PPRuNe Forums

PPRuNe Forums (https://www.pprune.org/)
-   ATC Issues (https://www.pprune.org/atc-issues-18/)
-   -   Minimum Radar Separation Question (https://www.pprune.org/atc-issues/364418-minimum-radar-separation-question.html)

Office Pest 2nd Mar 2009 16:19

Minimum Radar Separation Question
 
I have a quick question which I hope some kind soul can help me with. What is the minimum radar separation between aircraft in the airways and in the TMA in the UK please? I am sure there are many stipulations about this but a rough idea would be greatly appreciated. I tried to look it up whilst in the cruise today but quickly lost the will to live.

Best Regards,
Office Pest.

Spitoon 2nd Mar 2009 16:28

5 nautical miles

Over+Out 2nd Mar 2009 16:38

3 nm in the LTMA, for aircraft working TC sectors

Roffa 2nd Mar 2009 17:42

And just to muddy the waters further, LHR approach can use 2.5nm, 2nm and also less than 2nm under varying criteria.

Spitoon 2nd Mar 2009 17:48

I was trying to do the 'rough idea'.

But now, for my edification, do we still use 8NM or 10NM anywhere in the en-route environment in the UK?

NorthSouth 2nd Mar 2009 17:55

10nm still used in SW Approaches and off Hebrides where service is SSR only
NS

Office Pest 2nd Mar 2009 18:03

Many thanks for all your replies. Yes I thought it was roughly 5nm en-route and 3nm in the terminal area. I fully appreciate it wholly depends on where you are etc....

Best Regards,
O.P.

ron83 2nd Mar 2009 18:05


And just to muddy the waters further, LHR approach can use 2.5nm, 2nm and also less than 2nm under varying criteria.
never heard of 2 and less nm separation,what are criterion for those?:rolleyes:

Roffa 2nd Mar 2009 18:23


never heard of 2 and less nm separation,what are criterion for those?
I'm not going into the criteria because they're in the TC MATS Pt 2 and it's not my place to publish stuff from that here, but suffice to say it involves final approach and parallel runways.

:rolleyes: if you want but the procedures are there in black and white and used as well.

Avman 2nd Mar 2009 18:49

And a SATCO to boot :oh::hmm: :E

octavian 2nd Mar 2009 19:52

Aim for 10, get 2, call it 5. Oh blast, forgot about the SMF.

divingduck 2nd Mar 2009 20:13

min sep
 
1/6 of a mile...otherwise known as 1000 feet:E

HEATHROW DIRECTOR 3rd Mar 2009 07:05

<<I'm not going into the criteria because they're in the TC MATS Pt 2 and it's not my place to publish stuff from that here, but suffice to say it involves final approach and parallel runways.>>

Roffa.... Yes, but 2nm is not a radar separation surely? Are you talking about visual separation between aircraft on parallel runways? In which case there is no defined separation.

I shall be seeing one of the Heathrow Directors this morning and will be finding out more!! 2.5nm separation on final approach was the minimum when I was there, but that's long ago!

FantomZorbin 3rd Mar 2009 07:24

"1/2 a mile behind is better than 3 in front" ... heard from a very old and bold ATCO!

Roffa 3rd Mar 2009 08:46


Roffa.... Yes, but 2nm is not a radar separation surely? Are you talking about visual separation between aircraft on parallel runways? In which case there is no defined separation.
No, I am talking about radar separation HD. It's a procedure that was brought in some time after you left. I can use 2nm separation in IMC conditions under certain specific criteria.

Times they are a-changin'...

HEATHROW DIRECTOR 3rd Mar 2009 11:19

Roffa.. Yep, fully understood now. Had it explained to me this morning in words of one syllable!! Just means I take my hat off more often in admiration for what you people do nowadays. I'd never have validated under current conditions.

Del Prado 3rd Mar 2009 11:43


I'd never have validated under current conditions.

Bollox.:ok:

Stenner153 3rd Mar 2009 17:04

Seperation
 
3 miles within 40 miles of the radar head, and dependant on the controllers experience.

HEATHROW DIRECTOR 3rd Mar 2009 18:11

Stenner.. Presumably military? I know of no civil procedures in which separation is based on controller experience.

People... please forgive an ancient controller for joining in but I'm still fascinated by ATC and learn a great deal from these forums. Might come in useful when I'm re-incarnated!!

anotherthing 3rd Mar 2009 18:54

HD

Stenners comment is certainly not derived from UK Military, don't know where he/she is getting it from.

Nothing in the military rules about 'controller experience'. IIRC it states 'where approved, within 40 miles of the radar overhead at or below FL245 between participating aircraft'


All times are GMT. The time now is 14:28.


Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.