Right-of-Way for traffic being overtaken
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Somewhere
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Right-of-Way for traffic being overtaken
Hi, recently one of pilots reported my collegue stating that his FL was changed in spite of the fact that he was the one being overtaken by the succeeding traffic and according to Annex 2 to he has the right-of-way and he must keep his flight level. I checked Annex 2 but under the related section it is stated that the aircraft that has the right-of-way shall maintain its speed and heading. There is no mention of FL. In this respect I am a bit confused. Also in todays traffic flow it is not easy and logical for a controller not to play with the level of preceeding everytime traffic cause there are numerous variants like the settled spacing mimina with the downstream unit by the LoA. In our case the preceeding traffic was an A320 and behind that aircraft at same level there were two A38O's whose performances were much higher than him and going to enter another FIR through the same exit point with an agreed spacing minima of 20 NMs.
Does the right of way cover maintaining of FL and is it mandatory to apply it in any case even if it would be cumbersome and increase the worklod to apply it? Can anyone enlighten me on this issue?
Does the right of way cover maintaining of FL and is it mandatory to apply it in any case even if it would be cumbersome and increase the worklod to apply it? Can anyone enlighten me on this issue?
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Way north
Age: 47
Posts: 497
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
When it comes to flightlevels, the first one "shall normally have priority", as stated in DOC 4444.
But look at DOC 4444 5.3.3.6 and 5.3.3.7.
But there are a lot of factors, and every situation is different. So the word here is "normally", it's still at the controllers discretion.
There are a lot of reasons why one would change the flight level of a preeceding, but it usually comes down to, what's easiest.
But look at DOC 4444 5.3.3.6 and 5.3.3.7.
But there are a lot of factors, and every situation is different. So the word here is "normally", it's still at the controllers discretion.
There are a lot of reasons why one would change the flight level of a preeceding, but it usually comes down to, what's easiest.
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Adrift upon the tides of fate
Posts: 1,840
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Does the right of way cover maintaining of FL and is it mandatory to apply it in any case
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Adrift upon the tides of fate
Posts: 1,840
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
They are contained in unit instructions, which go by different names (such as LATSI- local air traffic services instructions, MATS- manual of air traffic services etc.), and are unfortunately not available online, to my knowledge. The 'head of power' for such a rule is ICAO DOC 4444 10.2.1 "Air traffic control units shall issue such air traffic control clearances as are necessary to meet the objectives of collision prevention and the expedition and maintenance of an
orderly flow of air traffic."
orderly flow of air traffic."
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Alaska, PNG, etc.
Age: 60
Posts: 1,550
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Hi, recently one of pilots reported my collegue stating that his FL was changed in spite of the fact that he was the one being overtaken by the succeeding traffic and according to Annex 2 to he has the right-of-way and he must keep his flight level. I checked Annex 2 but under the related section it is stated that the aircraft that has the right-of-way shall maintain its speed and heading. There is no mention of FL. In this respect I am a bit confused.
Right of way rules , like in Annex 2, are intended to guide *pilots* as to who has the responsibility to alter course when there is a conflict in the absence of ATC. (presumably, if ATC were present, there would be no conflict) They are not intended as instructions or procedures for Air Traffic Control on how to manage traffic.
As an analogy, think of road traffic right of way rules. In the US, at least, a driver is required to yield to another who is to the right of them in the absence of other traffic control devices That's the key. If there is a stop sign, the driver wit the stop sign yields to the one without, even though he may be to the other's right.
The right of way rules are intended to guide you when there here there is no other information on who has the right of way. They are not intended as rules for programing traffic signals or for traffic cops to direct traffic at an intersection. In fact, as a busy intersection if you had a traffic light that always allowed the driver on the right to proceed, you'd have complete failure, everybody has someone else to their right.
Likewise the Right of way rules for aviation are to keep pilots from running into each other when they have no other guidance, they are not intended as rules for Air Traffic Controllers. There can be many situations where the simplest, most efficient way for ATC to keep traffic moving may be at odds with the right of way rules which would be in effect if there were no ATC present.