Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Ground & Other Ops Forums > ATC Issues
Reload this Page >

Wake Turbulence Separation - Reciprocal Runways

Wikiposts
Search
ATC Issues A place where pilots may enter the 'lions den' that is Air Traffic Control in complete safety and find out the answers to all those obscure topics which you always wanted to know the answer to but were afraid to ask.

Wake Turbulence Separation - Reciprocal Runways

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 5th Apr 2017, 12:41
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: South Africa
Age: 38
Posts: 50
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Wake Turbulence Separation - Reciprocal Runways

Good day,

Imagine a situation where an MD-11 takes off from RWY36 and next in line is a B737 taking off from RWY18. Is there a requirement for wake turbulence separation in this case?

The only requirement I can find in Doc 4444 is for an aircraft making a low fly-by or go-around from RWY36 in this example, before the B737 takes off from RWY18.

Also, I have heard some controllers mention that there is no wake turbulence separation requirement when the x-wind component exceeds a certain value. Again I have been unable to find any reference. Can anyone confirm if this is the case?

Many thanks,

PJ
Prop Job is offline  
Old 5th Apr 2017, 15:28
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: LHR/EGLL
Age: 45
Posts: 4,392
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
In the U.K. wake separation applies if the airborne tracks will cross, so I would suggest that it would depend on the rotation point of the MD11.

I'm not aware of any current method of reducing wake separation due to crosswind that's in operation.
Gonzo is offline  
Old 5th Apr 2017, 16:01
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: GA, USA
Posts: 3,206
Likes: 0
Received 23 Likes on 10 Posts
Technically wake doesn't start till the rotation point.
So for the sake of the discussion we have a 10,000' runway.
MD-11 takes off 18 and rotates at the 6000' marker.
The 737 would have to rotate and be airborne well before the 4000' marker in order to cross paths.
Assuming a no wind condition.
Now the MD11 taking off with a max legal tailwind changes the dynamics but it also changes the rotation point.
The 737 taking off into the headwind would still not encounter the wake.
Try drawing it if that makes any sense.
If we're talking about a 14,000'+ runway and light take off weights you might be able to make it work.
Now a light GA airplane is a completely different story.
And the ATC controller still doesn't make your decisions for you.
If you don't like it you don't go.
B2N2 is offline  
Old 8th Apr 2017, 08:38
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: under a single european sky
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
UK Cap 493
9G. Departures – Opposite Direction
9G.1 A380-800. A wake turbulence separation minimum of 3 minutes shall be applied between a Light, Small or Medium (Upper and Lower) aircraft and an A380-800 aircraft when the A380-800 aircraft is making a low or missed approach and the Light, Small or Medium aircraft is:
(1) utilising an opposite-direction runway for take-off; or
(2) landing on the same runway in the opposite direction, or on a parallel opposite- direction runway separated by less than 760 m.
9G.2 Other aircraft categories. A wake turbulence separation of 2 minutes shall be applied between a Medium (Upper and Lower), Small or Light aircraft and a Heavy aircraft, and between a Medium (Upper and Lower) or Small aircraft and a Light aircraft whenever the heavier aircraft is making a low or missed approach and the lighter aircraft is:
(1) utilising an opposite-direction runway for take-off; or
(2) landing on the same runway in the opposite direction; or on a parallel opposite direction runway separated by less than 760 m.
Romeo_Fox is offline  
Old 8th Apr 2017, 18:36
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: LHR/EGLL
Age: 45
Posts: 4,392
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Romeo Fox, the OP was after departure following departure from opposite ends, not departure following landing/missed approach.
Gonzo is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.