Wikiposts
Search
Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific Airline and RPT Rumours & News in Australia, enZed and the Pacific

Air Niugini News

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 20th Nov 2008, 05:46
  #61 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: Various
Age: 74
Posts: 378
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Lihir Gold.

I believe that Lihir Gold are about to award the LNV-CNS-LNV contract. Me thinks that Air Niugini have got a fair chance of getting this. I have also heard that someone has bidded for the contract using BAE 146's,I figure it would have to be NJS. The idea aircraft for this operation would be a Dash 8 200 with long range tanks,well thats my view !
Waghi Warrior is offline  
Old 20th Nov 2008, 06:34
  #62 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Asia
Posts: 142
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Hi Cocky Jester

I had some dealings with Wasantha and his engineering chap Patrick,

I have to say (as this is an anymous forum) that especially Wasantha you could do a lot worse than this chap. One of the most honest honourable gentleman that I have the pleasure to o business with. It was a little disappointing about the outcome on the 767 purchase from RBA, but that wasnt PX's fault really they were just looking for the best deal for the Airline and I think that this is most important point!

Remember I coming from an objective view here, I can only give great reviews about this chap as he is not interested in putting his snout in the trough. He is interested in the good of the Airline, I can honestly say that this is my view, he is a good guy!

I think that Wasantha and Patrick know who I am as I am based in Singapore.

BRGDS
Orangputi is offline  
Old 20th Nov 2008, 09:12
  #63 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: In the ether
Posts: 99
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Orangputi, there are those that do not agree with your observations based on closer involvement.
7mile is offline  
Old 20th Nov 2008, 13:26
  #64 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: darwin australia
Posts: 110
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
146 To Lnv?

146 to Lihir!! From memory,1200m gravel (coral) 1 point something slope & "very damp" most of the time.Unless they plan to lengthen & seal it,"Tell him he's dreamin' son.
mauswara is offline  
Old 20th Nov 2008, 19:50
  #65 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: 12 North
Age: 64
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Ok, so if PX is using the B757, -FII on the POM-KL route, two questions;
1. Is this plane ETOPS approved by PNG DCA since it has not been operated by PX for 12 months as required by the regs.
2. B757-200s will not have the fuel endurance to do direct route anyway, so how are they doing this legally... ?
MACH.85 is offline  
Old 20th Nov 2008, 19:57
  #66 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 144
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Mach.85

B757-200 range is 3900NM, POM-KUL is approx 2900NM...Am i missing something??


NZ2.
NewZealand2 is offline  
Old 21st Nov 2008, 00:08
  #67 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: QLD
Posts: 587
Received 14 Likes on 6 Posts
LGL has plans to expend Lihir by 200m to 1400m to fit NJS 146 next year.
Then APNG to run a Dash 8 around the rest of the runs.
Work has not yet started.
geeup is offline  
Old 21st Nov 2008, 03:44
  #68 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Port Moresby
Age: 51
Posts: 28
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Lihir 146

I like the 146 aircraft but I wonder about the economics of the sector into Lihir from Cairns with how many passengers? It certainly will be tight getting in and out.

PX have a DHC-8-315 with long range tanks than seems a little too much lift for the run, but at least 1200 meters is comfortable for this aircraft.
LVDT is offline  
Old 21st Nov 2008, 04:55
  #69 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Oz
Posts: 469
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
My memory is not that clear, but is Lihir an (ICAO standard) designated international airport.

I do not mean like the PNG Government think (claim) Tokua or Momote are international standard. Lets not mention Jacksons either.

