Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Ground & Other Ops Forums > ATC Issues
Reload this Page >

EBOT tolerances question

Wikiposts
Search
ATC Issues A place where pilots may enter the 'lions den' that is Air Traffic Control in complete safety and find out the answers to all those obscure topics which you always wanted to know the answer to but were afraid to ask.

EBOT tolerances question

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11th Dec 2015, 12:08
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: England
Posts: 741
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 1 Post
EBOT tolerances question

Guys,

I heard it mentioned in conversation that some of the major UK airports now do not allow pilots the +/-15 mins on their FPL departure time, but expect aircraft to taxy exactly on the time. I can not find any reference to this in any documents or procedures. I would be grateful if one of you good guys could direct me to where this may be written.

Also I used to have a doc which listed the CFMU taxy times at major airports for the respective runways but can not find this information any more. Again I would be grateful if one of you could direct me to the reference.

Thank you for your help,

MM
Miles Magister is offline  
Old 11th Dec 2015, 15:45
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: LHR/EGLL
Age: 45
Posts: 4,392
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Airport CDM has muddied the waters somewhat.

Airports with CDM running will provide individual taxi times from individual stand to individual runway, varying by aircraft type, aircraft operator, season and other factors.

So a taxi time from LHR stand 511 to 27R in Summer for a BA 320 may be 14.79 minutes, but in winter might be 13.96 minutes, and for a BA 320 on stand 512 it might be 14.93 mins in Summer and 14.21 mins in Winter.

CDM also uses TOBT - target off blocks time. Airports differ in the tolerance on this time, some insist that you call ready at this time exactly to get push back approval, others have a 3 or 5 minute tolerance.

This should all be detailed in the airport's AIP entry.
Gonzo is online now  
Old 11th Dec 2015, 17:21
  #3 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: England
Posts: 741
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 1 Post
Thank you. I did search the AIP but was unable to find the information you posted.
Miles Magister is offline  
Old 11th Dec 2015, 17:38
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: The Winchester
Posts: 6,553
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Won't do a cut and paste but for example at LHR our documentation, which is derived from the AIP, says something like..


Airport Collaborative Decision Making (CDM)

CDM concept in use at this airport. See GenPart ADR Chapter 6 and in addition:

- Be ready TOBT and inform DLV (time window ±5min)

- Expect information from ATC if delay more than 5min.

- REQ start-up at TOBT +5min, otherwise sequence PSN is lost.

- REQ push-back latest 5min after transferred from DLV.

Hope that's of some help.

Last edited by wiggy; 11th Dec 2015 at 17:52.
wiggy is offline  
Old 11th Dec 2015, 19:13
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Reading, UK
Posts: 15,818
Received 201 Likes on 93 Posts
Here's what the AIP says:

Airport - Collaborative Decision Making (A-CDM)

(1) TOBT/TSAT

+ (aa) Pilots should take note of the TSAT which they receive from their AO/GH or ATC and comply with it;

+ (bb) If TOBT or TSAT can no longer be met, at any time, then TOBT must be updated by AO/GH;

+ (cc) Pilot should ensure that the flight is ready to depart at TOBT (window of -5 to +5 minutes).

(2) Start Request - Heathrow Delivery

+ (aa) Pilot should report ready to Heathrow Delivery at TOBT (window of -5 to +5 minutes);

+ (bb) ATC will then approve start or in the case of a delay will advise the TSAT;

++ (i) Pilots to monitor the frequency from this point, as TSAT can improve up to TOBT;

++ (ii) Start approval will be issued, based on TSAT and the prevailing traffic situation;

++ (iii) Pilots will be informed of an ATC delay to TSAT in excess of 5 minutes.

+ (cc) If at TOBT + 5 minutes ATC have not received a start up request the aircraft may lose its position in the sequence.

++ (i) ATC will advise the pilot that a new TOBT is required;

++ (ii) Once the new TOBT is entered the flight will be re-sequenced according to a new TOBT, with a subsequent delay;

++ (iii) The aircraft will not be allowed to depart until a valid TOBT is entered and revised TSAT given and complied with.

(3) Pushback Request - Heathrow Ground

+ (aa) Pushback/Start clearance must be requested from Ground no later than 5 minutes after being transferred from Delivery;

+ (bb) If unable to meet this constraint, the aircraft will not be allowed to pushback. A valid TOBT must then be issued by the AO/GH and ATC will then issue a revised TSAT.

(4) Remote Holding Request

+ (aa) If an eligible AO is aware of a CTOT and wishes to take the delay on a taxiway rather than on the stand, then they should contact the Tower Supervisor by telephone to arrange it;

+ (bb) In this instance, the TSAT will be adjusted to allow the aircraft to be transferred to GMC earlier for the remote hold.
DaveReidUK is offline  
Old 11th Dec 2015, 20:18
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: ireland
Posts: 221
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
the +/-15 mins on their FPL departure time,
This was intended to facilitate ATC.
Problems arise when some operators that its theirs.

Operators should always aim to be at the departure point at their expected take off time.
confused atco is offline  
Old 11th Dec 2015, 20:20
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Rapunzel's tower
Posts: 441
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Although at the UK's most punctual airport they still apply +/- 15mins on EOBT (Providing flight is not regulated by CTOT)
good egg is offline  
Old 12th Dec 2015, 21:07
  #8 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: England
Posts: 741
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 1 Post
Thank you guys
Miles Magister is offline  
Old 19th Jan 2016, 17:31
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: UK
Posts: 50
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
CDM got nothing to do with it - we are talking EOBT here - look in the UK AIP Enroute section which clearly states the requirements, and points out nothing to do with ATC unless ATC are the cause of delay.

It's been regulation for probably 10 years plus that it's the aircraft operator/airline/handling agent (delete depending on your operation structure) to ensure that you EOBT is updated - the issue comes that airlines know they will never make the EOBT(plane not even arrived yet) but don't update it - the crew then call ATC when ready for push and rightfully so nowadays ATC tell them to get their operations(who you paying money to) to update it, issue is for years ATC used to fix it for you - but that can cause all sorts of issues - plus we often now employing someone to do that for you.

Form a network point of view and sector management and production of slots it's the EOBT that generating these restrictions - so in pre planning if from EOBT 10 aircraft are planned to depart and be in a sector at the same time this could result in some form of flow, when in reality 5 of those aircraft won't be departing then they just haven't updated their EOBT - so other aircraft are getting slots based on false data - so airlines that only update their EOBT at last minute generally buggering the system up for everyone else!
3miles is offline  
Old 20th Jan 2016, 05:39
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: LHR/EGLL
Age: 45
Posts: 4,392
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
3miles,

You might be talking EOBT here, but it seemed to me that the OP was hearing conversations that were muddling EOBT with CDM-related matters.
Gonzo is online now  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.