Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Ground & Other Ops Forums > ATC Issues
Reload this Page >

Problems with ATC Accusation

Wikiposts
Search
ATC Issues A place where pilots may enter the 'lions den' that is Air Traffic Control in complete safety and find out the answers to all those obscure topics which you always wanted to know the answer to but were afraid to ask.

Problems with ATC Accusation

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 28th Aug 2014, 15:52
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Uruguay
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Problems with ATC Accusation

Hi, WE been accused from decent a minimum altitude in BEEF ISLAND Airport in our final approach.
We follow the instruction by the san juan control and the ATC from beef and after we land ATC make us call to san juan control, the guy said that we are under investigation under the statement that we decent below route minimums but we follow their instructions.
We decent a maintain 3300ft after that ATC Told Us to decent and maintain 3000ft regard the sector altitude is 3300ft.
So we don't understand the accusation.
Can someone tell me what are the troubles if we are wrong (fines or something like that).
We try to send our statement but we are waiting someone to call us.
RodrigoGomez is offline  
Old 29th Aug 2014, 01:00
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: glendale
Posts: 819
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Was your plane in RADAR contact? An altitude given by a radar controller is usually quite safe and legal (they do make mistakes )

Sector altitudes are really sort of emergency only altitude and are not the min enroute or similar altitudes.

Were you established on a feeder route or other published part of the approach?
glendalegoon is offline  
Old 29th Aug 2014, 02:49
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Where the Quaboag River flows, USA
Age: 71
Posts: 3,413
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Without details on what approach was being flown, the clearance given, etc hard to give firm answer. But, if SJC ATC files the report with the FAA, the FAA Legal office (Enforcement Branch is its title) will forward the report to the ICAO in Montreal to be forwarded to your Civil Aviation regulator fir action, if they find it warranted. Assuming you are operating under the Uruguay DGCA, you might make some quiet inquiries or just remain quiet and wait. It'll be them that takes any action.

GF
galaxy flyer is offline  
Old 30th Aug 2014, 18:33
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: in a TCU
Posts: 558
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Air safety reports, at least in the country I live in, are impersonal, using the provided form you just report that in such place at such moment something occurred and the office in charge need to investigate if those operations were following or not the given standard, point, ATC units are not supposed to explicitally blame someone or give the personal judge, everything should be done under the just culture policy, if you were wrong you will learn something from it.
blissbak is offline  
Old 1st Sep 2014, 01:35
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Way north
Age: 47
Posts: 497
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Like said in a previous post by glendalegoon, the magic phrase is "RADAR contact", once you've been identified descend is on me/the controller, and I'll add for wind and temperature as well.

Where I work, the MSA is 5300ft, but once you're on radar, we can take you down as low as 3100ft in certain areas. But when the radar is out for maintenance, or power cuts (happens, rarely but it happens). Then it's the 5300ft and then YOU, being the pilot, have to add for temperature and wind aloft, we help a bit by stating when giving the MSA that it's not temperature corrected.

We have a few that adds for temperature and wind, even when under radar control, fair enough, it's always better to be safe than sorry. We just notify it's already been done and everything is smooth again.

But be carefull, there has been accidents through the years where aircrafts has crashed due to the pilots not understanding that they themselves were responsible for terrainclearance.
jmmoric is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.