tipsy
tipsy2 is offline  
Old 21st Nov 2008, 09:33
  #70 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Deep South
Posts: 116
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Speaking of ICAO standards, what happened to the audit of PNG?
Ricky Bobby is offline  
Old 22nd Nov 2008, 03:54
  #71 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Australia at the moment
Posts: 177
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Tipsy2 A/PNG have been flying to Lihir direct from Cairns for a year now. Lihir has customs and quarantine paid for by the mine. ICAO approval or not has nothing to do with whether a company can fly to a place internationally, the regulatory authorities in PNG decide what are designated International ports.
Runway extension will not be done for ages land owners and compensation will hold it up.
Contract encompasses CS-LHR-CS operation, PY-LHR-PYand the big one LHR to all ports that the mine decides are neccessay, for it's FIFO operation.
It's a biggy. 3 Dash 8's. 146 maybe one day? The mine has big plans for expansion, it will need the 146 then.
The current A/PNG Dash (CS-LHR-CS) operates in 12 seat executive config, so money is not a problem. After all it"s a GOLD mine you know.
The decision date for the preferred operator is December.
Thems the facts jack
Cravenmorehead is offline  
Old 22nd Nov 2008, 04:40
  #72 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Oz
Posts: 469
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Silly me, I always understood PNG international designated airports were declared on the whim of the minister at some press conference on EMTV or other.

If the following quote is infact correct then I submit that the PNG authorities have been operating contrary to international law and convention. I'm sure that would come as no surprise to many of us.

ICAO approval or not has nothing to do with whether a company can fly to a place internationally, the regulatory authorities in PNG decide what are designated International ports.
tipsy
tipsy2 is offline  
Old 24th Nov 2008, 07:09
  #73 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: All at sea
Posts: 2,194
Received 155 Likes on 103 Posts
The Bae 146 never did get properly approved in gravel kitted form. To my knowledge, only one ever operated on gravel - in private category for a Saudi Prince. Where anything goes. There was a gravel kit for the B732, but with 1200 m that aeroplane can't go near LNV either. So, unless they seal the runway, and do a lot of work to widen the side strip areas, it's a Dash 8 or similar for the foreseeable future.
Mach E Avelli is offline  
Old 24th Nov 2008, 11:52
  #74 (permalink)  

Retired Tiger pilot
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Club Morocco. Subic Bay. Philippines
Posts: 460
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
NZ 2.

757 - 767.

Why cross train when I understood that both aircraft are on the same pilot's type-rating!
Sharpie is offline  
Old 24th Nov 2008, 21:36
  #75 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: PPrune nominee 2011!
Posts: 1,561
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Better still why dont they have two 767's instead of 757 & a 767?
Skystar320 is offline  
Old 24th Nov 2008, 23:21
  #76 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 144
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Hmm, didn't know that sharpie - interesting.

Well why NOT have a 757 and a 767 Skystar?


NZ2.
NewZealand2 is offline  
Old 24th Nov 2008, 23:41
  #77 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: PPrune nominee 2011!
Posts: 1,561
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Well having one of each would certainly increasing operating costs, by having too of the same type means decreased costs
Skystar320 is offline  
Old 25th Nov 2008, 01:50
  #78 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Port Moresby
Age: 51
Posts: 28
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
757-767

Actually the operating costs are fixed since they are damp leased and engines, block checks etc are all accounted for in the lease rate.
Fuel flow is an issue and the 757 is a good aircraft to substitute on lighter runs which would be not so economical with a 767.

Therefore the 757 and 767 combination is less expensive than a pair of 767, and have more lift than a pair of 757.

The common type rating is helpful but only for pilots and not engineers.
LVDT is offline  
Old 25th Nov 2008, 06:48
  #79 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Australia at the moment
Posts: 177
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Mach E Avelli
I think 146-100's can operate into gravel runways with high floation gear.
Not totally sure though.
Cravenmorehead is offline  
Old 25th Nov 2008, 22:30
  #80 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: All at sea
Posts: 2,194
Received 155 Likes on 103 Posts
There's more to the gravel kit than just the high float gear. The belly must have a fibreglass protection strip and I am not sure whether the nose gear must have a deflector or special chined tyres to stop debris going up into the engines. In any case, although much of the development work was done when the Poms were trying to drum up interest for the aircraft in developing areas, it never got certified as far as I am aware. Probably because they needed a minimum order of 10 to pay for the approvals and most countries in the market for such a beast could only afford to buy one or two at the most.
Not to say someone couldn't pick it up and run with it, as all the design work and initial performance data has to be out there somewhere. But dealing with the PNG CAA or CASA to get it approved for commercial operations? Good luck!
Pity, because the Avro RJ would make a great semi-STOL dirt runway jet in a specialised application. But, expensive to operate, so it would take a Lihir Gold to afford it.
Mach E Avelli is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.