound
  • NRV inside 125.4 FIA, less broadcasts for PH-NRV traffic
  • a certain PJE drop zone less restricted when PH is on R21/24
It would be very interesting to hear what the customers think once its up and running.


NB
Nautilus Blue is offline   Reply
Old 28th Oct 2008, 01:18   #10 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Mostly at Work
Posts: 442
Repeat after me: Airspace does not create delays.

"It's about the Runways (and taxiiways) Stupid"

Always has been, always will be.
direct.no.speed is offline   Reply
Old 28th Oct 2008, 03:09   #11 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Oz
Posts: 24
Technically, airspace (procedures) can and does create delays. If we are talking about 'capacity', then the runways/taxiways are generally the limiting factor.

Happy to be corrected.

Snail
Snail Dave is offline   Reply
Old 28th Oct 2008, 06:31   #12 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Running up that hill
Posts: 209
Quote:
Airspace does not create delays.

"It's about the Runways (and taxiiways) Stupid"
Perth had to go to taxi slot times because TWR could fire aircraft off one RWY fast enough to 'overfil' the airspace. As soon as it calls DEP an aircraft becomes 3nm long and 3nm wide, radar sectors it's 5nm long/5nm wide, in procederual airspace (160nm PH) it's 20nm long and 28nm wide (GPS) or 10 minutres long and 60nm wide. The fact that 90% of PH traffic is in a 135 degree arc doesn't help.

NB
Nautilus Blue is offline   Reply
Old 18th Nov 2008, 00:23   #13 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: lavax
Posts: 131
2 days and counting ...

Jepp's seem to have arrived well on time for this update - much appreciated. Now for that RNAV data base .. fingers crossed otherwise I'm off to the lucky shag.
myshoutcaptain is offline   Reply
Old 18th Nov 2008, 00:36   #14 (permalink)

Bottums Up
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: dunnunda
Age: 55
Posts: 3,039
myshoutcaptain

Have you noticed that the amendment doesn't contain the Flight Planning route requirements?
Capt Claret is offline   Reply
Old 18th Nov 2008, 01:37   #15 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: lavax
Posts: 131
Capt - I haven't no , I am just about to look through .. I did see the route planning as a NOTAM last week however on searching it seems to have gone.

Route data is available from airservices

Scroll down , select , 6 - 6.1 Western Australia

myshoutcaptain is offline   Reply
Old 18th Nov 2008, 03:51   #16 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: godzone
Age: 54
Posts: 35
Flight planning post Nov20

A word of caution - the new route structure and data are firmly established around 'city pairs' planning. Please ensure you pick the right one or flight plan via the correct TMA/ENR gate so that the magic machine will generate your SID correctly.Also - the new routes do not solve the log jam in the TMA. Turbos and jets will join at about 20nm inbound. Be prepared for some serious speed if the winds are strong up top.Runway changes will be a bun fight - expect to hold if you are outside 50nm when we do the change, until the TMA have sorted out those caught inside 30nm. 03 to 21 will be a right royal pain due to the significantally different number of track miles.Above all - please be patient as we are getting used to new conflict points and airspace configurations. We have done 3 simexs covering varying scenarios and are coping with copious amounts of new/altered local instructions, there will be floor walkers in support for the first couple of weeks so we hope that all goes well.
rack 'n stack is offline   Reply
Old 18th Nov 2008, 04:34   #17 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: UAE
Age: 37
Posts: 450
Floor walkers! Where did you get the extra staff?

Best of luck for the transition - hope it goes smoothly for all.

Cheers,

NFR.
No Further Requirements is offline   Reply
Old 18th Nov 2008, 05:17   #18 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Australia
Posts: 185
I hope they got rid of that rediculous waypoint called "ALWYN"
illusion is offline   Reply
Old 18th Nov 2008, 07:54   #19 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Seat 0A
Posts: 4,070
Quote:
I hope they got rid of that rediculous waypoint called "ALWYN"
Perhaps they will when you learn how to spell!

Who is that joker Alwyn anyway? Who's she upset to get her name in lights? Dick Smith?

Last day for head-on pics tomorrow troops - take your cameras and don't forget to smile as I go past!
Capn Bloggs is offline   Reply
Old 18th Nov 2008, 08:38   #20 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Feels like BN CTR
Posts: 82
Best of Luck

Major airspace changes/route structures require an enormous amount of planning, simulation and enthusiasm for change.

Best of luck from BN CTR.....

I know some of my peers in ML CTR especially the BIGHT controllers have a lot of concerns about the changes.

Hope those concerns are wrong??
ER_BN is offline   Reply
 
 
This ad will disappear if you login
Reply
 


Thread Tools


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT. The time now is 17:18.


vBulletin® v3.8.7, Copyright ©2000-2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
SEO by vBSEO 3.6.1
© 1996-2012 The Professional Pilots Rumour Network

As these are anonymous forums the origins of the contributions may be opposite to what may be apparent. In fact the press may use it, or the unscrupulous, or sciolists*, to elicit certain reactions.

*"sciolist"... Noun, archaic. "a person who pretends to be knowledgeable and well informed".